The Mater Dolorosa of Ancient Rough Cilicia: Tracking an Archetype Prof. Matthew Dillon



Yüklə 504 b.
tarix17.10.2017
ölçüsü504 b.
#5145


The Mater Dolorosa of Ancient Rough Cilicia: Tracking an Archetype

  • Prof. Matthew Dillon

  • Dept. of Classics and Archaeology

  • Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles








Some Context: Who Are These People?

  • Rough Cilician coast exposed to various influences (including pirates!):

    • Phoenician (cf. legend of Cilix)
    • Greek
    • Roman
    • Egyptian (under Cleopatra)
  • But native population group dominates

    • Luwians, related to Hittites






Luwian Language

  • Hieroglyphic Script used by Hittites (2nd mill. BCE)

  • Following collapse of Hittite empire (ca. 1200 BCE), “Neo-Hittite” kingdoms of eastern Anatolia provide extensive corpus of Luwian inscriptions (11th-8th c. BCE)

  • Local scripts in Lycia, Pamphylia last until 3rd c. BCE

  • Spoken language still in use in 1st c. CE

    • Paul & Barnabas addressed in Lycaonian dialect, Acts 14:11










Luwian Remnants in Rough Cilicia

  • Of over 2,200 inscriptions from western Rough Cilicia, NONE in native language

  • But nomenclature indicates ethnic dominance of native Luwians

    • Ca. 75% of names non-Greek, mostly Luwian
  • Some evidence of Lycian influence



E.g.: Name List from Korykion Antron



Lycian Influence?



Recap

  • Luwian People of Rough Cilicia indigenous since the Bronze Age

  • Iron Age power centers in East

  • Extensive Greek influence in Hellenistic period

    • Language & Politics
  • In RC, native artistic traditions survive into Roman Period

    • Most sites from 1st-4th centuries CE
      • Dating based on surface pottery, inscriptions




Basic Assumptions

  • Female figure of importance/power

  • Mature, respectable (veil)

  • Mother/Wife

  • Funerary

    • Mournful attitude
    • Location in or near necropoleis
  • Ergo, mater dolorosa “sorrowful mother”

  • Repetitions indicate “type”

    • Can we speak of “archetype”?
  • Trace first mater, then dolorosa in Anatolia



What is an “Archetype”?

  • Greek : pattern, model

  • Appropriated by C.G. Jung for symbols (“primordial images”) from collective unconscious

    • Used to analyze neuroses:
      • “The mother archetype forms the foundation for the so-called mother complex….Typical effects on the son are homosexuality and Don Juanism, and sometimes also impotence.”
        • “Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype”, from:
        • C.G. Jung, Four Archetypes, Princeton 1970, p. 19.


Back to Basics

  • Term still useful in mythology/art:

    • Recurrent symbol from human experience
  • Strong examples of basic archetypes:

    • Father (sky god, king)
    • Mother (earth goddess, queen)


Ancient Sky Gods



Mother Goddesses

  • Various Types/Archetypes

  • Emphasis on:

    • Power (mater natura, “Mother Nature”)
      • Dominatrix?
    • Fertility (alma mater, “nourishing mother”)
    • Loss (mater dolorosa, “sorrowful mother”)
  • Startling concentration of female power in Anatolia

    • Matrix of all mothers!


Neolithic Mothers

  • Hacilar and Çatal Höyük offer striking examples from 7th-6th mill. BCE

  • Animal imagery survives 5,000 year gap!



Hittite Arinna

  • Little Evidence for Bronze Age Mother Cult

  • Sun goddess Arinna appears at Yazilikaya, near Hittite capital (13th c. BCE)

    • Note mountains, lion, high crown (polos)


Neo-Hittite Kubaba

  • Localized around Karkemish, ca. 950-700 BCE

  • Attributes: polos (high crown), pomegranate, mirror

  • Attested as far west as

  • Sardis in Lydia



The Great Mother (Magna Mater)

  • Most important mother cult in Mediterranean

  • Localized in Phrygia, spread far & wide

    • Phrygians enter central Anatolia ca. 900 BCE
  • Only Phrygian deity attested in art, inscriptions

  • Name is simply Matar (Mother)

    • But epithet kubileya (“mountain”?) establishes specious connection with Kubaba, widely accepted
  • Greeks & Romans called

  • her , Cybele



Matar’s Iconography

  • Stands upright (in naiskos)

  • Attributes: polos, bird, lion, jug





Growth of the Matar Cult: Greece

  • Adopted as (), 

  • Short Homeric Hymn (6th c. BCE?) refers to ecstatic music, animals, mountains

  • Ionia a likely point of intersection

  • Metroon in Athenian Agora at

  • heart of civic center

  • • But cult overshadowed by

  • Mysteries of Demeter



Magna Mater in Rome

  • Sibylline Books direct cult image to be brought from Phrygia with great fanfare in 204 BCE.

  • Sources describe aniconic stone (meteorite?)

  • Ovid (Fasti 4.179ff.) narrates Quinta Claudia’s miracle

  • Popular cult also intrigues Lucretius (DRN 2.600ff), Catullus (c. 63)



Unsavory Aspects?

  • Literary sources emphasize castration

    • Complex Myth of Attis adapted in Catullus 63
      • Dea, magna dea, Cybebe, dea domina Dindymi!
    • Galli (eunuch priests of cult) notorious
  • Calling Dr. Jung!

  • But little evidence from Anatolia!



Mater Dominatrix?

  • Several myths associate dominant female with subordinate male

    • Cybele and Attis
    • Inanna and Dumuzi (Mesopotamian)
    • Venus and Adonis
  • Intersection with “Mistress of Animals” (Potnia Theron) motif?

    • Mother Nature has power to control, terrify




Syncretism: Unity in Diversity

  • Merging of cults inevitable

    • Apuleius provides locus classicus (Metam. 11.5)
      • Isis cult adds to Mediterranean mix
  • Ephesus, capital of Roman Asia, provides fertile ground for interaction

    • Luwian Apasa?
    • Center of Artemis cult
    • Christian crossroads


Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!

  • Roots of unique cult image unknown

  • Temple a Wonder of the World

  • Paul ousted from theater by devotees (Acts 19.23ff.)





Another Ephesian Goddess?

  • Scripture puts Mary, mother of Jesus, in John’s care (John 19.25-27)

  • John allegedly buried near Ephesus

  • “Mary’s House” located (1891) via visions of Sr. Anne Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824)

    • Her visions also guided Gibson’s Passion!
  • House now a cult site for BVM





The Cult of Mary

  • “Mariolatry” officially rejected

  • by Roman Catholicism

    • But “apparitions” most common of all
  • Virgin, Mother, Queen unite archetypes

    • Cf. Virgin/fertility cult of Ephesian Artemis
  • Emphasis less on power, domination

  • Opens door for more human aspects

    • Alma Mater (“nourishing mother”)
    • Mater Dolorosa (“sorrowful mother”)


Alma Mater



Mater Dolorosa



Origins of Mater Dolorosa

  • Archetype closes circle of life and death

  • Women’s role in Funerary ritual crucial

  • More prevalent in Myth than in Art

    • Thetis, in Iliad (set in NW Anatolia)
    • Demeter, at Eleusis near Athens
    • Niobe, turned to stone in Lydia
    • Penelope, for husband and son
  • Can we connect to RC reliefs?







The Women of Rough Cilicia

  • Epigraphy gives (limited) view of female roles in Roman period (1st-4th c. CE)

  • Women figure prominently in both funerary and honorific texts

  • Inscriptions suggest fair amount of respect, independence, visibility

  • “Lineage Society” model must take women into account



Funerary Evidence

  • Some communal tombs place in separate chambers (men above, women below)

    • But not all, and couples are often buried together
  • Men erect tombs for wives, daughters, mothers-in-law

    • “Tomb holds us like one bedroom and one bed” (OlB46)
  • Wives erect tombs for husbands

  • Women erect tombs for themselves

    • Priestess of Demeter for “self and no one else” (Kan22)
  • Mothers erect tombs for daughters

  • Daughters erect tombs for fathers

  • Brothers erect tombs for sisters



Honorary Inscriptions

  • Wives, daughters, mothers honored with statues by “Council and People”

    • For “modesty”, “respectability”, “consular” rank
    • One woman served as gymnasiarch (Kes4a)
  • Women pay for statues, columns, public dinners

    • Wife and daughter build public propylaion (Kzb6)
  • Cf. civic activity of Plancia Magna at Perge (ca. 80 mi. W. of RC)



Conclusions

  • Female powers in Anatolia run gamut of archetypes

    • Dolorosa type counterbalances Dominatrix
  • Prominence of mater dolorosa motif in RC suggests acknowledgement of female power, esp. in funerary context

  • Indigenous Luwians of RC maintain cultural identity in multicultural Roman empire

    • Women apparently active, visible in civic life and death


Yüklə 504 b.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə