16
Young’s study of monuments to the Holocaust has proved helpful.
His discussion of
‘anti-monuments’ seeks to elaborate alternative ways in which remembrance can be
activated and sustained. His analysis suggests to me that traces of memory, or indeed
trauma, do not always accumulate in the most obvious of places.
24
Iversen’s collection of
essays,
Beyond Pleasure (2007) deeply influenced my engagement with the medium of
photography. Two essays in particular have long stayed with me: a chapter which used
texts by Freud and Lacan to articulate the interweaving of indexicality and trauma in the
photograph, formative to the
development of this thesis; and a discussion of Maya Lin’s
Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington. Iversen suggested that this structure did not
function as a typical monument, disavowing loss in the form of a fetish, but rather
encouraged an active engagement with the past through the “shadowy revenants”
projected by the bodies of visitors on to its smooth dark surface.
25
Pollock offers a
feminist contribution to trauma studies, which is an approach that I do not prioritise here,
but in
After-affects, after images (2013), Pollock raises interesting questions as to how
artists process traces of personal and historical traumas, and how viewers arriving at an
artwork may encounter these traces and seek to transform them.
26
Marianne Hirsch’s
articulation of intergenerational trauma, interweaving theory, criticism and
autobiography, has been particularly useful for analysing the photographs made by a
second generation of Polish artists after the war. It has also emboldened me to
acknowledge my personal connection
to the topic of this thesis, to acknowledge the
traumas I have inherited through my own family history and to understand how this
history has influenced choices I have made in selecting work for this thesis. Collectively,
the above mentioned literature have inspired me to recognise and articulate the traces of
trauma in post-war Polish art photography. I also draw on the semiotic theories of Charles
Sanders Peirce in my discussion of photographic indexicality.
27
Where relevant I also
Spitzer (Hanover: University Press of New England, 1999), 8; Marianne Hirsch, “Surviving Images:
Holocaust Photographs and the Work of Postmemory,”
The Yale Journal of Criticism 14, no. 1 (Spring
2001), 5-37.
24
James E. Young, "Between History and Memory:
The Voice of the Eyewitness," in
Witness and Memory:
The Discourse of Trauma, eds. Ana Douglass and Thomas A. Vogler (New York: Routledge, 2003), 275-
283.
25
Margaret Iversen,
Beyond Pleasure: Barthes, Freud and Lacan (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press,
2007), 132.
26
Griselda Pollock,
After-affects, after images: Trauma and aesthetic transformation in the virtual feminist
museum (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013).
27
See Charles S. Peirce,
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2, eds., Charles Hartshorne and
Paul Weiss (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958); Charles S. Peirce,
Writings of Charles S. Peirce,
A Chronological Edition, vol. 2, eds., Peirce Edition Project (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1982).
17
draw on disciplines outside of art history, taking inspiration from literature, poetry and
film theory to supplement my discussion.
Much of what I write in the following chapters is directly related
to the traumatic events
of the Second World War. Yet the actual events of those years barely feature in my
analysis, as my concern is rather the imprints those events have left on the minds of those
who survived the war and the generations that followed. The events of 1939 to 1945 were
not the only traumas to have cast their shadow on the Polish psyche. In my analysis, I
suggest that multiple traumas can be discerned, overlapping and accumulating, in the
decades that followed. Events in the present can trigger and reactivate earlier traumatic
traces
imprinted on the mind, with the original trauma experienced retroactively. The
renegotiation of Polish borders at the 1945 Yalta conference reactivated historical
traumas surrounding Poland’s long contested statehood and difficulties faced in guarding
its geographical territory.
28
The wounds inflicted at Yalta were slow to heal in other
ways. At the conference, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin sanctioned the formation of a
Provisional Government of National Unity in Poland, which allowed for the inclusion of
communists and all but ensured Soviet colonisation of a newly re-established Poland. The
years that followed were characterised by ongoing manifestations
of violence and
oppression, a “long duress of trauma.”
29
Rather than single, unexpected, catastrophic
event, Polish citizens under Soviet rule endured a long period of chronic suffering.
Kantor described these years as an “inhuman epoch;” the horrors of war followed by “a
half century when power was exercised with utter primitivism by people bearing the
untouchable title of 'First Secretary', while the whole civilised world looked on with
absolute indifference.”
30
For this reason, I have not limited my investigation to the immediate post war years but
have extended my timeframe to trace the reverberations felt in subsequent decades in
order to understand how latent psychic wounds may be re-opened by events at a later
date. This thesis looks at a twenty-five year period, beginning with
the newly constituted
country under the leadership of Bolesław Bierut and ending with the dismissal of
28
Norman Davies talks about ‘Poland’ as an abstract idea; “It existed in men’s minds, even if it could not
always be observed on the ground or in the material world.” Norman Davies,
God’s Playground: A History
of Poland, Volume II 1795 to the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 8.
29
Milija Gluhovic,
Performing European Memories: Trauma, Ethics, Politics (London: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2013), 19.
30
Krzysztof Pleśniarowicz,
The Dead Memory Machine: Tadeusz Kantor’s Theatre of Death (Kraków:
Cricoteka, 1994a), 12.