758
The Wealth of Nations
upon annuities for terms of thirty-two, of eighty-nine, of ninety-
eight, and of ninety-nine years. In 1719, the proprietors of the
annuities for thirty-two years were induced to accept, in lieu of
them, South-sea stock to the amount of eleven and a-half years
purchase of the annuities, together with an additional quantity of
stock, equal to the arrears which happened then to be due upon
them. In 1720, the greater part of the other annuities for terms of
years, both long and short, were subscribed into the same fund.
The long annuities, at that time, amounted to £666,821: 8:3½ a-
year. On the 5th of January 1775, the remainder of them, or what
was not subscribed at that time, amounted only to £136,453:12:8d.
During the two wars which began in 1739 and in 1755, little
money was borrowed, either upon annuities for terms of years, or
upon those for lives. An annuity for ninety-eight or ninety-nine
years, however, is worth nearly as much as a perpetuity, and should
therefore, one might think, be a fund for borrowing nearly as much.
But those who, in order to make family settlements, and to pro-
vide for remote futurity, buy into the public stocks, would not
care to purchase into one of which the value was continually di-
minishing; and such people make a very considerable proportion,
both of the proprietors and purchasers of stock. An annuity for a
long term of years, therefore, though its intrinsic value may be
very nearly the same with that of a perpetual annuity, will not find
nearly the same number of purchasers. The subscribers to a new
loan, who mean generally to sell their subscription as soon as pos-
sible, prefer greatly a perpetual annuity, redeemable by parliament,
to an irredeemable annuity, for a long term of years, of only equal
amount. The value of the former may be supposed always the
same, or very nearly the same; and it makes, therefore, a more
convenient transferable stock than the latter.
During the two last-mentioned wars, annuities, either for terms
of years or for lives, were seldom granted, but as premiums to the
subscribers of a new loan, over and above the redeemable annuity or
interest, upon the credit of which the loan was supposed to be made.
They were granted, not as the proper fund upon which the money
was borrowed, but as an additional encouragement to the lender.
Annuities for lives have occasionally been granted in two differ-
ent ways; either upon separate lives, or upon lots of lives, which,
in French, are called tontines, from the name of their inventor.
When annuities are granted upon separate lives, the death of ev-
ery individual annuitant disburdens the public revenue, so far as
it was affected by his annuity. When annuities are granted upon
tontines, the liberation of the public revenue does not commence
till the death of all the annuitants comprehended in one lot, which
may sometimes consist of twenty or thirty persons, of whom the
survivors succeed to the annuities of all those who die before them;
759
Adam Smith
the last survivor succeeding to the annuities of the whole lot. Upon
the same revenue, more money can always be raised by tontines
than by annuities for separate lives. An annuity, with a right of
survivorship, is really worth more than an equal annuity for a
separate life; and, from the confidence which every man naturally
has in his own good fortune, the principle upon which is founded
the success of all lotteries, such an annuity generally sells for some-
thing more than it is worth. In countries where it is usual for
government to raise money by granting annuities, tontines are,
upon this account, generally preferred to annuities for separate
lives. The expedient which will raise most money, is almost always
preferred to that which is likely to bring about, in the speediest
manner, the liberation of the public revenue.
In France, a much greater proportion of the public debts con-
sists in annuities for lives than in England. According to a memoir
presented by the parliament of Bourdeaux to the king, in 1764,
the whole public debt of France is estimated at twenty-four hun-
dred millions of livres; of which the capital, for which annuities
for lives had been granted, is supposed to amount to three hun-
dred millions, the eighth part of the whole public debt. The annu-
ities themselves are computed to amount to thirty millions a-year,
the fourth part of one hundred and twenty millions, the supposed
interest of that whole debt. These estimations, I know very well,
are not exact; but having been presented by so very respectable a
body as approximations to the truth, they may, I apprehend, be
considered as such. It is not the different degrees of anxiety in the
two governments of France and England for the liberation of the
public revenue, which occasions this difference in their respective
modes of borrowing; it arises altogether from the different views
and interests of the lenders.
In England, the seat of government being in the greatest mer-
cantile city in the world, the merchants are generally the people
who advance money to government. By advancing it, they do not
mean to diminish, but, on the contrary, to increase their mercan-
tile capitals; and unless they expected to sell, with some profit,
their share in the subscription for a new loan, they never would
subscribe. But if, by advancing their money, they were to pur-
chase, instead of perpetual annuities, annuities for lives only,
whether their own or those of other people, they would not al-
ways be so likely to sell them with a profit. Annuities upon their
own lives they would always sell with loss; because no man will
give for an annuity upon the life of another, whose age and state
of health are nearly the same with his own, the same price which
he would give for one upon his own. An annuity upon the life of
a third person, indeed, is, no doubt, of equal value to the buyer
and the seller; but its real value begins to diminish from the mo-