People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
Yüklə 4,04 Mb. Pdf görüntüsü
|
198 Songhao, L. (1997). Dictionary use as a way of learning vocabulary in SLA: A preliminary study. Journal of Educational Studies, 19(1), 82-99. Spiro, R. C., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (Eds.). (1980). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Stein, G. (1984). The English dictionary: past, present and future. Special lecture given on the occasion of the inauguration of the Dictionary Research Centre. Exeter: University of Exeter. Stein, G. (1990). From the bilingual to the monolingual dictionary. In T. Magay, & J. Zigany (Ed.), BudaLEX '88 Proceedings: Papers from the 3rd EURALEX International Congress (pp. 401-407). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. Stirling, J. (2003). The portable electronic dictionary: Faithful friend or faceless foe? Retrieved from http://www.elgweb.net/ped-article.html Summers, D. (1988). The role of dictionaries inlanguage learning. In R. Carter , & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary andlanguage teaching (pp. 111-125). London: Longman. Tang, G. M. (1997). EDs for second language learning: Help or hindrance? TESOL Canada Journal, 15(1), 39-57. Tarp, S. (2009). Reflections on lexicographical user research. Lexikos, 19, 275-296. Taylor, A., & Chan, A. (1994). EDs and their use. Euralex 1994 Proceedings, (pp. 598-605). 199 Thorndike, E. (1991). The psychology of the school dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography, 4(1), 15-22. Thumb, J. Y.-f. (2002). Dictionary look-up strategies and the bilingualised learners' dictionary: A think-aloud study (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong. Tomaszczyk, J. (1979). Dictionaries: Users and uses. Glottodidactica, 12, 103-119. Tomaszczyk, J. (1983). On bilingual dictionaries: The case for bilingual dictionaries for foreign language learners. In R. Hartmann (Ed.), Lexicography: Principles and practice (pp. 41-51). London: Academic Press. Tono, Y. (2001). Research on dictionary use in the context of foreign language learning. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Torres, I., & Ramos , M. (2003). Fostering vocabulary acquisition through self- learning tools and electronic dictionaries. The GRETA Magazine, 10(2). Wang, D. (2014). The impact of the use of an electronic dictionary on verbal reasoning on adult native Chinese international students in the United States (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Long Beach , California: California state university. Wang, M. (2007). The effects of dictionary skills instruction on reading comprehension of junior high EFL students in Taiwan (Unpublished master's thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University. 200 Welker, H. A. (2010). Dictonary use: A general survey of empirical studies . Brasília: Author’s Edition. Weschler, R., & Pitts, C. (2000). An experiment using electronic dictionaries with EFL students. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(8). Retrieved from The Internet TESL Journal: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Weschler-ElectroDict.html White, B. K. (2012). Understanding reading comprehension performance in high school students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University. Wingate, U. (2002). The effectiveness of different learner dictionaries. An investigation into the use of dictionaries for reading comprehension by intermediate learners of German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Winkler, B. (2001). Students working with an English learners’ dictionary on CD- ROM. In ELT perspectives on information technology & multimedia-Selected papers from the ITMELT 2001 Conference 1st & 2 June, 2001 (pp. 227-254). Hong Kong: The English Language Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Yorio, C. (1971). Some sources of reading problems for foreign language learners. Language Learning, 21, 107-115. APPENDICES Appendix A: Reading task in CD condition By far the most important United States export product in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was cotton, favored by the European textile industry over flax or wool because it was easy to process and soft to tile touch. Mechanization of spinning and weaving allowed significant centralization and expansion in the textile industry during this period, and at the same time the demand for cotton increased dramatically. American producers were able to meet this demand largely because of tile invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793. Cotton could be grown throughout the South, but separating the fiber – or lint – from the seed was a laborious process. Sea Island cotton was relatively easy to process by hand, because its fibers were long and seeds were concentrated at the base of the flower, but it demanded a long growing season, available only along the nation's eastern seacoast. Short- staple cotton required a much shorter growing season, but the shortness of the fibers and their mixture with seeds meant that a worker could hand-process only about one pound per day. Whitney's gin was a hand-powered machine with revolving drums and metal teeth to pull cotton fibers away from seeds. Using the gin, a worker could produce up to 50 pounds of lint a day. The later development of larger gins, powered by horses, water, or steam, multiplied productivity further. The interaction of improved processing and high demand led to the rapid spread of the cultivation of cotton and to a surge in production. It became the main American export, dwarfing all others. In 1802, cotton composed 14 percent of total American exports by value. Cotton had a 36 percent share by 1810 and over a 50 percent share in 1830. In 1860, 61 percent of the value of American exports was represented by cotton. In contrast, wheat and wheat flour composed only 6 percent of the value of American exports in that year. Clearly, cotton was king in the trade of the young republic. The growing market for cotton and other American agricultural products led to an unprecedented expansion of agricultural settlement, Yüklə 4,04 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|