T. M. Stepanskaya, L. I. Nekhvyadovich
164
the
picture The Peasant Dinner. We see the scene, full of inner significance
and almost ritual solemnity. An old woman puts a dish of food on the table
with gravity, whilst a young peasant is cutting the bread. His soft glance is
turned to his wife, who has taken off her quilted jacket, and is gazing
admiringly at her child. There is a feeling that she attracts him with her
careful movements. Her face is lit with the expression of motherliness and
hidden sadness. This barely perceptible expression, subtle, coming from
eyes, adds to the heroine’s spirituality. Essentially, in this picture, Shibanov
conveys the poetry of peasant life and, at the same time, its hidden sadness.
The figures are depicted full-sized; they are placed in a group, close to
each other. The action comes to the foreground. There is magnanimity in
the position of the figures, in their calm actions. The location of the figures
is subject to the rules of circular composition: the lines of silhouettes repeat
each other, connecting individual figures to an organic whole. The detailed
depictions of ordinary items such as a bowl food, a loaf of brown bread and
the icon in the corner are attributes personifying the fundamental principles
of peasant life. The graphic structure of the picture, the balance of colours
in red-brown and golden-pink shades conjure thoughts of Russian
ethnocultural traditions as a possible source of inspiration for the Russian
master.
An ethnographical approach is also evident in Shibanov’s
Celebration of
the Wedding Contract. The authors specifically highlight this picture from
amongst all the artistic heritage of the 18
th
century for the way in which it
demonstrates the painter’s interest in depicting scenes from peasant life,
underlining the peculiarities of everyday life typical of that district. The
precision with which the costumes and headgear worn by Suzdalian peasant
women are depicted, not to mention the detail in the embroidered motifs of
the bride’s dress, follows from this.
The picture’s compositional structure has the following features: the
location of figures is symmetrical with the main figures - the bridal pair - in
the centre; they are emphasised by light and colour, in full accordance with
academic rules. Seated male figures on the right and left denote the
foreground, while a woman in a smart kokoshnik (decorative head-dress) is
placed behind the young pair. The compositional and colouristic layout
indicates the impact of the principles of historical painting. Y. V. Bruk
correlates this phenomenon with general tendencies in Russian artistic
culture:
“In their drive for authenticity, the Shibanov’s pictures find their place in
the range of such phenomena of Russian culture in 1779 as the first
collections of national songs; the first ‘dictionaries’ and ‘lexicons’ providing
www.cclbsebes.ro/muzeul-municipal-ioan-raica.html / www.cimec.ro
Ethnocultural Traditions as a Basis of National Originality of Schools of Art
165
descriptions of folk festivals, plays, legends and superstitions; [and] the first
comic operas, where vernaculars and dialects are used.”
18
Art historians of the 19
th
century agree that Russian genre painting
begins with the works of A. G. Venetsianov (1780-1847).
19
The novelty of
their ethnographical narrative and the originality of their artistic manner
ensured the persistent significance of these works for many decades to
come; indeed, they are seen as defining the national originality of the
Russian School. Russian genre painting is seen as a variant of the peasant
genre. In Russian genre painting, peasant scenes are accompanied by nature,
set against a background depicting the landscape. The fine art expert M.
Allenova characterises the value of Venetsianov’s artistic heritage, writing:
“Through his works, Russian art attained its picturesque language, its
patterns of rhythm and colour, where not only the ‘face’ was expressed, but
also the character, ‘the soul’ of Russian nature - the plain rural landscape of
the Russian interior with a dim high sky, long soft lines [and] the
melancholic colour of a monotonous desolate vastness.”
20
Canvases of the artist such as In the Field: Spring (1820), During Harvesting:
Summer (1820),
The Soldier’s Return (1830) and
Zakharka (1825), testify to this.
The determination of nationalist issues resulted in the development of
national-historical painting in the Russian fine art of the mid-19
th
century.
21
This theme was vividly expressed in the arts of historical and genre painting,
which were closely interrelated. National-historical narratives were subject
to significant change, but one that remained constant over a long period of
time was the connection of historical themes with modernity. As the art
historian, A Benois, states, “Historicism, as if embedded in modernity,
became the internal property of art, overcoming genre boundaries.”
22
In the second half of the 19
th
century, the development of the Russian
School took place under conditions of the formation of a national identity
and the search for a new, personal identity by the Russian man; a movement
which found personification in images of Russian nature. In academic
literature, there is no definitive agreement on either the chronological
boundaries of the Russian landscape painting tradition or the content of this
genre. Among the variety of viewpoints, the fundamental one is the
comparative-historical concept, developed by A. A. Fedorov-Davydov,
23
F.
S. Maltseva,
24
V. S. Manin
25
and V. A. Lenyashin.
26
Defining the
18
Bruk 1990, p. 231.
19
Yakovleva 2005, p. 13.
20
Allenova 2008, p. 100.
21
Yakovleva 2005, p. 17.
22
Benua 1998, p. 33.
23
Fedorov-Davydov 1986.
24
Maltseva 1952.
www.cclbsebes.ro/muzeul-municipal-ioan-raica.html / www.cimec.ro