|
Investment in infrastructure three pillars of city resilienceWestern super-collector, Casablanca, Morocco
|
səhifə | 11/22 | tarix | 22.03.2024 | ölçüsü | 55,06 Kb. | | #180534 |
| LVC overview June6Western super-collector, Casablanca, Morocco
Impact Fees: Overview
INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
DESCRIPTION
- Developers are assessed an extra cash charge to compensate the cost of area-wide infrastructure upgrades.
- Per standard scheme, it is a one-time charge applied routinely by a local jurisdiction to real estate development projects contemplated in the area impacted by infrastructure upgrades. The proceeds from the charge finance (or refinance) a portion of the cost of facilities upgrades.
- Such charge is assessed on a formula that considers benefit allocation, intensity of land use, distance to the upgraded infrastructure etc.
KEY REQUIREMENTS / IMPLEMENTATION FACTORS
- Strong planning and analytical capacity at local level needed for planning and costing infrastructure upgrades, along with devising a solid approach in allocation of benefits across different locations / projects.
- Strong execution of public investment plans.
- Transparent and stringent formula for impact fee calculation (allowing developers to credibly project impact fees in development financial pro forms).
Impact Fees: Lessons Learned
INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPPORTUNITIES
CHALLENGES
- Relatively straightforward two-way transaction
- Minimal negative fiscal impact (e.g. municipal cash flow is not ring-fenced in any way)
- Efficient tool to redistribute costs of development-enabling infrastructure (avoids overburdening of first-comers and free-riding of followers)
- Extra charges may hinder development activity.
- If applied improperly may become a disincentive to develop land to its highest and best use
- Infrastructure benefits are distributed unevenly. Imperfections in apportioning off-site costs are inevitable
- Works best for hard and basic infrastructure that has direct and quantifiable impact (such as transit or sewer/water upgrades). Less prudent for infrastructure items where short-term impacts are less tangible (e.g. resilience enhancement, “green” infrastructure).
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|