9
INTRODUCTION:
EXPOSING WOUNDS
From the dim recesses,
as if from the abyss of Hell,
there started to emerge
people who had died long time ago
and memories of events
that, as in a dream,
had no explanation,
no beginning, no end,
no cause or effect.
They would emerge
and keep returning stubbornly,
as if waiting for my permission to let them enter.
I gave them my consent.
I understood their nature.
I understood where they were coming from.
The i m p r i n t s
impressed deeply
in the memorial past.
(Tadeusz Kantor, Excerpt from ‘Imprints,’
Silent Night (Cricotage), 1990)
1
The etymology of
trauma derives from the Greek τραῦμα, meaning ‘wound’.
Trauma is
still used in medical contexts to denote physical damage to the body. It has also come to
be used to denote psychological damage; a wound inflicted upon the mind. In his
influential writings on trauma, Sigmund Freud suggested that a wound of the mind does
not heal in the same way as a wound of the body.
2
It is also more difficult to recognise
and to comprehend. In fact, one of the salient features of trauma is its
1
Tadeusz Kantor,
A Journey Through Other Spaces: Essays and Manifestos, 1944-1990, ed. and trans.
Michal Kobialka (Berkeley:
California University Press, 1993), 182.
2
See Sigmund Freud, ‘From The History of an Infantile Neurosis’
(1918[1914]) in
The Standard Edition of
the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 17, ed. and trans. James Strachey (London:
Vintage, 2001);
Sigmund Freud,
Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) (New York: Bantam Books, 1967).
10
incomprehensibility. Freud suggested that there occur exceptions to ordinary experience,
such as accidents or life threatening events, which the subject is unprepared for and which
produce stimuli powerful enough to rupture the mind’s “protective shield.”
3
Building on
Freud’s insight, Cathy Caruth has described how a traumatic event is akin to a “breach in
the mind’s experience of time, self and world,” by which the wounding event is
“experienced too soon,
too unexpectedly, to be fully known and is therefore not available
to consciousness.”
4
Accounts from the liberation of Nazi German concentration camps in
1945 support this theory, and demonstrate a breakdown of both vision and language when
confronted with the horrors of the camps. In April 1945 the British Army’s Film and
Photographic Unit (AFPU) entered the camp at Bergen-Belsen and more than two
hundred photographs were taken. One AFPU photographer, Sergeant Oakes, recalled his
incomprehension at the scenes he saw: “...we couldn’t understand it. We had seen
corpses, we had seen our own casualties, but these bloodless bodies ...”
5
In
her recent
study of photographs taken at the liberation of the concentration camps, Barbie Zelizer
documents how the first journalists at the camps struggled with the inadequacies of
language to describe what they saw; she notes that “‘Words fail me’, was their repeated
refrain.”
6
While a traumatic event may be experienced bodily, it remains unassimilated by the
conscious mind. Instead, an invisible ‘wound’ is inflicted on the subconscious psychic
material, imprinting an invisible, inaccessible and indelible trace that lies dormant in the
subconscious. Freud stated, “Even things that seem completely forgotten
are present
somehow and somewhere, and have merely been buried and inaccessible to the subject.”
7
The excerpt from Polish artist Tadeusz Kantor’s poem that begins this chapter articulates
the way in which events can be retained or stored in the mind as “i m p r i n t s /
impressed deeply / in the memorial past.” Kantor also recognised a particular feature of
these impressions, namely that at a later date they re-emerge and “stubbornly” return with
3
Freud,
Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Chapter IV. Freud posited two different models of traumatic
experience: childhood trauma relating to castration anxiety that forms part of psycho-sexual development;
and the model of traumatic neurosis associated with war and severe accidents. My interest lies in the latter,
although pscyho-sexual traumas will be touched upon in the second chapter.
4
Cathy Caruth,
Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1996), 4.
5
Sergeant Harry Oakes, AFPU, Imperial War Museum Sound Archive interview, accession no. 19888/4
reel 2.
6
Barbie Zelizer,
Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory Through The Camera's Eye (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press 1998), 85.
7
Sigmund Freud, “Constructions in Analysis” (1937),
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological
Works of Sigmund Freud, vol 23, ed. and trans., James Strachey (London: Vintage, 2001), 260.
11
“no explanation.”
8
Freud used the term
nachträglichkeit, often translated as ‘deferred
action’, to describe this peculiar temporal structure in which the original trauma is
experienced retrospectively. A trigger in the present activates the imprinted trace and
returns the trauma to the conscious mind. It is only at this
later date that the original
traumatic event reveals itself, at a time and distance removed from the laying down of its
impression.
9
Caruth summarised the paradox at the heart of traumatic experience, namely,
“that the most direct seeing of a violent event may occur as an absolute inability to know
it; that immediacy, paradoxically, may take the form of belatedness.”
10
In 2003 Polish filmmaker Andrzej Wajda reflected upon the 1957 release of his film
Kanał [Canal], which recounted the tragic heroism of the Polish Home Army during the
1944 Warsaw Uprising. Wajda suggested that making the film was for him, and by
implication
his generation, a necessity. He simply stated, “we had to expose our
wounds.”
11
Wajda’s film focused on a particular moment in Polish history, when Polish
resistance fighters had attempted to liberate Warsaw from German occupation, timed to
coincide with the arrival of the Soviet Union’s Red Army. When the Soviet Army
presence did not materialise, the Germans waged an arduous campaign which killed more
than two hundred thousand people and demolished the majority of the city of Warsaw.
Kanał tells the story of a company of Home Army fighters
who escaped the German
onslaught through the city’s sewers. These physical and psychic wounds of Polish history
become the repeated subject of Wajda’s films. Importantly, Wajda was only able to
communicate these traumas retrospectively, after a delay;
Kanał was released more than a
decade after the events of 1944 and the time lag suggests the temporal distance needed for
his generation to comprehend the events of the Second World War.
Kanał was also the first film to be made in Poland about the Warsaw Uprising. The delay
therefore speaks to another trauma in this period of Polish history, namely the rewriting
of that history in the post-war years, which the art historian
David Crowley has described
as the “the myopic and crooked practice of History” in Poland under Soviet rule.
12
Events
which were unpalatable to the Soviet censors, or which pejoratively implicated the Soviet
8
Kantor,
A Journey Through Other Spaces, 182.
9
See Freud, ‘From The History of an Infantile Neurosis.’
10
Caruth,
Unclaimed Experience, 91-2.
11
Andrzej Wajda, preface to John Orr and Elzbieta Ostrowski,
The cinema of Andrzej Wajda: the art of
irony and defiance, (London: Wallflower Press, 2003), xii.
12
David Crowley,
Warsaw (London: Reaktion, 2003), 18.