 5.8 The answer is greedy for recognition and fame
to the organizers of "model representations for ..."
"When heroes leave,
there are clowns on the arena "
Heine
Dear Vladislav Borisovich !!!
Please explain about the "heritage." I agree that there are ideas that common sense sidestep. I have this kind of "science" is not interesting and cause a yawn. We are talking about physics, as I understand it, for conferences where you meet Klyushina and Smirnov discussed everything in a row in order to discuss everything, I guess. Klyushin We talked about it, and he thinks that this Congress has let some - this is, but if you do something in addition to it, it is necessary to include some kind of filter (pretty hard, of course).
NPA is a springboard for discussion of physical ideas of all kinds (relativistic, non-relativistic, quantum, non-quantum, and so on). Some goals of a revolution in science or something else they do not have global. Have on hand the last two collections of their conferences, well, so everything is what I saw - physicist (given the status of "seriousness" will not, because I did not look carefully).
Explain what you mean by "like-minded". It is in scientific terms, or in terms of goals. In scientific terms, everything is so variegated that gather a group of people supporting one theory - the problem is very difficult (I would say that in more or less serious scale - impossible). But is the purpose of all one - recognition (although the physics of her dream more than others). Naturally I want to once we have all received one theory, which will be the closest thing to something that will call "objective", but it is unclear when, and now think are important twofold: to separate the rational from the irrational theories and exit the level of which is now occupied by "adopted" paradigm, so that everything discussed on an equal footing, without any pseudo-scientific motivated. The order can be changed objectives, and current paradigms well have been forgotten as a nightmare.
Best Regards, Igor Vasilyevich Pesterev.
..............................................................................................
Dear Egor Vasilievich!
I will try to answer your questions. It is well known that the theory of knowledge of the world around us there are only two directions: dialectical materialism and idealism - are in an antagonistic confrontation.
Dialectical materialism - is a generalized, experimentally confirmed by the experience of scientific activities of many generations of outstanding scientists, based on common sense.
Idealism - it is just "the idea that common sense sidestep."
In the present study these topics and lit enough to understand. Of course, a complete proof of the validity of these statements are presented in the works of the classics of dialectical materialism and science.
In addition to the above, the accompanying discussion with the Academy of Natural Sciences Yuri Ivanov.
Propaganda crazy pseudo-religious ideas and dope the powers necessary to dupe the public consciousness, a distraction from the struggle for social justice and the enslavement of the masses.
When the "new Russian" robbing the Soviet Union, the vast majority of the population was diverted "loading of the cans" in front of TV screens, by Chumak, and sermons Kashpirovsky.
So why should we discuss ideas that "are not interesting and cause a yawn" and repel from us the true scientists?
Are twenty years of experience organizing conferences, so never learned anything? Instead of three hundred scientists from around the world at the conference comes barely two - three dozen members of the ignorant, "pursuing only one goal - the recognition." These inventors' model representations of events ... "and pose a serious threat to science, which Engels wrote:" sublime nonsense in poetry, in philosophy, in political economy, history, sublime nonsense from the pulpit and platform, sublime nonsense everywhere, sublime nonsense with a claim to superiority and depth of thought ...
We can no longer take up almost a theoretical book on natural science without getting the her the impression that natural scientists themselves feel how much they are dominated by this incoherence and confusion, and that now current, so to speak, philosophy does not give absolutely no way out. And there really is no other choice, no other option but to return to some form of metaphysical thinking to dialectical. "
Instead of having to leave their mark in science because they dirtied her as heritage, to understand this, sometimes, can not afford, and a hundred wise men. I hope now it is clear that such "legacy"?
Our supporters - a classic dialectical materialism and all of the outstanding scientists of all time, who have left their mark on the development of science, as well as all modern scientists who defend the position of dialectical materialism.
