[]

4.9 About the mechanical nature of the interaction of electromagnets and magnets

Consider first the metal cylinder consisting of a set maxi- sources and maximum runoff. If the cylinder is not acted upon by external forces, the maxi- sources and maximum runoff arranged randomly inside. However, if placed in a cylinder coil - coil and pass an electric current, the stream of electrons (mini sources) around the conductors will cause transverse circular streams ether (see Study 3.6).

Total ether transverse circular streams form along the cylinder axis of the closed circulating stream of ether, as shown in Fig. 4.9.1. dotted lines with arrows. These streams impacting maxi- sources drains and maximum cylinder will cause rotation of their axes drains toward the oncoming flow. The set of longitudinal threads elliptic ether maxi- sources and maximum create additional closed circulating elliptical tube ether streams along the cylinder axis as shown in Fig. 4.9.1.

Now, if we remove the coil - coil, the induced electrical current - electron beam (mini sources) orientation maxi- sources and maximum effluent remain in a metal cylinder certain time. And, therefore, the metal cylinder will continue to possess magnetic properties. Such magnets are called magnetostatic, unlike the previously discussed above electromagnet. EXAMPLE magnetic field (flow velocity field ester) by reacting magnetostatic two cylinders is shown in Fig. 4.9.2. magnets cooperation will naturally take place under the same rules as in the study 3.8. That is the same name the poles tend to be repelled and attracted to oppositely charged.

Maxwell's quote: "If each cell, i.e. maxi- source or drain maxi- (see section 3.6) is a part of a continuous cell system, the fluid flowing out of one cell will flow into the subsequent and so on, so that our sources can be moved from the ends of the cells on the ends of individual tubes.

If all individual tubes begin and end on the cell surface of the system, the sources will be based only on the surface; therefore the magnet, wherein the distribution of the magnetism is so-called a solenoidal, or tubular, the entire free magnetism on the surface.

Here, however, the study will have solution to the problem of how single cells in the fluid motion can present the polarity of the elementary magnets. The unit of the amount of liquid streams through one side of each cell and streams out through the opposite. Thus, with respect to the rest of the liquid mass of the first side of the cell is a liquid drain unit, the second - the source. Thus, each cell corresponds to an elementary magnet, the sides of which are covered respectively with equal amounts of north and south magnetism. "

Section 3.6 shows the mechanical model of "how single cells in the fluid motion can present the polarity of the elementary magnets". Thus, the study allows us to solve the main issue, so agitated Maxwell and justify the mechanical nature of magnetism.

Indeed maxi- sources and drains maxi- form on the surface of the metal cylinder from the south pole (S) - a source of liquid, and on the opposite surface from the north pole (N) - Drain liquid. That is "the whole free magnetism on the surface", as required in accordance with the views of Faraday and Maxwell.

In section A-A shows the direction of longitudinal movement and rotation of the annular stream ether maxi- sources and maximum effluent formation mechanism which is presented in section 3.6.

maxi-source

N


S maxi- drain

Fig. 4.9.1

maxi-sources
N

magnet I

А S А

N

magnet II

maxi-drains

S

А-А

Fig. 4.9.2

4.10 The increase in relativistic mass - the result of misinterpretation of the experiment

Let us turn to modern views on the merits of the issue.

Common sense dictates that if in space experiments and streams of charged and uncharged particles, moving at speeds comparable to the speed of light, acquired such monstrous mass, then they would have to sweep away everything in its path. However, nothing of the kind is observed. The trouble is that relativists do not recognize "the proverbial common sense." "This theory is not crazy enough to be true" - they proclaim. Madness - that's the credo of their pseudo-theories.

Now consider the description of the experiment, which, allegedly, shows an increase of relativistic mass of charged particles. (Description of the experiment is taken from the book "Modern Physics". R. Sproul, M. 1974)

" The first experiments that determined the nature of the mass changes  depending on the speed , holding by Bucherer, Volz and Neumann. Neumann instrument schematically depicted in Fig.4.10.1

          

1 2 3 4

+

_ А

В

                

                                                            

Fig. 4.10.1

- the magnetic induction vector  directed perpendicular to the picture plane from the observer. The two parallel electrodes 3 disposed at a distance , Summed up the voltage . Radium source 1 emits electrons from the charge of high energy. The photographic plate 4 displays electrons hitting places. In the device a vacuum. In the absence of electric and magnetic fields, electrons flying in the screen aperture 2 fall on the photographic plate at the point A (equal to several hours of exposure). Then the superimposed electric and magnetic fields. Electrical and magnetic forces are oppositely directed, and therefore creates a velocity selector. Any electron passing through the selector device should have a relatively rate

(4.10.1)

Once the electrons exit from the velocity selector, they are under the influence of a magnetic force a constant equal to  

(4.10.2)

and directed perpendicular to the velocity . That's why accelerating constant in magnitude and directed perpendicular to the . Just under this condition the electron orbit is a circular arc. Movement of a circle of radius requires centripetal acceleration , Constant in magnitude and everywhere perpendicular to the path. Consequently,

(4.10.3)

from whence 

(4.10.4)

However, experiments have shown the more voltage was applied and the magnetic field was applied, i.e., at a higher speed than the electrons were selected, the greater the radius of deflection of the electrons in the experiments of the theoretical calculation. The impression was that the electron mass begins to increase rapidly with increasing speed.

This fact took advantage of relativists, entering fit unfounded correction factor in Equation 4.10.4 for allegedly justify the theory of relativity. That is, taking into account the "relativistic correction factor", we get:

(4.10.5)

When it comes to slowing or decreasing the length of time in moving reference systems, application coefficient SRT settles in at least absurd terminal of the Lorentz transformation. But what to stations can have the correction factor for the increase in the mystical moving mass of particles? It is not clear and is not justified - the purest fabrication.

Consider the same experiment with the application of research results Faraday-Maxwell mechanical model of interaction.

In reality, however, has been found in the research section 4.10, decreases the total force acting on the charged particles in a magnetic field with an increase in the speed of their movement, not weight.

We write the equation for the source - electron applied to the conditions of the experiment.

  
(4.10.6)

from whence

(4.10.7)

Similarly, an equation for Photo

(4.10.8)

From equations (4.10.7) and (4.10.8), it follows that with increasing speed increasing the magnitude of the angle and the force acting on the charges reduced. In the limit, when , This force tends to zero. As it is observed in the experiments.

The results of this study make it possible to expose the failure of Einstein's scientific speculation about the dependence of the mass of charged particles from their relativistic speeds. In reality, as evidenced by the results of this study, the velocity decreases with increasing value of the total force acting on the charged particle in a magnetic field.