U.S. EPA. (1998b) Science policy council handbook: peer review. Prepared by
the Office of Science Policy, Office
of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/100/B-98/001. Available from: National Technical
Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA; PB98-140726, and
.
U.S. EPA. (1998c) Toxicological Review of Barium and Compounds. Available from IRIS Hotline, Washington,
DC (202) 566-1676.
U.S. EPA. (1999) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment [review draft]. Risk Assessment Forum, Washington,
DC. NCEA-F-0644. Available from: .
U.S. EPA. (2000a) Science policy council handbook: peer review. 2nd edition. Prepared by the Office of Science
Policy, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/100/B-00/001. Available from:
.
U.S. EPA. (2000b) Science policy council handbook: risk characterization. Prepared by the Office of Science Policy,
Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. EPA/100/B-00/002. Available from:
.
U.S. EPA. (2000c) Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document [external review draft]. EPA/630/R-00/001.
Available from:
http://www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/claritgw?op-Display&document=clserv:ORD:0603;&rank=4&template=epa
U.S. EPA. (2000d) Supplementary guidance for conducting health risk assessment of chemical mixtures.
EPA/630/R-00/002. Available from: .
U.S. EPA. (2002) A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes. Risk Assessment Forum,
Washington, DC; EPA/630/P-02/0002F. Available from: .
Walter, SJ; Shirley, DG; Folkerd, EJ; et al. (2001) Effects of the potassium channel blocker barium on sodium and
potassium transport in the rat loop of Henle in vivo. Exp Physiol 86:469-474.
Wetherill, SF; Guarine, MJ; Cox, RW. (1981) Acute renal failure associated with barium chloride poisoning. Ann
Inten Med 95:186-187.
Weast RC; Astle MJ. (1981) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 62
nd
ed. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, Fl
Wones, RG; Stadler, BL; Frohman, LA. (1990) Lack of effect of drinking water barium on cardiovascular risk
factor. Environ Health Perspect 85:355-359.
World Health Organization (WHO). (1990) Environmental health criteria 107: barium. Sponsored by United Nations
Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation, and World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO. (2001) Barium and Barium Compounds. CICAD 33. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Available from: .
Ysart, G; Miller, P; Crews, H; et al. (1999) Dietary exposure estimates of 30 elements from the UK total diet study.
Food Addit Contam 16:391-403.
Zschiesche, W; Schaller, KH; Weltle, D. (1992) Exposure to soluble barium compounds: an interventional study in
arc welders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:13-23.
57
APPENDIX A-1. SUMMARY OF 1998 EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW COMMENTS AND
DISPOSITION
The 1998 Toxicological Review for Barium (U.S. EPA, 1998c) and all individual barium
assessments have undergone both internal peer review performed by scientists within EPA or
other federal agencies and a more formal external peer review performed by scientists chosen by
EPA in accordance with U.S. EPA (1994). The three external peer reviewers (see Authors,
Contributors, and Reviewers) submitted written comments on the overall assessment. A
summary of comments made by the external reviewers and EPA’s response to these comments
follow.
The external peer reviewers offered editorial comments and many minor,
but valuable,
suggestions; these have been incorporated into the text to the extent feasible. Substantive
scientific comments are addressed below. Several reviewers provided citations of papers they
would like to see added to the Toxicological Review; studies that supported the hazard
identification and dose-response assessments have been incorporated into the document.
One reviewer felt that the potential for children to be a high-risk population was
generally ignored.
Response to Comment: As discussed in Section 4.7.1
of this document, there are limited
data with which to assess whether children are likely to be a sensitive subpopulation.
The available data suggest that there are potential toxicokinetic differences between
adults and young children; however, there are no data to assess potential age-related
toxicity differences.
Comment: One reviewer suggested increasing the uncertainty factor for the RfD from 3 to 10.
He felt that the increased uncertainty factor was justified to protect against potential effects in
children and uncertainty as to the role of dietary variability. The other two external peer
reviewers felt that the uncertainty factor of 3 was appropriate.
: EPA concludes that the uncertainty factor of 3 should be
retained. The uncertainty factor of 3 was used to account for some data base deficiencies
and a potential difference between adults and children. It is likely that a wide range of
dietary variability, including low calcium intakes, was represented in the Brenniman and
Levy (1984) study population of more than 2000 adults. The residents, aged 18-75+
A-1