Supporters Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov, Russian Academy of Sciences Osipov President and Vice President of Russian Academy of Sciences Fortova, Professor A.P. Smirnov and others like them - pseudoscientific swindlers: Einstein, Academician Joffe and others, who, being unable to deny the natural sciences conquest of dialectical materialism, scientific methods, have to resort to outright lies, falsifications and prohibitions - have sunk to the idealist position "for other ways. . there was no "- the recognition of the former President of the USSR S. Vavilov. Their pseudo theory is "the height of absurdity and an affront to common sense", according to the apt definition of the Nobel Prize Alfven, have nothing to do with objective reality and experimental evidence.
You write: "Naturally, I want to once we have all received one theory, which will be the closest thing to something that will call" objective ", but it is not clear when."
In this you are mistaken. This theory, accepted by all scientists, for a long time there and it is called - dialectical materialism. However, with the filing of pseudoscientific fraud, today it has become fashionable to ignore. And to invent "new" physical "model representations of events ... ', under the approving applause obscurantist, it was a special trendy" squeak ".
Only these successes Piskun, clowns and "pompous windbag" do not want to have to.
Yours faithfully, Vladislav Cherepennikov
Discussion with the Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
Vladislav Borisovich.
I do not understand why to fight and with what? What is the meaning, for what purpose? To rule the roast in science? To pass for a fool among fools (or a fool among fools)? But even among the opponents of relativism there is no unity. None of Newton's admirers did not respond clearly and specifically on the issues that Newton himself wanted to answer. What is offered in exchange? And how you can offer, when prompted, one hears only himself. For this reason, I do not participate in such events and does not endorse them.
There is no self-confidence. To know how the world really is. So I'm leaving discussion of tangible or intangible of the universe, but instead offers an approach to all scientific theories as to the model representations. And then: "the model representation of the phenomena of Newton," "model representation of phenomena according to Einstein," "model representation of the phenomena of Smirnov, Sidorov, Petrov ..." etc. Or this approach is bad ???
With regard to the obscurantism, the unknowing less obscurantist than who know exactly how everything is arranged and expelling dissenters. If you want to know my opinion about pseudoscience, then take a look here: http://www.mirit.ru/video/008.htm in "Science and Pseudoscience."
Sincerely, Director
Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
................................................................................................ ..
To director of Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
Dear Yuri Nikolaevich!
"When leaving the heroes,
on the arena there are clowns "
Heine
I took advantage of your advice, and watched movies. As for the criticism of "the agony of dying" scientific "paradigm" of quantum-relativistic subconscious questions asked.
Next, you write: "I wish I knew how the world really is. So I'm leaving discussion of tangible or intangible of the universe, but instead offers an approach to all scientific theories as to the model representations. And then: "the model representation of the phenomena of Newton," "model representation of phenomena according to Einstein," "model representation of the phenomena of Smirnov, Sidorov, Petrov ..." etc. Or this approach is bad ??? ".
On this question you already answered many times classics of natural science, that this approach is really bad, as leads to positivism and subjective idealism, from which you have just tried to disown.
The same opinion is shared by the V.A. Atsyukovsky that meets you there under Nature Ivanov and Smirnova, Einstein ... that nature exists by itself and independently of us. Science as a learning process, is committed to identify basic concepts, patterns and relationships that exist in nature. And this knowledge make scientific paradigm. Truth "how the world works" there. And the best minds of mankind as a result of a centuries-old activity brings us closer to that "to know ...."
You rightly rejecting the paradigm of quantum-relativistic subconscious, as contrary to the laws of nature and experience, at the same time splashes and the paradigm of dialectical materialism, upon which all our knowledge, and that not only are its repeated confirmation in nature, but they are theoretical tool in practice activity. Indeed, to answer all the questions we can not ever. But this is the process of learning. "Taking the path of Marxist theory we shall approach the objective truth more and more (without ever exhausting it), but by following any other path we can not come to anything but confusion and lies." This VI Lenin warned of you from reactionary encroachments. But, unfortunately, you are these "freaks" - the classics of dialectical materialism - do not read, do not respect and reject.
Rejecting the accumulated knowledge "Giants", by definition, of Newton, "Heroes", by definition, Heine, what do you offer in return? And, in fact, nothing - clowning, confusion and lies. You learned that natural processes occur largely cyclical and erect this dogma, like Einstein, who declared that everything is relative in the world. But with this, no one argues. The trouble is that the more of these unsubstantiated allegations have nothing. What is gravity, you ask? It rhythmodynamics answer you. Why do microbes move backwards - forward? It rhythmodynamics answer you. And so on.
So what is the essence of the processes and phenomena? Classical science gives satisfactory qualitative and quantitative answers to these questions. You also only "qualitative explanations", as claimed by you. You see that there is something jumping and swaying, and that's the whole story - rhythmodynamics word.
Give me billions of dollars, you say, and we all do not levitate in a dream, but reality. And you are referring to "reliable sources", allegedly, already flying monks. There was, however, a poor nun who tried to resist, but she was forced to fly evil spirits. And this nonsense you call science? And demand that you took away billions of budgetary funds for the development of delirium. So what is the worst explanation: "everything from God, and who does not agree that in the fire?"
Then you have suffered and about his grandmother, who was visiting her granddaughter after death and about a woman whose inner voice told: "Hold stronger engagement ring or they will ". Gives you a miracle "horse Wolf blown sail," supposedly having no scientific explanation. In aviation, this phenomenon is widely used and is called the thrust reversers and is calculated with a high degree of accuracy based on the theory that you are trying to reject. Ask the V.A. Atsukovsky, you will interpret it.
All your "science" is well described by Engels in his article "Natural perfume in the world." But you, of course, these "freaks" do not read, do not respect and deny, so to challenge you useless for warning A. Pushkin.
But you, Yuri, is not so simple and naive as you would like to appear. Before Newton level, Faraday, Maxwell, Engels, Lenin, etc. You do not get. Gut, as they say, is thin. After scrambling on the shoulders of giants rather tedious, not prestigious or even safe. That and look, if you pick the abyss psychiatric hospital or thrown from the sixth floor of the library.
"I do not understand why the fight and with what? - write you. What is the meaning, for what purpose? To rule the roast in science? To pass for a fool among fools (or a fool among fools)? What is offered in exchange? And how you can offer, when offering one hears only himself. For this reason, I do not participate in such events and do not support them. "
Disingenuous, Yuri Nikolaevich! Oh, how cunning! Participate. And even how to participate! "I do not understand why ..." but struggle. And even how to fight! Struggling "to rule the roast in science." Today, Einstein is not only lazy scolds. And you're right there. Is about to collapse relativism. And "in return" - sets you a question. And they themselves are responsible course itself: " RHYTHMODYNAMICS - a new brand of science!". No matter what "nonsense" and not a "brand". And what is your ignorance is worse than ignorance Einstein? Main pseudoscientific product today in vogue. And you know all this better than me, but more expensive than the stomach. Eat from the belly, it turns out, not only wants to relativists, but "rhymed' and other creators' model representations of phenomena ..." Your logic is simple and honest:. Better to be a "madman among fools (or a fool among fools)" so full. And the crowd lined up "models" where "everyone hears only himself," as on Tverskoy Boulevard, in the hope that someone will pick up and use for some time for its intended purpose. Only your vain hopes. Too fresh in the memory of the scientific community obscurantism of relativism and its consequences. I believe you innocent mask with be removed.
However, we must pay tribute to you in self-criticism: "Scope (your ideas) - you write - not obvious demonstration of the phenomena of nature and the ways of deception known laws of physics, and in particular - the mechanics; a spectacular show at the international exhibitions and fairs to attract attention to their uniqueness and novelty of the onlookers, the press and the representatives of the firms to summarize and draw attention to the promoted brand (meaning "nonsense)."
Based on the foregoing, we can conclude that all your claims made against the Russian Academy of Sciences, in full can also be applied to you. It is impossible to even imagine what would happen with the natural sciences, if crowd "models" with "the Boulevard" break in the temple of science. Regarding your statement: "With regard to the obscurantism, the unknowing less obscurantist, who know exactly what." You are in complete solidarity with Oblomov - you turn all the science in the public house with freakout-attendants and clientele. The whole problem of modern science lies in the fact that bigots artificially Stepanov is hundreds and thousands of ignorant creators of all sorts of "model representations of phenomena ...", encouraging them to be elected to the Academy of Natural Sciences, and not only, if only abandoned science - dialectical materialism. Proof of this is,in particular, and the statement of the employee of the laboratory "biophysics", shown in the film "On the exit from the body, and the probability of the existence of a parallel world", that create freakout-lab helped guide Atommashenergiya. Of course, that the activities of the Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics also financed from the budget of Natural Sciences (RAS or?). No wonder that in the relativistic forum SciTecLibrary you sang the praises of " RHYTHMODYNAMICS - a new brand of science!". Very clearly that "nonsense" and not a "brand". But you certainly do not ever give up on this nonsense. Just like you and criticized relativists from their delusions. Because of this, his nonsense you'd like to fuck "Brad End BATE", but with caviar in addition.
It is with your help purposefully kept turmoil in the scientific community, and constrained the promotion of true scientific knowledge.
Yours faithfully, Vladislav Ch.
.............................................................................. ..
Vladislav Borisovich.
You still acknowledge the impossibility of achieving the objective truth never? Do I understand correctly, that the subject of exhaustive answers to the true essence of natural phenomena materialistic science will never reach? those. - will never be able to exhaust the storehouse to the materialist foundation? And if so, why do you think the other way wrong? Why is the path that recognizes the truth elusive and bottomless well of, assumes the right to declare themselves the only correct? Who gave him this right, and where is the logic?
I probably naively, always believed that science stand on the positions of the subjective materialism /http://www.mirit.ru/rd_2007ru.htm#1_nachala/, but learned through you that my position is flawed because odds with some you recognize "intellectual giants". You offer its "Giants" !? I wonder what your esteemed "giants" of the Giants are better than others?
And what exactly do not you like Rhythmodynamics? The fact that its author has managed to fill some mathematical formulas, including Newton, real physical sense, and you - no? (Http://www.mirit.ru/rd_2007ru.htm#6.05). If your face successors of Newton's ideas condemn any unauthorized fantasy, why do you fantasize about sources and drains? For this is that, to register the company Newton enough? Or your fantasies are not your subjective vision of the truth! How are they better than others and why? Explain, please.
Sincerely, Director of
Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences
Yuri Ivanov
....................................................................................................
To Director of Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
Dear Yuri Nikolaevich!
We must pay tribute to you. Usually my opponents after criticism of their "model representations of phenomena ..." say, "fool", and walk away with your head held high in the search sympathizers comforters.
Of course we will treat your Rhythmodynamics from the standpoint of dialectical materialism. Especially because you declare itself "subjective materialist." Of course it is something innovative. There is a concept of subjective idealism, when it is assumed that the world exists only in the imagination of the subject. But you certainly know better.
So, you write: "in order to prove the validity of this dogma, i.e. the material world, it is necessary to present the primary element from which the world was created. The task is difficult and impossible, since but "matter" is still "something" is, therefore, the proof is replaced by sensual beliefs ... ".
Have you ever heard of the materialist views of the inexhaustibility of matter - "the electron is also not exhausted, as the atom - Nature is infinite"? So from the materialistic point of view to bring the primary element is not necessary.
Therefore, your statement is a falsification.
Next you state, "... but" matter "is still" something "...".
Let it be known that from the materialistic point of view in the world is nothing but a moving changing matter. So in this issue you, to put it mildly, are mistaken.
About the "customer information, i.e. "Something" is called the soul ", perhaps, keep silence. Because this is your subjective "materialistic" Pearl does not require comment.
Further. "Receptacle: endless and absolutely empty for anything and exists in itself, not having any effect, nor detention, defies logical comprehension and physical description, i.e. - justification. Property: never be empty. "
You at least you know that writing? "It is absolutely empty ... with the property will never be empty." That "has no effect, nor the content that defies logical comprehension and physical description, i.e. - justification ", is" nothing ". Brilliant definition. If it's empty, "nothing" fill in "the continuum of nothing was not held", we get "subjective materialism, according to Ivanov." One problem. By materialism is "nothing" has nothing to do.
"It is incomprehensible - exclaimed Voltaire - create out of nothing means to transform nothingness into something!"
Finally, "Foundation Axiom: There base as a carrier for constructing (display) of points, straight lines, planes, circles, flat and volumetric shapes. Points, straight lines, circles, planes, flat and three-dimensional figures can not be recorded without the media, even if the media imaginary. "
"Imaginary carrier". That is, a carrier that does not exist and that only exists in your imagination.
Here you also sailed to subjective idealism - "... to anything but confusion and lies," VI, by definition, Lenin.
Resume "? What exactly do not you like Rhythmodynamics" You have brought themselves: "Modern sages such a state of the science at hand: you can collect money for the responses to allegedly relevant to the questions of humanity. And many "wise men" understand that cheating. But to admit this? Not because you want to be expelled from "science", especially when it is only for the "sage" way to earn their daily bread. And God forbid, someone will appear who will show up. "
Answers to your questions.
1. "Do I understand that, and exhaustive answers for the true essence of natural phenomena materialistic science will never reach?".
You see is not correct. We live on an extremely small island universe and give relatively satisfactory at a certain stage of development of science answers to the phenomena that occur in the world around us, and extrapolate this knowledge in micro and macro worlds, where possible. In the process of knowing our ideas are refined, more and more approaching the absolute truth in the knowledge of a phenomenon (without ever exhausting it). A more detailed explanation will find, if desired, in theory cognition dialectic materialism.
2. "... my position is flawed because odds with some you recognize "intellectual giants". You offer its "Giants" !? I wonder what your esteemed "giants" of the Giants are better than others? "
Again, not true. «IN UMERIS GIGAMTUM» ( «on the shoulders of Giants") is said not by me, and the great Newton. Try to guess why he said so, and who at the same mean. You have a vivid imagination. As for the other "giants", the creators of countless "model representations of phenomena ...", where "everyone hears only himself", in comparison with Newton Giants in their emphasis is not visible - a clown, confusion and lies.
3. "... What exactly do not you like Rhythmodynamics? The fact that its author has managed to fill some mathematical formulas, including Newton, real physical sense ... ".
Above I have already shown that you have filled some mathematical formula emptiness, "nothing", meaningless in the real physical sense.
4. "... why do you fantasize about sources and drains? Or your fantasies are not your subjective vision of the truth! "
You asked a question and answered correctly by chance on him. These "fancy" do not belong to me, and Faraday, Maxwell, Engels, Hungarian Academician Ludwig Janos our Barashenkov and Bronstein, Yukawa winner of the Nobel Prize, and many, many others. Do not know about this applicant for a "new brand of science" simply shameful.
Yours faithfully, Vladislav C.
.....................................................................................
Vladislav Borisovich.
Tell me, if a man by nature born sightless, the physics built them in whatever extent reflect the materiality of the world? could convince the blind sighted materialist materialist that there is sun, the moon, the stars? I would have believed him blind, or blind sighted be accused of charlatanism, in non-materialism? After all, the blind from birth ideas about the world more material than for a sighted; probe, - so there! And he's right, because matter - no more than an objectively existing reality as a philosophical category, given to us in sensations blind.
If you sighted a materialist, then explain to me a blind materialist, what is the matter from the point of view of physics and what it matter is specifically (but without the philosophical categories)? If we delve into the matter with a view to achieving the ultimate beginning, and finding the basis, we can in principle achieve this first principle? If you can and have the basis, the world really is material, and if the first principle unattainable than ever, whether we can speak of the origin? If the first principle is not, how do we mortals believe in materialism? Classics have failed to convince me. Can you enlighten, teach ...
Sincerely, Director
Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Yuri Ivanov
PS Where can I get acquainted with your work?
................................................................................................ ..
To Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics’ Director,
Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
Dear Yuri Nikolaevich!
Relatively sensations blind, deaf and dumb, and left our mortal world, materialists answer that the material world exists independently of our sensations, which is really perceived and reflected by our senses. If the blind stumble on the wall, is not he will stuff themselves cone ( "probe, - so there")?
In connection with the above stated, to your question: "If you sighted a materialist, then explain to me a blind materialist, what is the matter from the point of view of physics and what it matter is specifically (but without the philosophical categories)?".
"Materialist blind" explaining that the matter from the point of view of physics, there is a wall and a bump that "blind materialist" filled, bumping about it. If it is up to him at once will not come, the experiment should be repeated as many times as necessary to being determined consciousness.
Matter is just a philosophical category. Unless you did not write about it? "Matter - no more than an objectively existing reality as a philosophical category, given to us in sensations blind." Therefore, without the philosophical categories, we can not do. So, I repeat for the "blind materialist" definition of Engels: "Matter as such is a pure creation of thought or abstraction. We abstract from the qualitative differences of things, when they combine both physically existing under the concept of matter . " This definition is the main axiom of the philosophy of dialectical materialism. Voltaire taught, if we admit the existence of emptiness, we inevitably come to a theism. If we do not admit the existence of emptiness, then we will come and materialism. Matter as such is a hierarchical collection of an infinite set of material objects systems interacting. If we in the apparent "emptiness" choose an arbitrarily small volume and begin to increase it, we will find there the particles. If you continue on and choose an arbitrarily small volume in the "void" between the detected particles and again begin to increase it, then again to find the particle still lower order, and so on ad infinitum. These are the materialistic conception of the structure of matter. Therefore, to achieve the ultimate beginning (the basis) we can not, in principle. Except that only with the help of God, Einstein and Ivanov. If we in the apparent "emptiness" choose an arbitrarily small volume and begin to increase it, we will find there the particles.
You write: "Could sighted materialistic convince a blind materialist that there is sun, the moon, the stars? I would have believed him blind, or blind sighted be accused of charlatanism, in non-materialism? "
You sighted materialist ever seen atoms or electrons? However, you have believed in their existence, and do not blame anyone at this quackery. Therefore, the "materialist sighted could convince a blind materialist that there is the sun, moon and stars," if you learn to interpret correctly.
Me, with the mediation of the chairman of the Ethics Committee of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, Professor Anatoly Alekseyevich Denisov, the brochure "Science needs protection" was published in 1991, ten thousand copies. She was sent, as expected, in many libraries and returned "if not of scientific interest." Trading network refused in its distribution.
However, circulation devided almost all international conferences, according to friends and acquaintances. Materials you already expelled. I hope that you have received them in full.
Science bit by bit over the centuries created great scientists, which Newton called the Giants. Then came the rioters and try to destroy the universal intellectual values, above all, on the basis of short-term considerations. Obscurantism today in the price. Why not take this opportunity to snatch a piece of any fatter. command is given from above - to defend science - and we're there too. In the meantime, a team did not arrive, sorry - own shirt is closer to the body. This, in general, the situation today. And it is necessary to understand - where the roots are growing obscurantism.
Referring to the top, we are pursuing two objectives:
firstly, to put the powers that be aware of the fact that no matter how harnessed Einstein and organizers "model representations of phenomena ..." more than a hundred years, pulling in different directions, and things are there. That the path of relativity and other "model representations of phenomena ..." theories can only be reached nowhere. That a return to the materialist conception of science is inevitable. This self-evident truth, so far, not received by those in power;
secondly, depending on the adopted decisions on horseback, to develop a strategy that would ensure the overcoming of "extraordinary seriousness of the unfortunate consequences of the crisis in natural science for the fate of terrestrial civilization" in this situation.
You have done, of course, a lot of work. To admit that the path has been chosen is not correct, you need to have great courage and have a strong character.
Science Today, more than ever in need of protection. And each of her protector, as they say, its weight in gold.
It is difficult, of course, hope that you will ever get to the truth, which, unfortunately, has become for you, "one of the ways of truth distortion" - "only for" sage "way - as you write - to earn their daily bread" and stand on the protection of Science.
Yours faithfully, Vladislav C.
........................................................................................
Vladislav Borisovich!
How can one defend a scientific approach from the other, offering nothing in return? And if offered, what exactly? Declarative links to questionable authority who in his work skillfully manipulate words and immature minds? Newton even frankly admitted he did not know how the world works, and therefore concluded that no phenomenon of hypotheses can be described in such a way and to such a simplified model. Giant admitted, and followers can never be cut. Belief in authority in science is often only hurts.
As an example, do you distinguish rest from the movement? Two identical resting body, and then one was moved with a constant speed. Are there differences in the states in these bodies? And if there is, then what? Newton could not give an answer to this important question, as I could not answer the question about the causes of mechanism of gravitation. As for the drain and source, these concepts have been used no more than a model representations, facilitates the creation of math apparat.
Sincerely, Director of
Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Yuri N. Ivanov
................................................................................................
To Director of Interdisciplinary Institute Rhythmodynamics,
Academy of Natural Sciences Y.N. Ivanov
Dear Yuri Nikolaevich!
The main feature of scientists from pseudoscientific scams is that the materialistic scientists see themselves as science and obscurantists-idealists - the science for themselves.
We dialectical materialists defend "a single scientific approach" as opposed to numerous fabrications, "offers nothing in return" idealists, for whom the world is a "receptacle completely empty ... not having any effect, neither the content nor the justification ... filled continuum , from nothing consisting skillfully manipulating words and immature consciousness ".
"It is inconceivable (repeat): - exclaimed Voltaire - create out of nothing means to transform nothingness into something!"
Almost from time immemorial, there are two approaches to resolving the fundamental problems of philosophy and science.
First, a scientific approach - the materialistic world. This doctrine seeks to know the truth on the basis of the scientific paradigm, which for centuries has created great scientists-naturalists. This approach allowed to create all without exception, science-based theory that humankind successfully uses in daily practice, and which are trying to cling pseudoscientific frauds from Acad. A.F. Joffe through Acad. Alexandrov, Ginsburg, president of the RAS Academician Osipov and ending. Ivanov - "subjective materialist."
The second - an idealistic direction, which is to your aptly put it considers "truth - as a way of distorting the truth." This approach has been exposed by the classics of dialectical materialism as a pseudoscientific fraud. This trend has no scientifically based or experimental confirmation and is reduced to fraud, confusion and lies. And keep this lie solely on repression used against opponents.
Bearers of these "ideas" are "questionable authorities" who, rejecting dialectical materialism, attempting to impose the scientific community "model representations of the phenomena of ...", which ultimately boil down to a "repository of infinite and absolutely empty, without regard to anything and existing by itself, with neither the fact nor the content, i.e. - justification. With the property will never be empty and filled continuum of nothing never happened. " (Your "manipulation of words and immature minds?".)
Newton deduced the empirical law of universal gravitation based on empirical laws of Kepler and extended it to all gravitating body. Similarly pendant brought empirical law of electrostatics using a torsion balance. However, neither Kepler, neither Newton nor the pendant did not put forward what some of the essential hypotheses (not "represent any simplified model," by you) about the nature of gravity or electrostatics. So anything Newton did not "concluded that the phenomenon of without hypotheses can imagine such a simplified model." The giant did not recognize. And that's why Newton openly and "frankly admitted" and that "he did not invent hypotheses" as the essence of gravity was not clear to him.
In this regard, Voltaire wrote that "Newton could answer all his critics: I use the word" attraction "only to refer to open me naturally authentic and undisputed actions of unknown principle, qualities inherent in matter, the cause of which I present to open, if they it will, the people more skilled than I am. "
But science does not stand still. " Here's the latest act theory Clerk Maxwell, Hankel, Renard, Edlunga in accordance with the expressed already in 1846 for the first time Faraday's hypothesis that electricity - is the movement of a certain filling all space, and, consequently, all the elastic medium permeating the body ... in other words, that the electricity - the movement of particles of ether, and the molecules of bodies are involved in this motion ... in the underlying concept of all of them noticeable decisive progress: the idea that electricity is exerted on the molecules of bodies of the movement egg weighty matter permeates the entire light ether. Ether theory offers hope you to find out which it is in fact the real substratum of electrical motion that actually causes a thing for his motion electrical phenomena.
As we move forward so that we can give the mechanics of the ether, then it is, of course, will go down, and more so that it is now ranked as the need for physics. "
It is in this resolution of the question, "questionable credibility for you," Engels saw decisive progress. But you certainly do not understand. Because "faith in the authority of science you only harm."
Faraday and Maxwell was hypothesized and formulate the problem that the interaction of material objects due to emission and absorption of ether material particles flows. This idea was by no means a free invention of "a handful of dubious authority" - "nothing more than a model representation, facilitates the creation of math apparat" and was the result of generalization of numerous experimental data and observations of the world around us. These materialist views received convincing confirmation of the analytical resolution of problems of Faraday and Maxwell, presented me in the study. But you, pseudoscientific frauds of this evidence in an emphasis do not see. Because this confirmation obscurantists imposed a final sentence undeniable collapse of all their idealistic fast talker.
And the last. Materialism does not recognize "a state of absolute rest," because the material world objects are in constant relative motion and change under the influence of the interaction forces, which under certain conditions can be balanced.
"Newton was not able to give an answer to this important question, as I could not answer the question about the causes of mechanism of gravity" - you write.
Newton did not give. And a lot of what not to give. For example, the atomic bomb. But unlike you, he did not invent, and you do not advise. However, his followers gave you detailed answers to all your questions, including "on the difference between the rest of the movement," and "of mechanism causes gravity", against which you even have nothing to argue, and those "which wanted to answer Newton himself. "
In conclusion, on behalf of the international scientific community, we express our gratitude to you for assistance in exposing your face to the academic elite pseudoscientific swindlers of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, as our discussion is the clearest proof of that.
Yours faithfully, Vladislav C.
P.S. The absurdity of the barbaric destruction of science, persecution and extermination of the best minds of humanity have led to the fact that the field of knowledge overgrown weeds pseudoscientific fabrications: Einstein, Ioffe, Alexandrov Ginsburg, Osipova, Fortova, Ivanovo, Smirnov and other creators of "model representations of phenomena on ...". They all share a fierce hatred for the true scientific knowledge and to the greatest scientist, who for centuries have little by little this knowledge is identified, collected and compiled. Attempts to silence, confusion of perversion of truth and falsehood, and bans most severe crackdown on dissent - have become the main weapon of obscurantists.
In order to confuse and deceive public opinion pseudoscientific swindlers encourage ignorant creators with contempt relating to intelligent human values, to the generation of many "model representations of phenomena ...", where "everyone hears only himself," according to their own declaration. They do not even forbidden to scold Einstein, with only one condition, that their own "discovery" was no less delusional than the postulates of relativity. What I did not hear a lot these international congresses and symposia! And the expulsion of rats meditation method, and the transmigration of souls, and to increase the productivity of prayer. These "questionable authorities" was elected to the Academy, their cooking announce "new brands in Science" and appoint the directors of "scientific" establishments. These mutants of science has finally lost to society.
But it is necessary at conferences to slip even a spark of common sense, as here there are problems with the publication of materials, attempts are made to destroy the circulation and repressive measures to the organizers.
"Often I ask, - wrote the great Voltaire - why those who are serving their commands to be scientists and patient, so were often ignorant and heartless. They were ignorant because studied for too long and cruel because they felt like their worthless classes become an object of contempt of the wise men. "
Today, we are entering into an unequal battle against obscurantism. And the victim on our side is inevitable. Our predecessors and followers, or have been, and are being persecuted, or come in psychiatric hospitals or already are in the graves.
Meanwhile, pseudo-scientific fraternity continues to feast during the plague. And obscurantism voluntarily from this revelry are not easy to give up ever, because the century-old lies, the unscrupulousness and impunity have created in them a sense of confidence in the absolute success of the application to the opponents of the Jesuit methods of suppressing the resistance.
But somebody has to show civil courage and call here all their names, scientists urge the scientific community to unite, because we are "obviously thousands, and possibly millions," as evidenced by the progressive magazine "Inventor". Our cause is just, the victory will be ours!
Those who come after us and will succeed, we must not forget that many of those who are oppressed by scientists mimic tomorrow and will convince everyone that secretly supported by science, because "no one making his profession quackery can not have an accurate and a clear mind. " Voltaire.
These werewolves allow science can not in any case.
Dostları ilə paylaş: | 
