Toxicological Review of Barium and Compounds



Yüklə 0,55 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə21/33
tarix24.02.2018
ölçüsü0,55 Mb.
#28018
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   33

reduced calcium intake and hypertension, and because hypertension has not been reported in 

animals receiving the recommended dietary concentration of calcium, the data from Perry et al. 

(1989, 1985) were not considered further in the derivation of the RfD. 

Acute hypertension has been observed in humans after accidental or intentional ingestion 

of soluble barium salts (CDC, 2003; Downs et al., 1995).  Two human studies have investigated 

the effects of longer-term barium ingestion on blood pressure (Wones et al., 1990; Brenniman et 

al., 1981).  Both investigations found no hypertensive effect with their highest exposure 

concentrations.  Brenniman and Levy (1984) found no effect on hypertension between two 

communities with a 70-fold difference in the barium concentrations of their drinking water. 

Wones et al. (1990) found no hypertensive effect in a before and after comparison of 11 subjects 

that were exposed to two concentrations of barium in their drinking water over the course of 10 

weeks.  Coincidently, the same NOAEL of 0.21 mg/kg-day was identified for both studies. 

These NOAELs were estimated by EPA using standard estimates for drinking water intake 

(2 L/day) and average body weight (70 kg). 

Neither Brenniman et al. (1981) nor Wones et al. (1990) provided sufficient data to 

support or refute the hypothesis that chronic barium exposure causes hypertension. Hypertension 

is a complex multifactorial condition, and it is very possible that the effect of chronic barium 

exposure on blood pressure is relatively small compared to other determinates, such as diet and 

exercise.  Wones et al. (1990) attempted to control for the effect of diet by providing a standard 

diet to all of the study participants.  Unfortunately, the power of this study was limited by the 

very small number of participants (n=11).  They also used short exposure durations (4 weeks for 

each exposure concentration), which may not have been sufficient to observe a chronic effect. 

Brenniman et al. (1981) also examined a relatively small number of subjects (n=85) in the 

subpopulation that was controlled for key risk factors.  Other limitations of Brenniman et al. 

(1981) were that they collected replicate blood pressure measurements from individuals during a 

single 20-minute period, they used community-wide exposure estimates, and they didn’t control 

for a number of important risk factors for hypertension, including diet and exercise.  In the 

absence of dose-response data for barium-induced hypertension, the RfD was not based on this 

effect. 

The effect of barium on reproductive functions was evaluated in rats and mice by Dietz et 

al. (1992).  A significant reduction in litter size was observed in mice receiving a barium dose of 

approximately 100 mg/kg-day, but a dose of approximately 200 mg/kg-day did not produce that 

effect.  Birth weight in rat pups was significantly reduced in the 200 mg/kg-day treatment group, 

42



but no effect was observed at postnatal day 5.  The observed effects, decreased birth weight and 

decreased litter size, were either transient or not dose-dependent.  These data suggest that any 

potential reproductive effect of barium is likely to occur at a dose higher than that found to 

produce nephropathy in mice. 

In consideration of  the available data on the adverse effects of chronic and subchronic 

barium ingestion in humans and animals, the increased incidence of chemical-related 

nephropathy in mice provides the best evidence of a dose-response relationship.  For this reason, 

the chronic mouse study conducted by NTP (1994) was selected as the principal study and 

nephropathy was identified as the critical effect for deriving the RfD. 

43



Table 5–1.  Effects of subchronic and chronic oral barium exposure on rodents 

Species 

Duration 

Sex 

Estimated barium 

doses (mg/kg-day) 

Incidence of 

nephropathy 

Effect on kidney weight 

Rat 


13 weeks 

0, 10, 30, 65, 110, 

Control: 0/10 

Increased relative wt. 

200 


High dose: 3/10 

(200 mg/kg-day) 

0, 10, 35, 65, 115, 

Control: 0/10 

High dose: 3/10 

Increased relative wt. 

(

$65 mg/kg-day); Increased 



relative wt. & absolute wt. 

180 



(

$115 mg/kg-day) 

2 years 

0, 15, 30, 60 



Control: 46/47 

High dose: 47/49 

Decreased absolute wt. 

(

$30 mg/kg-day) 



Control: 43/48 

Increased relative wt. 

0, 15, 45, 75 



High dose:  48/50 

(

$45 mg/kg-day) 



Mouse 

13 weeks 

0, 15, 55, 100, 205, 

Control: 0/10 

Decreased absolute wt. 

450 



High dose: 10/10 

(450 mg/kg-day) 

0, 15, 60, 110, 200, 

Control: 0/10 

Increased relative wt. 

495 



High dose: 9/10 

(495 mg/kg-day) 

15­

Control: 1/59 



months/ 

Inter. dose: 2/58 

No effect 

2 years


0, 30, 75, 160 



High dose: 19/60 

(160 mg/kg-day) 

Control: 0/60 

Inter. dose: 1/60 

No effect 

0, 40, 90, 200 



High dose: 37/60 

(200 mg/kg-day) 

a

 Animals from both the 15-month and 2-year evaluations were considered in this evaluation because of the 



reduced life expectancy of mice in the high dose group. 

Source: NTP, 1994. 



5.1.2.  Methods of Analysis 

The incidence of nephropathy in mice chronically exposed to barium in drinking water 

was modeled using EPA’s Benchmark Dose Modeling Software Version 1.3.2 (U.S. EPA, 

BMDS).  All of the available models for dichotomous endpoints were fitted to the incidence data 

shown in Table 5–2.  Details of the modeling and the model output for the best fitting model are 

provided in Appendix B.  Best fit was determined using the criteria in the draft Benchmark Dose 



Technical Guidance Document (U.S. EPA, 2000c): the lowest Akaike Information Criterion 

(AIC) among the models with adequate fits (p>0.1).  Third degree and fifth degree multistage 

models provided the best fit for the male and female data, respectively; these models are 

summarized in Table 5–3.  These best-fitting models also had the lowest benchmark doses 

(BMDs) and BMDLs (95% lower bound on benchmark dose) for each data set. 

44



Yüklə 0,55 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   ...   33




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə