Energia s. P. Korolev Rocket and Space Corporation Energia

Appendix 13 / Information about continuing court proceedings in which the Corporation acts as a plaintiff/defendant on debt claim, with indicated total amount of made/lodged claims that may have an impact on Corporation activities.

1. Trial concerning the recovery of money in the amount of 1,736,783.21 rubles.

Plaintiff is OOO Domzhilservis (Room III, 7 Isaeva Street, Moscow Region, Korolev, 1141075)

Defendant is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Matter in contest is recovery of money in the amount of 1,736,783.21 rubles under the contract to manage an apartment house.

By the judgment of the Moscow Region Arbitration Court of 14.04.2015, the claims were satisfied in full scope.

2. Trial concerning the matter of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the organization.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070) and other legal and natural persons

Defendant is SUE NPTs SPURT (4 Zapadny 1^st proyezd, Zelenograd, Moskow, 124460)

Matter in contest is the creditor’s claim for recovery of 55 360 000 rubles 00 kopeks within the framework of the matter of insolvency (bankruptcy) of the organization.

As of 31.12.2014, an action for insolvency (bankruptcy) of the organization was brought against SUE NPTs SPURT. The Corporation claims are entered into the schedule of creditors, bankruptcy proceedings are prolonged till 16.06.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

3. Lawsuit to invalidate a resolution by the administration of Sergiev-Posad municipal district.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Defendant is the administration of Sergiev-Posad municipal district of the Moscow Region (169, Red Army Avenue, Sergiev Posad, 141310).

Matter in contest is invalidation of the defendant’s actions to set the repurchase value of a land plot.

By the judgment of the Moscow Region Arbitration Court of 06.11.2014, the claims were satisfied in full scope. The ruling of the court of appeal of 10.02.2015 upheld the decision of the court of the first instance.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

4. Lawsuit to reduce the repurchase value of a land plot.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Defendant is the administration of Sergiev-Posad municipal district of the Moscow Region (169, Red Army Avenue, Sergiev Posad, 141310).

Matter in contest is invalidation of the defendant’s actions to set the repurchase value of a land plot.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for 05.03.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

5. Lawsuit to collect debt owed for work completed under a contract.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Defendant is FSUE Khrunichev State Research and Production Center (18, Novozavodskaya St., Moscow, 121087).

Matter in contest is to collect debt owed for work completed under a contract in the amount of 7,390,500 rubles 00 kopeks.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for 19.02.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

6. Lawsuit to collect debt owed for work completed under a contract.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Defendant is FSUE Khrunichev State Research and Production Center (18, Novozavodskaya St., Moscow, 121087).

Matter in contest is to collect debt owed for work completed under a contract in the amount of 2,801,000 rubles 00 kopeks.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for 18.02.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

7. Lawsuit to recover the actual costs of work completed under a government contract.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Defendant is the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense (19 Znamenka Street, Moscow, 119160).

Matter in contest is to collect a debt owed to cover actual expenses in the amount of 104,040,957 rubles 17 kopeks.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for 26.02.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

8. Lawsuit to recover penalty for failure to complete work under a government contract on schedule.

Plaintiff is the Russian Federation Ministry of Defense (19 Znamenka Street, Moscow, 119160).

Defendant is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Matter in contest is to recover penalty in the amount of 110,259,600 rubles 00 kopeks.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for 23.03.2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

9. Lawsuit to collect debt owed under a contract.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Plaintiff is OOO PKF Mars-Merkuryi (Office 29, 21 Nedelina Street, Shchelkovo-7, Moscow Region, 141107)

Matter in contest is to collect a debt owed under a contract in the amount of 229,319.53 rubles, late payment charge in the amount of 97,231.48 rubles.

As of December 31, 2014, the case was under consideration at court of primary jurisdiction.

By the judgment of the court of primary jurisdiction as of Feb 2, 2015, the claims were satisfied in full scope.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is low.

10. Trial concerning the recovery of money in the tentative amount of 112,000,000 USD (the venue of the proceedings is Sweden).

Plaintiffs are companies belonging to the Boeing and Aker groups.

Defendant is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Matter in contest is the action brought against RSC Energia for a total (tentative) sum of 112,000,000 USD. On October 11, 2010 the arbitrator passed the decision on termination of the trial for procedural reasons (due to the fact that the case is not within his jurisdiction) and reimbursement of the RSC Energia’s expenses on the trial. On January 11, 2011 the Boeing and Aker Group of Companies submitted notice of appeal to the court of Stockholm city with respect to the Arbitrator’s Award. On April 11, 2014 the court of appeal ruled to dismiss the claims by Boeing and Aker (Kvarner). On May 9, 2014 Boeing and Aker (Kvaerner) filed a complaint against the ruling of the court of appeal with the Supreme Court of Sweden. In the 4th quarter of 2014 Aker (Kvaerner) withdrew its claim, insofar as the Aker’s (Kvaerner’s) claim is concerned the case is dismissed.

As of December 31, 2014, the litigation proceedings still go on insofar as Boeing’s claim is concerned. The predicted outcome of this trial by court is favorable.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is high.

11. Lawsuit for breach of Agreement on Creation of Sea Launch Companies and Guarantees and Security Agreement. Amount of the claim is 222,000,000 USD (the venue of the proceedings is USA).

Plaintiffs are the Boeing Company and the Boeing Commercial Space Company (BCSC) (the claim was filed on February 1, 2013, in June 2013 Kvaerner (Aker) company joined the plaintiffs.

Plaintiff is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070) and other legal persons.

Matter in contest is a breach of «The Agreement on Creation of Sea Launch Companies» dated May 3, 1995 and recovery of money in the amount of 92,000,000 USD, as well as a breach of «The Guarantees and Security Agreement» dated February 3, 1996 and recovery of money in the amount of 130,000,000 USD.

On July 5, 2013 RSC Energia raised appropriate objections as well as the counter-claim for the amount of 430,000,000 USD.

In the 4th quarter of 2014 Aker (Kvaerner) withdrew its claim, insofar as the Aker’s (Kvaerner’s) claim is concerned the case is dismissed.

As of December 31, 2014, the litigation proceedings still go on insofar as Boeing’s claim is concerned. By preliminary estimates, the trial is expected to continue at least till mid-2015.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is high.

12. Lawsuit to recover penalty for failure to meet milestone dates under a government contract. The claim amount is 2,072,354,749.80 rubles.

Plaintiff is Roskosmos (42 Shchepkina St., Moscow, 107996).

Defendant is RSC Energia (4А Lenin Street, Moscow Region, Korolev city, 141070).

Matter in contest is to recover penalty in the amount of 2,072,354,749.80 rubles 00 kopeks.

The case is pending in the court of the first instance. A session of the court is scheduled for April 6, 2015.

Forecast is uncertain.

The level of possible impact on the Corporate activities is high.

1 Information being confidential is not provided in the annual report.

2 Stated in the Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 168

3 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 172

4 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 180

5 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 186

6 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 217

7 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 218

8 Stated in Code of Corporate Governance, Part B, p. 279

9 In the column «Size of transaction » the signs «-» и «+» in front of the amount mean that when concluding additional agreement to the Contract the Contract price accordingly decreased or increased by stated amount (in connection with change of the works’ volume).
Zeros in the column «Size of transaction » mean that the concluded additional agreement had no concern with the Contract price (postponement of the dates for contract performance milestones, changes in the text, etc.)
The amount without sign in the column «Size of transaction » means that the Contract amount didn’t change (tentative price conversion into fixed price without change, etc.).

10 In the column «Size of transaction » the signs «-» и «+» in front of the amount mean that when concluding additional agreement to the Contract, the Contract price accordingly decreased or increased by stated amount (in connection with change of the works’ volume).
Zeros in the column «Size of transaction » mean that the concluded additional agreement had no concern with the Contract price (postponement of the dates for contract performance milestones, changes in the text, etc.)
The amount without sign in the column «Size of transaction » means that the Contract amount didn’t change (tentative price conversion into fixed price without change, etc.).