Fact Sheet 3 - Albania - 8294-00/2012
6.
Assessment of outcome level
Explanation
Sources
6.1
What are the planned outcomes of the intervention?
The purpose of the project is to improve awareness and knowledge of the National Water Supply and Sewerage Services Sector Strategy, and to
enhance policy dialogue on national and regional level to the benefit of the water and sewerage sector.
(vii) p. 13
6.2
Did the intervention achieve its planned outcomes?
The strategy was widely distributed, so everybody quotes it and refers to it; donors base their projects on it, the government offices use it.
(ix)
6.3
Were the outcomes formulated in a realistic and
achievable manner?
Yes
6.4
Were there unexpected positive or negative outcomes of
the intervention?
It had a much greater resonance than we anticipated
(ix)
6.5
On which assumptions were the outcomes based?
Commitment from the Ministry of Public Works and Transport to fund the formal mailed distribution.
(vii) p. 20
6.6
Which risks for the achievement of outcomes were
formulated?
Given the wide experience of the Association with different events and conferences, we see little risk in undertaking the proposed project, with
the time factor as the basis of this risk.
(vii) p. 17
6.7
Is the intervention exemplary/ a model for other
interventions, does it form structures and can it be up‐
scaled?
(vii, p. 18) The Association guarantees the running costs by the membership fee from its member.
(ix, own) Many good strategies, studies or other important documents are not known because they are not “marketed” – therefore this approach
of publicizing it widely can be exemplary.
(vii), (ix), own
7.
Assessment of the impact in general
Explanation
Sources
7.1
Which is the most important positive impact of the
intervention?
That the strategy is used and we found it in every office we went for interviews.
7.2
Which is the most important negative impact of the
intervention?
8.
Assessment of the impact in relation to the key
environmental criteria
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
8.1
How, and to what extent, did the intervention (positively
and negatively) plausibly contribute to changes in the
key criteria ʺenvironmental protectionʺ, and which
external factors contributed to these changes?
8.2
How, and to what extent, did the intervention (positively
and negatively) plausibly contribute to changes in the
key criteria for “sustainable management of natural
resources”, and which external factors contributed to
these changes?
8.3
… ʺreduce conflicts about the use of resourcesʺ
8.4
… ʺimprovement of standard of livingʺ
8.5
… ʺimproved access to energy and resourcesʺ
8.6
… ʺcontribution to climate change adaptation and
mitigationʺ
8.7
… ʺstrengthening of governmental institutions and civil
societyʺ
8.8
… ʺimproved possibility to implement multilateral
environmental agreementsʺ
8.9
… ʺothersʺ
Page 9
Fact Sheet 3 - Albania - 8294-00/2012
9.
Assessment of the impact in relation to the thematic
operational fields for environment and development
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
9.1
Sustainable natural resource management and
preserving biodiversity
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
9.2
Sustainable chemicals and waste management
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
9.3
Climate protection
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
9.4
Water and sanitation
Explanation
Assessme‐
nt 1‐7[1]
Sources
9.4.1
How and to what extent did the intervention (positively
and negatively) plausibly contribute to changes
regarding the sector objective ʺimprovement of basic
services and healthʺ? Which external factors contributed
to these changes?
The project has been 100% successful in achieving its overall goal to ʺContribute to the implementation of National Water Supply and Sewerage
Services Sector Strategy in Albania issued by the Albanian Government, by disseminating the document and orienting water utilities towards
principles of cost control and full cost recovery as well as by Investing in enhancing the capacities of work force.ʺ
4 (vii) p. 14
9.4.2
… ʺsecuring livelihood and economic developmentʺ
9.4.3
… ʺprotection of water resourcesʺ
9.4.4
… ʺstructured and equitable management of water
resourcesʺ
9.4.5
… ʺminimization of risksʺ
9.4.6
… ʺintegrated consideration of cross‐cutting issues
(environment, gender equality, good governance and
conflict prevention)ʺ
9.4.7
… ʺadditional factors (competence for O&M, adequate
legal framework, ownership by stakeholders,
participatory sector dialogue, awareness)ʺ
9.4.8
… ʺʺrisks and potentialsʺ
10.
Assessment of the impact on the beneficiaries and the
institutions
Explanation
Sources
10.1
How, and to what extent, did the intervention (positively
and negatively) plausibly contribute to change the
beneficiariesʹ lives?
(viii, p. 4) The broad distribution of the Strategy, both at planned stakeholder meetings, such as the annual conference of the Water Supply and
Sewerage Association, and through a direct mailing to named, responsible local public officials, has been a significant first step in improving the
quality and content of the dialogue on access to service, service coverage and service reliability improvement.
(ix) Donors refer their programmes to it.
(viii), (ix)
10.2
How, and to what extent, did the intervention contribute
to the beneficiaries’ change in attitude and behaviour?
10.3
What were the contributions of the beneficiaries to the
main observed changes?
Page 10
Dostları ilə paylaş: |