129
Adam Smith
grass are much superior to what can be made by corn.
Thus, in the neighbourhood of a great town, the demand for
milk, and for forage to horses, frequently contribute, together with
the high price of butcher’s meat, to raise the value of grass above
what may be called its natural proportion to that of corn. This
local advantage, it is evident, cannot be communicated to the lands
at a distance.
Particular circumstances have sometimes rendered some coun-
tries so populous, that the whole territory, like the lands in the
neighbourhood of a great town, has not been sufficient to pro-
duce both the grass and the corn necessary for the subsistence of
their inhabitants. Their lands, therefore, have been principally
employed in the production of grass, the more bulky commodity,
and which cannot be so easily brought from a great distance; and
corn, the food of the great body of the people, has been chiefly
imported from foreign countries. Holland is at present in this situ-
ation; and a considerable part of ancient Italy seems to have been
so during the prosperity of the Romans. To feed well, old Cato
said, as we are told by Cicero, was the first and most profitable
thing in the management of a private estate; to feed tolerably well,
the second; and to feed ill, the third. To plough, he ranked only in
the fourth place of profit and advantage. Tillage, indeed, in that
part of ancient Italy which lay in the neighbour hood of Rome,
must have been very much discouraged by the distributions of
corn which were frequently made to the people, either gratuitously,
or at a very low price. This corn was brought from the conquered
provinces, of which several, instead of taxes, were obliged to fur-
nish a tenth part of their produce at a stated price, about sixpence
a-peck, to the republic. The low price at which this corn was dis-
tributed to the people, must necessarily have sunk the price of
what could be brought to the Roman market from Latium, or the
ancient territory of Rome, and must have discouraged its cultiva-
tion in that country.
In an open country, too, of which the principal produce is corn,
a well-inclosed piece of grass will frequently rent higher than any
corn field in its neighbourhood. It is convenient for the mainte-
nance of the cattle employed in the cultivation of the corn; and its
high rent is, in this case, not so properly paid from the value of its
own produce, as from that of the corn lands which are cultivated
by means of it. It is likely to fall, if ever the neighbouring lands are
completely inclosed. The present high rent of inclosed land in
Scotland seems owing to the scarcity of inclosure, and will prob-
ably last no longer than that scarcity. The advantage of inclosure is
greater for pasture than for corn. It saves the labour of guarding
the cattle, which feed better, too, when they are not liable to be
disturbed by their keeper or his dog.
130
The Wealth of Nations
But where there is no local advantage of this kind, the rent and
profit of corn, or whatever else is the common vegetable food of
the people, must naturally regulate upon the land which is fit for
producing it, the rent and profit of pasture.
The use of the artificial grasses, of turnips, carrots, cabbages,
and the other expedients which have been fallen upon to make an
equal quantity of land feed a greater number of cattle than when
in natural grass, should somewhat reduce, it might be expected,
the superiority which, in an improved country, the price of butcher’s
meat naturally has over that of bread. It seems accordingly to have
done so; and there is some reason for believing that, at least in the
London market, the price of butcher’s meat, in proportion to the
price of bread, is a good deal lower in the present times than it was
in the beginning of the last century.
In the Appendix to the life of Prince Henry, Doctor Birch has
given us an account of the prices of butcher’s meat as commonly
paid by that prince. It is there said, that the four quarters of an ox,
weighing six hundred pounds, usually cost him nine pounds ten
shillings, or thereabouts; that is thirty-one shillings and eight-pence
per hundred pounds weight. Prince Henry died on the 6th of
November 1612, in the nineteenth year of his age.
In March 1764, there was a parliamentary inquiry into the causes
of the high price of provisions at that time. It was then, among
other proof to the same purpose, given in evidence by a Virginia
merchant, that in March 1763, he had victualled his ships for
twentyfour or twenty-five shillings the hundred weight of beef,
which he considered as the ordinary price; whereas, in that dear
year, he had paid twenty-seven shillings for the same weight and
sort. This high price in 1764 is, however, four shillings and eight-
pence cheaper than the ordinary price paid by Prince Henry; and
it is the best beef only, it must be observed, which is fit to be salted
for those distant voyages.
The price paid by Prince Henry amounts to 3d. 4/5ths per pound
weight of the whole carcase, coarse and choice pieces taken to-
gether; and at that rate the choice pieces could not have been sold
by retail for less than 4½d. or 5d. the pound.
In the parliamentary inquiry in 1764, the witnesses stated the
price of the choice pieces of the best beef to be to the consumer
4d. and 4½d. the pound; and the coarse pieces in general to be
from seven farthings to 2½d. and 2¾d.; and this, they said, was in
general one halfpenny dearer than the same sort of pieces had
usually been sold in the month of March. But even this high price
is still a good deal cheaper than what we can well suppose the
ordinary retail price to have been in the time of Prince Henry.
During the first twelve years of the last century, the average price
of the best wheat at the Windsor market was £ 1:18:3½d. the