Scriptures and other religious books. In response, Commia ripped and damaged the Scriptures
and then told Navdeep words to the effect of “shut the f*ck up and let me do what I must.”
56.
Navdeep spent two and a half days at Ulster, and was then transferred to Fishkill.
On April 18, 2005, the day Navdeep was transferred from Ulster to Fishkill, Navdeep’s personal
belongings were packed in two property bags, one of which contained his religious books. When
Navdeep explained to John Doe #2, a correctional officer at Ulster, that the property bag
contained his religious books and asked that he treat it with respect, John Doe #2 threw the bag
on the floor and intentionally and repeatedly kicked the bag.
C.
Incarceration at Fishkill
57.
On April 18, 2005, shortly after his arrival at Fishkill, Navdeep wrote to the
Grievance office and D.S.S. K. Barto informing them that (a) he needed his Kara at all times; (b)
he needed to perform his morning prayers between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.; and (c)
according to the Sikh code of conduct, the Scriptures were required to be covered, stored in a
clean place and kept in an elevated location. On April 25, 2005, Captain Pelc responded to the
letter to D.S.S. K. Barto, that Navdeep: (a) would only be allowed to possess his Kara during
meals, but that DOCS was reviewing whether it was necessary for Navdeep to possess the Kara
at all times; (b) that he could pray at any time, as long as it did not interfere with facility counts
or programming; and (c) that he could cover the Scriptures with a clean cloth and place them on
top of his locker.
1.
April 23, 2005 Misbehavior Report
58.
On April 23, 2005, Correctional Officer Graziano instructed Navdeep to report to
the main building porter pool for work detail. At the time of Graziano’s request, Navdeep had
just begun his prayers, but after finishing them, he explained to Graziano that he would not
comply with the order until he was granted his Kara. Correctional Officer Graziano placed
13
Navdeep in keeplock. Upon information and belief, Lieutenant Michaels presided over a
disciplinary hearing and upheld the charge in the misbehavior report. Navdeep appealed the
determination to the Superintendent, and the Superintendent upheld the misbehavior report.
59.
Following the April 23, 2005 incident, Navdeep met with a Sikh religious
authority who told Navdeep that because the Kara issue was being pursued through various
advocacy groups, he should, temporarily, comply with work orders.
2.
June 6, 2005 Misbehavior Report
60.
On June 6, 2005, Correctional Officer Lynch ordered Navdeep to clean up some
debris and Navdeep complied. Later that morning, Lynch went to check on Navdeep’s progress,
and instructed Navdeep to pick up cigarette butts on the hand ball court. Navdeep refused,
explaining that contact with tobacco, under any condition, was prohibited by the Sikh religion.
Nevertheless, Lynch issued Navdeep a Tier III misbehavior report (the most severe misbehavior
report) for refusing to follow a direct order and placed Navdeep in keeplock.
61.
After Lynch had placed Navdeep in handcuffs in order to transfer him to
keeplock, Lynch and other correctional officers walked Navdeep across the yard to a wall.
While Navdeep was facing the wall, Lynch struck Navdeep from behind with an object (possibly
his baton) across his neck and shoulder. Navdeep was then repeatedly struck by Lynch and the
other correctional officers while he lay on the floor. As a result of this incident, Navdeep
sustained injuries to his neck and shoulder. On June 17, 2005, John Doe #3 held a disciplinary
hearing. Navdeep was advised that he should have completed the task in violation of his
religious beliefs and then filed a grievance. Navdeep was placed in keeplock for three months
and assessed a five dollar surcharge. Navdeep appealed the determination to the Commissioner.
62.
On August 26, 2005, more than two months after filing his appeal and after
serving more than two-thirds of his punishment, Navdeep was informed that the Tier III
14
misbehavior report for the June 6, 2005 incident was reversed. No explanation was provided as
to why the Commissioner reversed the decision.
3.
Denial of Religious Rights in Keeplock and the Second Hunger Strike
63.
On June 6, 2005, when Navdeep was transferred to the Special Housing Unit, he
was not permitted to keep all of his religious books, but was required to leave his prayer book
with other belongings in a property bag. As part of the process of transferring Navdeep to
keeplock, the Scriptures he was permitted to bring with him were once again damaged. In
addition, Navdeep was again denied the right to wear his Kara.
a.
DOCS Denied Navdeep his Kara and Intentionally Damaged the
Kara
64.
As a result of the treatment of his religious books and the denial of Kara, on or
about June 6, 2005, Navdeep began his second hunger strike. On June 8, 2005, DOCS personnel
gave Navdeep his Kara, for a short period of time so that he could consume water. On June 10,
2005, Navdeep was again given his Kara so that he could consume water. Despite drinking that
day, on June 10, 2005, Navdeep lost consciousness and was transferred to the infirmary in the
RMU.
65.
Around this time, Navdeep was told by DOCS personnel that he would be
provided his Kara on a regular basis for meals. On or about June 17, 2005, after consulting with
religious authorities and being instructed to consume some food, Navdeep agreed to modify his
hunger strike to consume a liquid diet, including Ensure, a liquid supplement. He has, however,
refused to consume solid food in protest of the treatment of his religious articles and books as
well as DOCS denial of his right to possess other religious articles. Navdeep has slowly
increased his caloric intake over the last couple of months, but remains on a liquid diet pending
the outcome of his religious claims.
15
Dostları ilə paylaş: |