BMJ
| 18 MAY 2013 | VOLUME 346
29
OBITUARIES
Robert Edwards
Pioneer of in vitro fertilisation
It is difficult for clinicians and scientists now
to appreciate the antipathy and repugnance
to Bob’s work between the 1960s and 1980s;
it was viewed as unnatural and ungodly, and
the slippery slope to Aldous Huxley’s Brave
New World. There were calls from the BMA for a
halt to all embryo research, and, even after the
birth of Louise Brown, the first child to be born
after IVF, calls from a US Senate committee for
a moratorium.
Bob did not brush aside these criticisms but
took them seriously, as he did most things. He
spent time in the early 1970s contemplating
the ethical issues raised and published widely
on bioethics from 1971.
9
With characteristic
energy he proceeded to talk publicly about the
work and to encourage debate—for which he
was also roundly criticised by his colleagues.
His visionary ideas were way ahead of his time:
whether scientifically, ethically, or in educating
the public about science. His 1965 paper in the
Lancet on human egg maturation charted with
remarkable and characteristic foresight a pro-
gramme for assisted reproductive technology
for the next 20 years.
10
He set the foundations
for preimplantation
genetic diagnosis
11
and
understood the importance of embryonic stem
cells for regenerative medicine.
He leaves his wife, Ruth, five daughters, and
12 grandchildren.
Peter Braude, emeritus professor of obstetrics and
gynaecology, King’s College London
peter.braude@kcl.ac.uk
Martin Johnson, professor of reproductive sciences,
University of Cambridge
References are in the version on bmj.com.
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2600
Bob Edwards was an extraordinarily gifted sci-
entist. Few biologists have had such a positive
and practical impact on the future of mankind
through their basic research. For it was Bob, his
clinical colleague Patrick Steptoe, and laboratory
assistant Jean Purdy who in 1978 were to achieve
the first birth after in vitro fertilisation (IVF),
1
a
technique that has brought joy to millions of pre-
viously infertile couples.
Rather than a backroom boffin, Bob was
immersed completely in the development of clini-
cal progress through his deep understanding of
reproductive biology and genetics, his prodigious
knowledge of mammalian biology and animal
husbandry,
2
and his empathy for the plight of
the “undeserving infertile.”
The possibility that fertilisation could be
manipulated or assisted in the laboratory
had been mooted by the early experiments of
Gregory Pincus, inventor of the oral contraceptive
pill, and referred to in a prophetic 1937 editorial
entitled “Conception in a watch glass.”
3
Bob was
passionate about the possibility that infertile cou-
ples could be helped by new techniques being
developed in the laboratory, and exemplified the
principle of translational science: of bringing
ideas from bench to bedside.
Robert Geoffrey Edwards was one of three
brothers from humble beginnings in Yorkshire.
His Mancunian mother worked as a mill machin-
ist, and his father as a railway worker. He was
schooled at Manchester Central High School
for Boys, and his further education was unim-
pressive. Conscripted into the army in 1943, he
later read agricultural sciences at the University
College of North Wales but, disillusioned by the
non-scientific content, transferred to zoology. To
his dismay he managed only a pass, not honours.
In debt and disconsolate, he was amazed and
delighted to be accepted on to a diploma course
in animal genetics in Edinburgh, followed by a
PhD. There he undertook experiments in mice
towards the understanding of the role of chromo-
somes and chromosome number in the genera-
tion of developmental anomaly—novel research
in those early days of developmental genetics. It
was here that he met his wife and lifelong collabo-
rator, Ruth Fowler. The experiments that Bob and
Ruth undertook involved study of the dynamics
of egg meiotic maturation, for which together
they developed hormonal ovarian stimulation
regimens, which formed the basis for those used
in IVF today.
4
He moved to the department of physiology in
Cambridge in 1963 after periods overseas and at
the National Institute for Medical Research at Mill
Hill. He became increasingly interested in study-
ing egg maturation events in the human, initially
as a route to understanding the origins and early
diagnosis of genetic disorders such as Down’s
syndrome. These experiments required human
eggs, but at that time the only way to obtain them
was through their incidental retrieval at laparot-
omy for other gynaecological procedures.
5
This
is where his chance meeting with Patrick Steptoe
was to prove crucial. Steptoe was a pioneer of the
newly developing art of laparoscopy that allowed
him access to women’s ovaries though “keyhole”
surgery.
Steptoe was regarded as a bit of a maverick.
Not wholly accepted by the gynaecological
establishment, he worked in a cottage hospital
in Oldham in Lancashire. This necessitated many
a trip for Bob or Jean Purdy bringing eggs from
Oldham to Cambridge for the early experiments
to develop the basic techniques needed.
6
Their
landmark papers demonstrating the feasibility of
human fertilisation
7
and early development
8
in
the laboratory were pivotal in underpinning the
later clinical techniques. These were to bring him
into conflict with religious groups, especially the
Catholic church, which opposed all work involv-
ing artificial conception, as it does to this day.
Indeed, the day after Bob was awarded the 2010
Nobel prize for medicine, a critical Vatican state-
ment was issued decrying the award.
With characteristic
energy Edwards
proceeded to
talk publicly
about his work
and to encourage
debate—for which
he was also roundly
criticised
by his colleagues
Robert Geoffrey Edwards PhD (Edin.) DSc (Wales)
FRS, physiologist, born 27 September 1925;
died 10 April 2013. CBE 1988, knighted 2011.
Lasker Prize for Clinical Medical Research 2001,
Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2010.
Robert Edwards with
one of the babies born
as a result of his
pioneering technique
REBE
CCA
NADEN
/P
A