Bilig 49. sayı



Yüklə 3,45 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə74/90
tarix18.06.2018
ölçüsü3,45 Kb.
#49338
1   ...   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   ...   90

Tayfun, Is There a Relationship Between Grade Average Point and Students 
 
197 
Table 4: Correlation Between Average Grade and Factors 
 
Average 
Grade 
REGR 
factor 
score 1 
REGR 
factor 
score 2 
REGR 
factor 
score 3 
REGR 
factor 
score 4 
REGR 
factor 
score 5 
REGR 
factor 
score 6 
REGR 
factor 
score 7 
REGR 
factor 
score 8 
REGR 
factor 
score 9 
Average  
 
Grade 
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 


344 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 1  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
-,014 
,811 
278 
 


384 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 2  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
-,102 
,089 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 3  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

,093 
,120 
278 
,000 
1,000 
384 
,000 
1,000 
384 


384 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 4  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
,034 
,578 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 5  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
-,088 
,142 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 6  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
-,073 
,226 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 7  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
,037 
,543 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 8  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
,084 
,162 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
 
REGR 
factor 
score 9  
Pearson 
Correlation 
Sig. (2-tailed) 

 
,028 
,637 
278 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 
,000 
1,000 
384 
 


384 
The cheating perceptions of cheated and not cheated students were examined by 
using “t” test. According to the table 5 and 6, there is a significant relationship 
between factors 1, 3, 4 and whether they cheated or not at the level of the 5% 
significance (p<0,05). Students’ cheating perception differs in terms of factor 1. 
Student who cheated before agree more strongly on variables of factor 1 than not 
cheated students. The result is reasonable, for all of the variables indicate possible 
behavior of a cheated. It was expected that cheated must agree on them. Also, 
cheated students disagree with not cheated students on factors 3 and 4. Cheated 
students don’t see cheating behavior as an offence, debility and unethical behavior 


biligSpring / 2009,  number  49 
 
198 
contrary to not cheated students. Further, they have different opinions to prevent 
cheating, for example; they are strongly opposed to punishing cheating, 
administering exams in less crowd classrooms and with more supervisors. 
Table 5: Group Statistics 
 
I cheated in 
some case 
N Mean  Std. 
Deviation 
Std. Error 
Mean 
REGR factor 
score 1  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
,23 
-,20 
1,05 
,90 
,079 
,064 
REGR factor 
score 2  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,00 
-,015 
1,02 
,98 
,076 
,070 
REGR factor 
score 3  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,12 
,10 
,96 
1,02 
,072 
,072 
REGR factor 
score 4  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,11 
,09 
,96 
1,03 
,072 
,073 
REGR factor 
score 5  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
,03 
-,03 
,96 
1,03 
,072 
,072 
REGR factor 
score 6  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,09 
,08 
1,05 
,94 
,079 
,066 
REGR factor 
score 7  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,04 
,04 
1,01 
,98 
,076 
,069 
REGR factor 
score 8  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
,06 
-,05 
,96 
1,02 
,072 
,072 
REGR factor 
score 9  
Yes 
No 
177 
200 
-,04 
,06 
,99 
,99 
,074 
,070 
There is no significant relationship between factors 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 
whether cheated or not at the 5% level of significance (p>0,05). These 
results show that cheated and not cheated have the same cheating 
perception about the lesson based reasons for cheating, the attitudes of the 
management of the school and academic staff against cheating, the opinions 
about the cheated student, the student-based reasons that cause cheating, 
the management and supervisor-based reasons that cause cheating and the 
role of the questions format to prevent cheating. The factors and their 
explained variables were exhibited below. 
Table 6: Independent Samples Test 
t-test for Equality of Means 
 
t df 
Sig. 
(2-tailed) 
REGR factor score 1  
4,352 375 
,000 
REGR factor score 2  
,142 375 
,887 
REGR factor score 3  
-2,208 375 
,028 
REGR factor score 4  
-2,102 375 
,036 
REGR factor score 5  
,653 
375 
,514 
REGR factor score 6  
-1,777 375 
,076 
REGR factor score 7  
-,912 
375 
,362 
REGR factor score 8  
1,230 
375 
,219 
REGR factor score 9  
-1,031 
375 
,303 
Group Statistics 


Yüklə 3,45 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   ...   90




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə