Aa history Lovers 2009 moderators Nancy Olson and Glenn F. Chesnut page



Yüklə 11,49 Mb.
səhifə27/74
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü11,49 Mb.
#49237
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   74
Since the 24 Hour book (like the Bible!)

is not Conference-approved, how did sending

profits from its sale to GSO (between 1948

and 1954, when it was being printed under

the sponsorship of the Daytona Beach AA

Group) square with Tradition Seven?


Laurie A.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5687. . . . . . . . . . . . Mike Wallace Interview with Lillian

Roth (1956)

From: Bill Lash . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 2:03:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
The interview may be seen on your computer as a video at:
http://solstice.ischool.utexas.edu/tmwi/index.php/Lillian_Roth
- - - -
A TRANSCRIPT OF THIS VIDEO:
THE MIKE WALLACE INTERVIEW

Guest: Lillian Roth

Saturday, April 5, 1958

WALLACE: Good evening. Tonight we go after the latest chapter in the story

of

a woman who fought her way back from alcoholism and despair, to become again



one of the most compelling figures in show business. She is Lillian Roth, a

million dollar film star at eighteen, an alcoholic at thirty, a great torch

singer only five years ago and today a woman with a new story to tell.
If you're curious to know why Lillian Roth says that the past five years

have


been among the most difficult in her life, if you want to hear her thoughts

on

her conversion to Catholicism, and if you want to know why Miss Roth says



that

despite her recent success, she is forever trying to fill what she calls an

aching, a frightening void within herself, we'll go after those stories in

just


a moment. My name is Mike Wallace, the cigarette is Parliament.
(OPENING CREDITS)
WALLACE: We'll talk with Lillian Roth in just a moment.
(COMMERCIAL)
WALLACE: And now to our story. Several years ago, an all but forgotten

entertainer by the name of Lillian Roth, wrote a brutally frank

autobiography

called I'll Cry Tomorrow. It was made into a successful Hollywood film. Miss

Roth herself was swamped with offers to appear in television, nightclubs.

Since then Miss Roth has forged a new life, which she has written about in a

new

book, to be published later this month, called Beyond My Worth.


Lillian, first of all, let me ask you this: After your remarkable comeback a

few years ago I'd imagine that the general public's impression of you is

that

of a happy and successful woman, who has finally found her way. Yet, in your



new book, Beyond My Worth you wrote this: you said: "I've had mornings

recently


when I woke up and my whole life seemed in chaos and I've said to myself,

I've


fallen back... I've fallen back again." Why have you felt that way?
ROTH: Well, Mike, I guess it's something that stems from my childhood. I've

never quite felt up to of the many amazing things that happened to me. I've

never felt at school that I was as pretty as the next child, or as clever as

the


next child, and anytime anything happens to me, I just thought it was luck.

And that was mostly all through my life, and if I did a performance and the

audience were wonderful to me, I thought it really wasn't good enough, it

could


have been better. I've never felt quite adequate, and because...
WALLACE: And so even now, in spite of the fact that you have overcome what

obstacles you have overcome...


ROTH: Well, you see, when I say: Beyond My Worth, I honestly feel I haven't

done anything extraordinary. The public has been amazing. I've gotten mail

from all over the world you'd think I was a miracle woman. And I'm not! It's

through these people and with the help of God that I have been able to

overcome

so much, but the inadequacy and the guilt within me is still very strong and

many times I feel I'm just not what they... I'm not what I seem to be.
WALLACE: I gather that you find a real responsibility, an awesome

responsibility in the very fact of your comeback.


ROTH: I think that the battle of success is probably more difficult than the

climb. People expect too much from you -- or rather, you want to be all that

people expect from you, I shouldn't say that they expect too much of me

because


they're pretty good about it -- But it isn't only that you have to deliver

the


gift of your entertainment as the good Lord gifted you, but there are other

things in your life and I've never professed to be a saint or a martyr.

There

are many people in the world overcoming greater problems which I tell of in



Beyond My Worth. But comparatively speaking, mine seems simple, but this

inner


conflict, this inner thing that I have, I think too telling the truth about

it

makes people realize that they're not alone. You see people used to be able



to

say, "Lillian, let me help you up," after I took that first long step alone.


WALLACE: Yes.
ROTH: But now, through the mail I've started to feel that people were

wondering if they could talk up there to me. And I'm not up there; I don't

want to be up there where the people are concerned only as a performer. I

want


to be right alongside with them.
WALLACE: You get a tremendous number of letters, I gather, calls from people

who are also in a kind of pain, and trying to find their way and figure

you've

done it, and perhaps you can help them to find it for themselves.


ROTH: Well, I... it isn't just problem letters I get. After all I'm not the

know-all, see-all, and I haven't the answer to everything, but the type mail

I

get comes from psychiatrists, doctors, writers, priests, ministers, and



there

are lonely ministers, nuns, and priests all over the world and I can read

between their lines too, and they think that this certainly shows the grace

of

God being bestowed and my difference of course is that I don't think God



graces

one person and not the next. But I am very grateful for their affection.


WALLACE: Tell me this: Does the fear of sliding back, of hitting rock-bottom

again, does that worry you, or do you feel you're over that hump?


ROTH: Well, they say that... I mean, even if you should slip back a little,

it

isn't really slipping back. If you fall slightly, that's just another step



up.

I mean to step down is to step up. Sometimes we're forced to be knocked down

a

little bit, and then we gather our forces together, and we're that much



stronger when we go again. I don't think... I think once you've hit the

bottom


you're not afraid down there. You just feel you don't want to disappoint

people.
WALLACE: Of course one of the things that sparked your comeback was your

book,

I'll Cry Tomorrow... and I'm sure this latest book, which is also quite



revealing, will do your career no harm. Let me ask you this: Did you never

think it undignified, Lillian; did you never think it in bad taste for a

woman

to write so candidly of her personal life and of the life of others?


ROTH: Truthfully, I wasn't happy about any of it... I think I told you when

I

spoke to you a year ago... there's no glory in being a glorified alcoholic.



If

these were the steps I had to take, and there seemed to be a force that

worked

it out... I know when I first worked on my book coming from Australia 10



years

ago, and through the years -- speaking of I'll Cry Tomorrow -- I shelved it.

I

closed the book and said: 'That woman!'


But after this is your life, After Ralph had prevailed on me, and even there

I

didn't want to do it. I was hesitant. It was terrible panic when I first



went

to Australia. It... it just isn't a good feeling to know that you have other

gifts, but I rated what was done. I mean, I rated the fact that I didn't

deserve any better than to be called an alcoholic and I don't know why I

should

have expected extra...


WALLACE: But, why did you want to write about it? Why did you want to tell

and, and not only about yourself, but you wrote fairly graphically about,

for

instance, about being beaten by one husband, about your wedding night with



another husband, a fairly prominent man, about emotional scenes with your

mother. Why have... why did you find it necessary to write about these

things?
ROTH: Well I didn't feel that I was writing an expose, I felt I was

disclosing

rather than exposing. My husband felt from the inception that if I wrote

everything out... I remember when I first went to a hospital for slightly

mentally unbalanced, from 12, 13 years ago, I said even then I wanted to

write a


book... but then they told me everybody that comes in here has a book to

write.


So I kept it to myself for some time. But Bert told me it isn't a case of

being


a martyr. He said this, "In telling all and freeing yourself, and the world

being a big jury, they're very fair; and in doing that, maybe somebody along

to

this will be helped." I'm not going to tell you that my thought was I'm



going

to go out and be a martyr now and help the world. I didn't feel that way; I

was

frightened to death when this book came out.


WALLACE: Diana Barrymore, who wrote a somewhat similar book, told us that

she


did it as a catharsis to get the past out of her system. Was that...? You

smile when I say that.


ROTH: Well, I really... I'm not living my past any more. I'm creating new

thoughts and new habits. A priest once told me, this may answer it by a

thought, that there are certain bad characteristics or formation of a bad

character that is always there with bad habits, but you can create good

habits

and work on them so often that you form a new character and I feel that



if...

I'm not speaking, necessarily about Miss Barrymore, but anyone that

continues to

live as they lived in the past, isn't doing anything to send out a message

or

to help someone in distress. Not that they have to. But what is the sense of



the book? If you're going to go to all this embarrassment, you might be

helpful while doing it. And I... I think it has... well, I shouldn't speak

about what it's proven, but it has helped many people be able to overcome

certain pain that they've had.


WALLACE: I'm certain of that. Have you ever wondered, though, why the

American public seems to be so fascinated with this kind of story? Is it

possibly just the desire to look... to look across the courtyard into

somebody


else's open window?
ROTH: Well, I think where my story is concerned, it goes back to an old

philosophy that I read that said, "In each man's heart there's a secret

sorrow

that the world knows nothing about." And often we call a man 'cold' when



he's

really just sad. And I think that humanity feels that their sorrow is for

you

and their compassion is for you, but it has touched a part of their hearts



that

they will not open the door themselves. They won't even begin... and in the

subconscious the tie is there...
WALLACE: They see a little of themselves in you and that is why they want to

read and hear and...


ROTH: Yes, and... and even youngsters that write to me, they tell me they

understand the problems at home more and I just think it's reached, that's

all.
WALLACE: Let's look at some of the things you write about. One of them,

which


helped you rehabilitate yourself, has been religion. In your new book, you

write with complete assurance... "God loves me." How do you know He does?


ROTH: Because I think God is all loving, just as a parent would be, that

they


love their children good, bad or indifferent. And it's often been said, I

believe, sum and substance of the Bible is that little black sheep that

strayed

away, that worries him so very much, He hopes it will come back some day.


WALLACE: Lillian, who is God?
ROTH: God is everything that's quite wonderful and the... you know I always

quote because I think that the authenticity of a thing... After all I'm a

new

writer, I don't even know if I have a great talent except of telling of



myself

and giving of myself. But a man like Emerson says that God made... almost

everything He made had a crack in it... and I thought that was such a good

thought. We have... we don't have this feeling of perfection, but to please

Him

we'd like to improve ourselves. And I think he's all loving and he's always



there, we just don't always know it.
WALLACE: Let me pursue this a little more specifically. You were born into a

Jewish family, yet several years ago you converted to Catholicism. Why was

Judaism apparently unsatisfactory, unfulfilling for you?
ROTH: Oh, I don't think that Judaism was a case of unfulfillment, I think

that


Catholicism is a fulfillment of Judaism as far as the acceptance of the

Messiah. It... My only difficulty has been in the last two years with all my

respect to the Church because it doesn't make me right and the Church wrong,

I

can't go in and say now this is Lillian's way of doing it. I just felt that



certain man made dogma little things simple as a child. They say "Come as

little children." Well, some of the little flaws or that I felt were flaws,

flaws within myself -- the question -- were child like things, and I have

never


denied my Judaism and as a matter of fact, I learned...
WALLACE: But how -- wait -- How can you convert from Judaism to Catholicism

and yet not deny your Judaism?


ROTH: Well, of course, I have a different theory. I believe that an

Irishman's an Irishman, a Jew is a Jew, an American-Irishman, American Jew.

I

can't see saying that it is merely a religion, I don't go along with that. I



think Christ on the Cross which I spoke to you last time was a Jew who never

denied his Judaism and Christian came from the word "Follower of Christ" and

so

therefore that's an acceptance of the Jewish Messiah and he stated he came



to

fulfill the law, so I don't see where there's a denial of Judaism or... how

can

you deny what you are?


WALLACE: You didn't feel the least bit disloyal when you turned from Judaism

as a religion to Catholicism as a religion?


ROTH: Well, in this way, the physical sense, the material sense, I do

believe


there is a time in the Bible that Christ says that "They will mock you in my

name sake and that..." and it did come in the minority. People were very

good

about it, they didn't care how I found God as long as I had Him, but I don't



think there was too much resentment. I did have feelings of guilt but I

would


have to rise above it and try to get into a spiritual way and to my own self

be

true. You know Mike, they wrote about you in the LaGorian which Father



Clyber

who is a Jew and a priest convert to Catholicism and he sends me the

LaGorian

and it's strange, a few weeks ago they had an article where you asked the

Catholic Church some questions.
WALLACE: Yes.
ROTH: While I was reading it, I also read an article about the face... Five

Faces of a Hypocryte and I thought to myself, one of the things were those

that

professed to be a Christian, you know, and wear the face of a hypocrite, and



I

thought that went along with my thinking, that if I were to take and to

continue taking sacraments, at a time when I felt in the eyes of God, I

didn't


go along with it, I would be wearing that face of a hypocrite. And, although

I'm lonely, not belonging at the moment...


WALLACE: You... Have you forsaken Catholicism now?
ROTH: Well I... I hope God hasn't forsaken me, that's the main point and I

feel that in conscience I can look up to Him and that what is right to do,

he

will lead me to. One wonderful thing about the Catholics and the Catholic



Church, and my own people too is that they don't desert you, you may desert

them


but they say you shall be back. But I think it's along the lines of wherever

the good Lord wants you, that's where you'll be.


WALLACE: You were a member of Alcoholics Anonymous?
ROTH: Yes.
WALLACE: Did you regard that...? -- are you still a member of AA?
ROTH: Well I follow the principles. I believe with AA, of course I don't

advise this for a newcomer, but I think just as you get well, after you come

out

of a hospital, I don't think that you have to sit in the hospital, come back



every day; I think you use the medicines and in this case it's the

suggestions

and principles of AA.
WALLACE: Did you regard...? -- Do members of AA regard it themselves as kind

of a religion?


ROTH: No, to the best of my knowledge, they believe that AA will direct

people


back to their own religions or give them some spiritual contact with God.
WALLACE: Back in 1955, one of the co-founders of Alcoholics Anonymous wrote

a

thought provoking pamphlet in which he warned former alcoholics against,



resuming what he called, quote: "our old and disastrous pursuit of personal

power and prestige, public honors and money." He suggested that these are

egotistical, self-seeking ephemeral things and if the alcoholic or the

former


alcoholic were to lose them again, that could shatter a person all over

again.


Now you are a fairly ambitious woman. Do you ever feel that perhaps you're

pushing... pursuing the dangerous course now in going after prestige, money,

public honor once again?
ROTH: Well I'm pretty sure that when the good Lord put us on this earth, he

knew that there were human footsteps to take and he certainly doesn't want

us

to be a ward of a state. Whatever our job is, whether we're a truck driver



and

go back to trucking, or a waitress go back to the waitress. Every job is

important in life and mine was to go back to singing and as I said earlier,

there's no glory in it. Now, these rules that you read; you see, when I

joined

AA there was no such thing as a rule. There were suggestions. I wasn't



anonymous, I... when I was drinking, of course, and I didn't wish this type

publicity but I have found the press to be fair. I've said it over and over

again: it came out and they could just, as well, have gone to the morgue and

dug


up any story. I don't think that there is glory in saying: Look, I want a

lot


of gold stars; I want to be up in lights 'cause I'm a cured alcoholic. I

mean,


it's a little bit ridiculous, I feel that I'm now after 5 years or 12 years

that


I have had my sobriety, free from the bonds of sympathy. I don't feel if the

public comes back three and four times or I'm asked to appear places that

many

times that they come back to see what an alcoholic that doesn't drink



anymore

looks like.


WALLACE: Lillian in a moment I'd like to ask you about something that you

write of quite movingly in your new book. You write, "All people go through

life with a void inside them." You write that even love and marriage

probably


doesn't vanish entirely that feeling of aloneness, of lostness; you say,

"The


void seems to remain during life." I'd like to know why you say that. And

we'll get Lillian Roth's answer in just 60 seconds.


(COMMERCIAL)
WALLACE: Lillian, in your book you write, "Within us, there seems to be an

aching, a frightening void we are forever trying to fill but never quite do.

We're always alone." What do you mean?
ROTH: You've never felt that feeling?
WALLACE: Uh-huh.
ROTH: Well, with the hundreds of people, the thousands of people I've met,

it's a strange empathy I guess I get and maybe at times contrary to belief,

I'm

subject to a slight melancholia but I look across a room at a person and



somehow

the way the shoulder is, a certain look in his face, the age of the face, I

know that the man has lived a life that hasn't had any great joy in it but

he's


worked very hard. I never saw Death of a Salesman but I imagine the

expression

that I've seen on the pictures of that man's face, I've seen in so many

faces


and you want to go over and say, "Oh, I want to do something, say something

to

you."


And also I feel that when two people love each other and are married, the

ache


of loneliness for someone that's gone that you wish could be part of this

and


they're not there anymore to see it, your parents or your loved ones can see

all


this, and also if you have your separate little problems and you don't want

to

put it on one another. You don't want to tell the fears. Lots of times, --



and Bert probably is watching tonight, he's in California, he hasn't been

too


well and it's our first time we've been apart in 12 years but you see we're

not


really apart -- but a lot of times does that void... he may have an ache or

pain, he says, "I don't want to tell Lillian." I may have a certain worry, I

think he almost made me come to New York so that I wouldn't be there to

worry;


but it's not just me or just Bert, it's... I don't know whether it's a

longing


to a return properly, Freud said: to the mother... the original birth state

or

to a humanity and those of the Church who are so longing to return to God,



but

we are surely never complete here on this earth.


WALLACE: Are you going to...? -- Do you believe that you will find your

completeness after life?


ROTH: Oh well, I certainly hope and I feel like I'm on the verge of some

discovery and I don't like to delve too much because I don't want to go back

to

Bloomingdale's, they'll say this gal is odd, but I know that Lecomte du



Noüy you

recall the book that fascinated me so, the physicist that wrote Human

Destiny,

he said that the odd person of today is just the normal person, you know a

century from now when you have these dreams and ideals. And I think all

those


wonderful stars and planets that we're trying to reach so hard, we're going

to

sit all around them one day in the hereafter and those will be the different



stages until we'll reach our final place.
WALLACE: You mentioned Freud. Have you ever thought about analysis?
ROTH: Well I did have a doctor, A. A. Bill who passed away... sent me to the

original place to rest my little mind when I was thirty-four years old and

up

there they didn't believe in my particular case that there should be deep



analysis. They feel that it takes about a year and a half and if you can't

discover what's wrong in a year and a half, that's bad. And if it takes any

longer, it's real bad. If there's nothing wrong, there will be something

wrong


and I don't mean to interfere with the psychoanalysis but that was Doctor

Bill's


advice where I was concerned.
WALLACE: Lillian, when you add it all up, all of the tragic things that have

happened to you, all of the unhappiness that rarely comes to one human

being,

and I ask this question perfectly seriously, have you ever or do you now



ever

regret the fact that you were born?


ROTH: No, no. Look I knew my mother and I knew my father and so many

wonderful people, I think it's all been worth it. I think I have a greater

appreciation for life than I ever had with all my little hesitancies, a

greater


gratitude. I'm gradually learning more compassion and understanding and I

just


hope I can be. I don't intend to be or hope to be a saint but I hope I can,

in

some measure, repay the good that's come to me. And, I don't mean that as a



Pollyanna or Little Orphan Annie glad all over, Annie Rooney, is that it? I

just think that I... I think life has been very good to me and it takes

those

steps to give you that appreciation.


WALLACE: Lil, what makes you happiest?
ROTH: Well I don't think that there's any way to judge a complete happiness.

I don't think there's such a thing as "happiness". I know my little dogs

though, you know our two little dogs out on the coast, and I got very

lonesome... Do you think I have time to...?


WALLACE: I'm sorry we only have about fifteen seconds.
ROTH: Oh... well I have the cutest little things about dogs. I think that we

all get a great joy from the animals... one thing in the world that loves

you

without question.


WALLACE: Lillian, thank you for coming and spending this half hour and I

know


lots of people who want to read your new book Beyond My Work.
ROTH: Thank you, Mike.
WALLACE: Few come back stories have been as compelling as Lillian Roth's,

perhaps because it seems to be a story that has no end, no artificial happy

conclusion. Miss Roth's comeback has been in the truest sense the search for

her self. It has also been an inspiration for other searchers. I'll be back

in a moment with a rundown on next week's guest, one of the world's youngest

and


most embattled diplomats from one of the world's youngest and most embattled

countries.


(COMMERCIAL)
WALLACE: Next week we go after the story of violence in the Middle East, the

threat to world peace from hostility between the Arabs and Israel. Our guest

will be the Israeli Ambassador to the United States and the United Nations,

Abba


Eban. If you're curious to know Ambassador Eban's answer to the Arab charge

that Israel endangers world peace through a policy of war like expansion,

and

his reply to the Arab statement that his country, Israel must eventually go



bankrupt, we'll go after those stories on the eve of Israel's tenth

anniversary

as a nation next week. Till then for Parliament, Mike Wallace. Good night.
ANNCR: The Mike Wallace Interview has been brought to you by the new High

Filtration Parliament. Parliament! Now for the first time at popular price.


(CLOSING CREDITS)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5688. . . . . . . . . . . . Travis, Language of the Heart

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 4:26:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
By Trysh Travis
The Language of the Heart: A Cultural History

of the Recovery Movement from Alcoholics

Anonymous to Oprah Winfrey
University of North Carolina Press, January 2010
http://www.uncpress.unc.edu/browse/book_detail?title_id=1647
In The Language of the Heart Trysh Travis

explores the rich cultural history of

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and its offshoots

and the larger "recovery movement" that has

grown out of them. Moving from AA's beginnings

in the mid-1930s as a men's fellowship that

met in church basements to the thoroughly

commercialized addiction treatment centers

of today, Travis chronicles the development

of recovery and examines its relationship to

the broad American tradition of self-help,

highlighting the roles that gender, mysticism,

and print culture have played in that

development.


Travis draws on hitherto unexamined materials

from AA's archives as well as a variety of

popular recovery literatures. Her analysis

traces AA's embrace of the concept of addiction

as disease, the rise of feminist sobriety

discourse and the codependence theories of

the 1970s and 80s, and Oprah Winfrey's

turn-of-the-millennium popularization of

metaphysical healing. What unites these varied

cultures of recovery, Travis argues, is their

desire to offer spiritual solutions to problems

of gender and power.


Treating self-help seekers as individuals whose

intellectual and aesthetic traditions are worth

excavating, The Language of the Heart is the

first book to attend to the evolution and

variation found within the recovery movement

and to treat recovery with the attention to

detail that its complexity requires.
- - - -
Referred to in:
Message #5678
Re: the 24 Hour book and spirituality vs. religion
From: "trysh travis"

(trysh.travis at gmail.com)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5689. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Travis, Language of the Heart

From: jenny andrews . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 7:53:00 AM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Dear Trysh,
I've been following historylovers correspondence re 24 Hour book and read yr

contribution with interest; I also look forward to reading "The Language of

the

Heart", the same title that the Grapevine gave to its compilation of Bill



W's

writings, which might confuse some AA's!


The blurb says your book records, inter alia, "AA's embrace of the concept

of

addiction as disease." Apart from the fact that AA sticks to its experience



of

alcoholism and does not generalise about the nature of addiction, let me

quote

my letter which was published in the March 2004 Grapevine, viz: "The



November

2003 Grapevine loosely conflates disease with illness. The first 164 pages

of

the Big Book refer to alcoholism as illness or malady, rather than disease.



As

Bill W. said, when he addressed the National Clergy Conference on Alcoholism

in

1960, 'We (AA) have never called alcoholism a disease because, technically



speaking, it is not a disease entity. For example, there is no such thing as

heart disease. Instead there are many separate heart ailments or

combinations of

them. It is something like that with alcoholism. Hence, we did not wish to

get

in wrong with the medical profession by pronouncing alcoholism as a disease



entity. Therefore, we call it an illness, or malady - a far safer term for

us to


use.' A few years ago, the General Service Office in New York said in a

letter


to me: 'Our role as a society of recovered alcoholics helping others does

not


endow us with any mediacal or scientific stature. Therefore, the issue of a

medical determination of a disease is something on which AA could not have a

position.' If a physician said I had the disease of diabetes and that my

only


hope of recovery was a spiritual awakening, I would demand a second opinion.

We

can use disease as a metaphor for alcoholism, as in 'other spiritual



diseases'

(Big Book); but given the different theories about the causes of alcoholism,

the

Fellowship would do well not to claim any special medical expertise and thus



avoid being drawn into this controversy, as Tradition Ten suggests." (saved

on

Grapevine digital archive).


The distinction between disease and illness is explored in John Crossan's

book,


"Jesus: a revolutionary biography" - Harper Collins.
Treatment centres have their own reasons for claiming all addictions are the

same, and that alcoholism is a disease. It would be unfortunate if your book

suggested AA took the same view.
Abundant blessings,
Laurie A. (DOS 8/10/84)
- - - -
Original Message #5688
By Trysh Travis
The Language of the Heart: A Cultural History

of the Recovery Movement from Alcoholics

Anonymous to Oprah Winfrey
University of North Carolina Press, January 2010
http://www.uncpress.unc.edu/browse/book_detail?title_id=1647
In The Language of the Heart Trysh Travis

explores the rich cultural history of

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and its offshoots

and the larger "recovery movement" that has

grown out of them. Moving from AA's beginnings

in the mid-1930s as a men's fellowship that

met in church basements to the thoroughly

commercialized addiction treatment centers

of today, Travis chronicles the development

of recovery and examines its relationship to

the broad American tradition of self-help,

highlighting the roles that gender, mysticism,

and print culture have played in that

development.


Travis draws on hitherto unexamined materials

from AA's archives as well as a variety of

popular recovery literatures. Her analysis

traces AA's embrace of the concept of addiction

as disease, the rise of feminist sobriety

discourse and the codependence theories of

the 1970s and 80s, and Oprah Winfrey's

turn-of-the-millennium popularization of

metaphysical healing. What unites these varied

cultures of recovery, Travis argues, is their

desire to offer spiritual solutions to problems

of gender and power.


Treating self-help seekers as individuals whose

intellectual and aesthetic traditions are worth

excavating, The Language of the Heart is the

first book to attend to the evolution and

variation found within the recovery movement

and to treat recovery with the attention to

detail that its complexity requires.
- - - -
Referred to in:
Message #5678
Re: the 24 Hour book and spirituality vs. religion
From: "trysh travis"

(trysh.travis at gmail.com)


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5690. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Travis, Language of the Heart

From: Fiona Dodd . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 4:51:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Actually disease is mentioned on page 64 of

The Big Book. "Resentment is the "number one

offender". It destroys more alcoholics than

anything else. From it stems all forms of

spiritual disease, for we have been not only

mentally and physically ill, we have been

spiritually sick." And AA number 3, Bill D

uses the expression disease.


Disease, illness, malady? Semantics.
Fiona
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5691. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Travis, Language of the Heart

From: Glenn Chesnut . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 5:09:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Laurie,
It strikes me that the question of whether

alcoholism was or was not referred to as a

"disease" during the early AA period is a

lot more complicated than you are implying.


- - - -
See for example one of the best modern

sociological studies of Alcoholics Anonymous:


http://hindsfoot.org/kas1.html
Annette R. Smith, Ph.D., "The Social World of

Alcoholics Anonymous: How It Works," with an

introduction by Linda Farris Kurtz, DPA,

Hindsfoot Foundation Series on Treatment and

Recovery (New York: iUniverse, 2007), pp. 74-75.
Annette Smith notes that:
The word "disease" appears only three times

in the A.A. Big Book. It is mentioned first on

page 64 in discussing alcoholism, then again

at the beginning of the second part of the

book in the story of Bill Dotson, the Akron

lawyer who was Alcoholics Anonymous Number

Three. When Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob visited

Dotson in the hospital, they told him he had

"a disease," and when he explained his

conversion to his wife, he told her he felt

that God had cured him "of this terrible

disease." (AAWS, 1976:187-188, 191)


However, in spite of its avoidance of the

specific word "disease," alcoholism is referred

to over and over again throughout the book

as a "sickness," a "malady," and an "ailment,"

and alcoholics are characterized as persons who

are "sick" or "ill." In the Personal Stories

section of the third edition of the Big Book,

one of the subtitles is "How Forty-Three

Alcoholics Recovered From Their Malady." [NOTE 44]
Kurtz (2002:5) states that despite the fact

that "A.A. does not promote the disease concept

of alcoholism," most members refer to their

alcoholism as a disease. However, this can be

regarded more as a metaphor than as a literal

description in the sense in which the word

disease is usually employed in technical medical

terminology (Kurtz, 1979:199-202). Use of this

metaphor removes the stigma generally attached

to alcoholism in society, allowing A.A.

participants to see themselves as "sick"

rather than "bad" (Conrad and Schneider,

1980), and to assume the "sick role" (Parsons,

1952), so that recovery becomes possible. As

will be shown in this chapter, dealing with

and finally accepting this concept is crucial

in enabling newcomers to move through the four

progressive stages of becoming integrated into

A.A.'s social world.
NOTE 44. Sick, sick person, or sickness on

pages 18, 64, 67, 90, 92, 100, 101, 106, 107,

108, 115, 139, 140, 141, 147, 149, 153, 157,

and 164.
Ill or illness on pages 7, 18, 20, 30, 44, 92,

107, 108, 115, 118, 122, 139, 140, and 142.
The words ail or ailment are used on pages 135,

139, 140.


Malady appears on pages 23, 64, 92, 138, 139,

and 165. (AAWS, 1976)


AAWS. 1976. Alcoholics Anonymous. 3rd ed.

New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.

Orig. pub. 1939.
Kurtz, Ernest. 1979. Not-God: A History of

Alcoholics Anonymous. Center City, Minn:

Hazelden.
Kurtz, Ernest. 2002. "Alcoholics Anonymous

and the Disease Concept of Alcoholism."

Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly 20 (Nos. 3/4):

5-40.
Conrad, Peter and Joseph W. Schneider. 1980.

Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to

Sickness. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.


Parsons, Talcott and Renee Fox. 1952. "Illness,

Therapy and the Modern Urban American Family."

The Journal of Social Issues 8(4):31-34.
- - - -
It is impossible, I believe, to discuss the

issue of why alcoholism was regarded as a

disease in early AA without a detailed and

careful study of Sally Brown and David R.

Brown, A Biography of Mrs. Marty Mann.
We can start with p. xiii, a citation of

"Imagine Such a Disease" by the President of

the American Medical Society.
And then go on to p. 10, where the Brown's

describe the basic credo which Marty publicized

all over the United States:
"Alcoholism is a disease and the alcoholic

is a sick person.

The alcoholic can be helped and is worth

helping.


This is a public health problem and therefore

a public responsibility."


- - - -
Or let us note how the issue is discussed by

Bill Swegan, the principal spokesman for the

wing of early AA which stressed the psychological

side of AA rather than the spiritual side.


Sgt. Bill Swegan, On the Military Firing Line

in the Alcoholism Treatment Program, pp. 13-15


"Alcoholism is not a behavior problem,

but a very complex disease"


"In the past half century, more has been

accomplished to recognize, define, and

eliminate the stigma associated with alcoholism

than had been brought about in any previous era.

At the heart of this change has been the partial

removal of the old principle of defining

alcoholism by the behavior it produces, and

the progress that has been made in solving

many of the mysteries surrounding the disease.

It is an illness, and this is now recognized

by most health agencies, medical treatment

facilities, and therapists.


Some resistance to the disease concept still

remains however among law enforcement people,

who often still wish to regard it completely

as a behavior problem. And this is also usually

true among the members of the alcoholic's

family. We must not forget that parents,

brothers and sisters, spouses and children,

are the ones who are constantly exposed to

the negative consequences of the alcoholic

behavior. It is difficult indeed for families

to think of alcoholism as a disease, when they

are the ones who are most immediately subjected

to all of the financial and social pressures

caused by the alcoholic family member, and

they are the ones most likely to suffer

physically from the alcoholic's rages and

tantrums and automobile accidents ....
Because even the major components of behavior

differ widely from alcoholic to alcoholic, it

is easy for someone who is an alcoholic to

pretend to himself that he is not. I certainly

did that to myself when I was in my twenties:

convincing me that I was in fact an alcoholic

was a very difficult process, even though when

you read my story, this may seem preposterous.

How could I conceivably not have known, quite

early on, that I was an alcoholic? It was

because people would point at so-and-so, and

say that he was an alcoholic, and I seemed to

myself to be totally different from that person,

in numerous essential ways. Therefore --

I would try to convince myself -- if he is an

alcoholic, then I am not, because I am not

the same as him.
Since alcoholism produces guilt and destroys

the alcoholic's feelings of self-worth, this

produces even greater barriers to responding

in any kind of positive way. If I had to admit

that I had become an alcoholic, then I would

feel even guiltier than I already did back

when I was in my twenties (which was overwhelm-

ingly great), and my almost totally-demolished

sense of self-worth would have been even

further destroyed. So I fought any attempt

by others to try to convince me that I had

a problem with drinking.


We must continue working to educate people

about the true nature of alcoholism. It is

not a behavior problem, and the kind of guilt

I felt about my compulsive drinking was

inappropriate. I had to do something about

it, and I had to do it before I was totally

destroyed by it. But becoming ill is not a

matter for which one should feel guilt, nor

is contracting an illness something which

should shatter one's sense of self-worth. We

do not blame sick people in a civilized society,

but help them to get well again.


And if I myself fall prey to some treatable

disease, from which I could recover by taking

appropriate steps, the intelligent response

is not to feel that I have become worthless,

but to take those steps which I must take to

bring about my recovery."


- - - -
If you want to talk about what Jellinek

believed and said, you have to ask "Jellinek

when?" because he changed his position over

a period of time. But he is most often

remembered for his 1960 book which was

entitled "The Disease Concept of Alcoholism."


And Jellinek also means his AA disciples,

like Searcy Whaley in Dallas, Texas, to whom

Bill W. sent Ebby to see if Searcy could get

him sober.


- - - -
What I'm trying to say here is, that if you

want to discuss the question of whether or not

alcoholism is properly to be regarded as a

"disease" or an "illness" or a "malady" (or

as something else entirely), this is perfectly

all right. And we can talk about our own

theories about what is "good AA" and what is

"bad AA."


But once you start talking about "what the Big

Book says" and "what early AA people believed,"

you have to go back and actually read the early

documents, and accurately report what those

folks actually said on that subject.
Glenn C. (South Bend, Indiana)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5692. . . . . . . . . . . . the 24 Hour book and spirituality

vs. religion

From: trysh travis . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/9/2009 1:12:00 PM
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Responding to Art's comment about the impact that "the acceptance of the 24

Hour book would have had on the more mundane matter of Bill W's royalty

agreement," I agree that this was a consideration for the Conference, and I

think comparing the responses Bill (and the delegates, and the New York

office generally) had to *24 Hours* and to *The Little Red Book* is key.
From my reading of the correspondence, I'd say that in both cases, there

were concerns about whether the "spirituality" on offer in the books was

maybe a little too Christian for comfort, combined with anxieties about how

the books' popularity might cut into the revenue generated by Big Book sales

and necessary to keep the work of the GSO alive. Add to this the steady

stream of letters from people who wanted to publish their own guides to AA--

often 12-Step ideas mingled in with suggestions about diet, exercise, or the

power of positive thinking-- and you get an interlocking set of problems

that must've assumed nightmarish proportions.
What impresses me most about this history is the constant willingness to

search for a middle ground for consensus decision-making. "Live and let

live" is a lesson that a lot of big organizations today could benefit from

adopting as their motto!


Trysh T.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
++++Message 5693. . . . . . . . . . . . Early black AA members

From: azmikefitz . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/7/2009 10:53:00 PM


IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
--- In AAHistoryLovers@yahoogroups.com,

"hesofine2day"


Yüklə 11,49 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   74




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə