Philopatris (
, loving one’s country, patriot) in which the Christians are ridiculed and
condemned as enemies of the Roman empire, is of a much later date, probably from the reign
of Julian the Apostate (363). See Gesner: De aetate et auctore Philopatridis, Jen. 1714.
Jacob:
Charakteristik Lucians
. Hamburg 1822.
G. G. Bernays:
Lucian und die Cyniker
. Berlin. 1879.
Comp. Keim: Celsus, 143–151; Ed. D. Zeller:
Alexander und Peregrinus
, in the "Deutsche Rundschau,"
for Jan. 1877; Henry Cotterill: Peregrinus Proteus (Edinb. 1879); Ad. Harnack in Herzog (ed.
II.), VIII. 772–779; and the Lit. quoted in § 28.
In the same period the rhetorician Lucian (born at Samosata in Syria about 120, died in Egypt
or Greece before 200), the Voltaire of Grecian literature, attacked the Christian religion with the
same light weapons of wit and ridicule, with which, in his numerous elegantly written works, he
assailed the old popular faith and worship, the mystic fanaticism imported from the East, the vulgar
life of the Stoics and Cynics of that day, and most of the existing manners and customs of the
distracted period of the empire. An Epicurean, worldling, and infidel, as he was, could see in
Christianity only one of the many vagaries and follies of mankind; in the miracles, only jugglery;
in the belief of immortality, an empty dream; and in the contempt of death and the brotherly love
of the Christians, to which he was constrained to testify, a silly enthusiasm.
Thus he represents the matter in an historical romance on the life and death of Peregrinus
Proteus, a contemporary Cynic philosopher, whom he make the basis of a satire upon Christianity,
and especially upon Cynicism. Peregrinus is here presented as a perfectly contemptible man, who,
after the meanest and grossest crimes, adultery, sodomy, and parricide, joins the credulous Christians
in Palestine, cunningly imposes on them, soon rises to the highest repute among them, and, becoming
one of the confessors in prison, is loaded with presents by them, in fact almost worshipped as a
god, but is afterwards excommunicated for eating some forbidden food (probably meat of the
idolatrous sacrifices); then casts himself into the arms of the Cynics, travels about everywhere, in
the filthiest style of that sect; and at last about the year 165, in frantic thirst for fame, plunges into
the flames of a funeral pile before the assembled populace of the town of Olympia, for the triumph
of philosophy. This fiction of the self-burning was no doubt meant for a parody on the Christian
martyrdom, perhaps with special reference to Polycarp, who a few years before had suffered death
by fire at Smyrna (155).
82
1
Lucian treated the Christians rather with a compassionate smile, than with hatred. He
nowhere urges persecution. He never calls Christ an impostor, as Celsus does, but a "crucified
sophist;" a term which he uses as often in a good sense as in the bad. But then, in the end, both the
Christian and the heathen religions amount, in his view, to imposture; only, in his Epicurean
indifferentism, he considers it not worth the trouble to trace such phenomena to their ultimate
ground, and attempt a philosophical explanation.
83
2
82
Harnack, l.c. denies a reference to Polycarp.
83
Berneys (l.c. p. 43) characterizes Lucian very unfavorably: "ein anscheinend nicht sehr glücklicher Advocat, ist er ohne
ernste Studien ins Literatenthum übergegangen; unwissend und leichtfertig trägt er lediglich eine nihilistische Oede in Bezuq
auf alle religiösen und metaphysischen Fraqen zur Schau und reisst alle als verkehrt und lächerlich herunter." Berneys thinks
that the Peregrinus Proteus is not directed against the Christians, but against the Cynic philosophers and more particularly against
the then still living Theagenes.
62
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
The merely negative position of this clever mocker of all religions injured heathenism more
than Christianity, but could not be long maintained against either; the religious element is far too
deeply seated in the essence of human nature. Epicureanism and scepticism made way, in their
turns, for Platonism, and for faith or superstition. Heathenism made a vigorous effort to regenerate
itself, in order to hold its ground against the steady advance of Christianity. But the old religion
itself could not help feeling more and more the silent influence of the new.
§ 34. Neo-Platonism.
I. Sources.
Plotinus: Opera Omnia, ed. Oxf 1835, 3 vols.; ed. Kirchhoff, Lips. 1856; ed. Didot, Par. 1856; H.
F. Müller, Berlin 1878–80.
Porphyrius:
(fragments collected in Holstein: Dissert. de vita et scriptis Porphyr. Rom.
1630). His biographies of Pythagoras, Plotinus, and other works were ed. by A. A. Nauck, 1860.
Hierocles:
(fragments in Euse b.: Contra Hierocl. lib., and probably also in Macarius
Magnes:
Par. 1876).
Philostratus: De Vita Apollonii Tyanensis libri octo (Greek and Latin), Venet. 1501; ed. Westerman,
Par. 1840; ed. Kayser, Zürich, 1853, 1870. Also in German, French and English translations.
II. Works.
Vogt:
Neuplatonismus u. Christenthum
. Berl. 1836.
Ritter:
Gesch. der Philos
. vol. 4th, 1834 (in English by Morrison, Oxf. 1838).
Neander:
Ueber das neunte Buch in der zweiten Enneade des Plotinus
. 1843. (vid. Neander’s Wissenschaftl.
Abhandlungen, published by Jacobi, Berl. 1851, p. 22 sqq.)
Ullmann:
Einflusz des Christentums auf Porphyrius
, in "Stud. u. Krit." 1832.
Kirchner:
Die Philosophie des Plotin
. Halle, 1854.
F. Chr. Baur:
Apollonius von Tyana u. Christus
. Tüb. 1832, republ. by Ed. Zeller, in
Drei Abhandlungen zur Gesch.
der alten Philosophie U. ihres Verh. zum Christenthum
. Leipzig, 1876, pp. 1–227.
John H. Newman: Apollonius Tyanaeus. Lond. 1849 (Encycl. Metropol. Vol. X., pp. 619–644).
A. Chassang:
Ap. de T., sa vie, ses voyages, ses prodiges
, etc. Paris, 1862. Translation from the Greek, with
explanatory notes.
H. Kellner:
Porphyrius und sein Verhültniss zum Christenthum
, in the Tübingen "Theol. Quartalschrift," 1865. No.
I.
Albert Réville: Apollonius of Tyana, the Pagan Christ of the third century, translated from the
French. Lond. 1866.
K. Mönkeberg: Apollonius v. Tyana. Hamb. 1877.
Fr. Ueberweg: History of Philosophy (Eng. transl. N. York, 1871), vol. I. 232–259.
Ed. Zeller:
Philosophie der Griechen
, III. 419 sqq.
More earnest and dignified, but for this very reason more lasting and dangerous, was the
opposition which proceeded directly and indirectly from Neo-Platonism. This system presents the
last phase, the evening red, so to speak, of the Grecian philosophy; a fruitless effort of dying
heathenism to revive itself against the irresistible progress of Christianity in its freshness and vigor.
It was a pantheistic eclecticism and a philosophico-religious syncretism, which sought to reconcile
Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy with Oriental religion and theosophy, polytheism with
63
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.