Investment in infrastructure three pillars of city resilience


Western super-collector, Casablanca, Morocco



Yüklə 55,06 Kb.
səhifə11/22
tarix22.03.2024
ölçüsü55,06 Kb.
#180534
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   22
LVC overview June6

Western super-collector, Casablanca, Morocco
Impact Fees: Overview
INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
DESCRIPTION
    • Developers are assessed an extra cash charge to compensate the cost of area-wide infrastructure upgrades.
    • Per standard scheme, it is a one-time charge applied routinely by a local jurisdiction to real estate development projects contemplated in the area impacted by infrastructure upgrades. The proceeds from the charge finance (or refinance) a portion of the cost of facilities upgrades.
    • Such charge is assessed on a formula that considers benefit allocation, intensity of land use, distance to the upgraded infrastructure etc.

    • KEY REQUIREMENTS / IMPLEMENTATION FACTORS
    • Strong planning and analytical capacity at local level needed for planning and costing infrastructure upgrades, along with devising a solid approach in allocation of benefits across different locations / projects.
    • Strong execution of public investment plans.
    • Transparent and stringent formula for impact fee calculation (allowing developers to credibly project impact fees in development financial pro forms).

Impact Fees: Lessons Learned
INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPPORTUNITIES
CHALLENGES
    • Relatively straightforward two-way transaction
    • Minimal negative fiscal impact (e.g. municipal cash flow is not ring-fenced in any way)
    • Efficient tool to redistribute costs of development-enabling infrastructure (avoids overburdening of first-comers and free-riding of followers)
    • Extra charges may hinder development activity.
    • If applied improperly may become a disincentive to develop land to its highest and best use
    • Infrastructure benefits are distributed unevenly. Imperfections in apportioning off-site costs are inevitable
    • Works best for hard and basic infrastructure that has direct and quantifiable impact (such as transit or sewer/water upgrades). Less prudent for infrastructure items where short-term impacts are less tangible (e.g. resilience enhancement, “green” infrastructure).


Yüklə 55,06 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   ...   22




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə