C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
113
4
Specific information must be shared with groundwater agencies. The
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)
allows
local jurisdictions to customize groundwater plans based on their specific needs. Discussion of water
should analyze water needs
for domestic, agricultural, ecological and industrial uses, and provide for the conservation of water supplies and protection
of aquatic ecosystems as a beneficial use. Land use choices affect water demand long into the future. When evaluating the
feasibility of possible land use patterns, cities and counties should work with water agencies to consider projected available water
resources under a changing climate, and water conservation measures to ensure a sustainable water supply, rather than simply
Natural Resources as Nature’s Benefits; Greenprints and Conservation
A conservation element can include a quantification and explanation of the benefits that the community obtains from
their surrounding ecosystems. Communities’ well-being depends on the benefits that nature provides for free, every day and
everywhere. For example, we depend on ecosystems such as forests and wetlands, for clean water, fertile soils, food, fuel, storm
protection, minerals and flood control.
These benefits, often called “nature’s benefits,” are commonly categorized into four broad categories.
Provisioning benefits
include the production of food and water, while regulating benefits include the control of climate and disease. Supporting
benefits include nutrient cycles and crop pollination. Lastly, cultural benefits include spiritual and recreational opportunities.
To help inform planning decisions, these benefits can be
assigned economic values
, values that measure other non-monetary
benefits to the community, and values that demonstrate the benefits gained when various natural resources mutually reinforce
each other. These benefits and services can be expressed in a “Greenprint,” such as those developed under the
federal sustainable
communities
initiative
, which can help local governments to analyze and plan for these cross-cutting and community-supporting
benefits in their general plan updates and apply innovative and successful strategies for implementation. For more information
on ecosystem services see
http://www.fs.fed.us/ecosystemservices/
http://www.nature.org/science-in-action/ecosystem-services.xml
deferring to water agencies to meet any projected demand. Jurisdictions may want to form joint committees to synchronize
planning timelines between water and land use, coordinate with local
integrated regional water management plans (IRWM)
,
consider using watersheds as their planning area, or explicitly acknowledge their relationship to an existing watershed. Smaller
urban development footprints (i.e. concentrated development) protect and enhance the watershed, improving water supply, flood
management, and water quality. The
California
Water Plan
currently projects diminishing reliability in water supplies of 3-5%
in the next twenty years. Existing water sources may also become less reliable due to climate change and development. The
conservation element is inextricably connected to the
land use
and
open space
elements.
The decision in
County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water Agency
helps to further clarify the relationship between
availability of water and development: “in determining whether and where to permit development, a county must necessarily
C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
114
4
consider the availability of consumptive water supplies. If additional water supplies are available, growth and development
are feasible. Conversely, if that water is not available, growth is necessarily limited.” The Government
Code and Water Code
additionally require water supply districts to prepare water supply verifications and assessments for some large-scale projects,
including subdivisions of over 500 dwelling units (
Gov. Code § 66473.7)
). When amending its general plan, a jurisdiction
shall coordinate with any public water agency pursuant to
Government Code section 65352.5
to analyze available water supply
information and identify adequate water for anticipated growth. Additionally,
Urban Water Management Plans
, where required,
rely on build-out data from general plans, highlighting the importance of consistency and communication between agencies.
For specific projects, the water supply verification comes at the final approval
stage of project development, and a subdivision
cannot be approved if adequate water supplies do not exist at this stage. (
Gov. Code § 66473.7(b)(1)
).
National Flood Insurance Rate Program maps
,
dam failure inundation maps
, information available from the
California
Department of Water Resources
,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
and historical
data on flooding all provide useful information for identifying flood-prone areas for floodwater management purposes. Aspects
of floodwater management must also be addressed in the
land use
and
safety
elements, and local
governments may want to
consider combining these discussions in their general plans (
Gov. Code §§ 65302(a), 65302(g)(2)
). The Government Code also
provides further requirements on development in flood hazard zones as defined in
Government Code section 65007(d)
in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley (
Gov. Code §§ 65302.9
,
65860.1
,
65865.5
,
65962
,
66474.5
).
S A M P L E O F O P R - R E C O M M E N D E D D A T A F O R C O N S I D E R A T I O N I N A N A L Y S I S O F T H I S E L E M E N T
Intent of Analysis
Recommended Data
Assessment of existing and projected demands on water supply sources Inventory of quality and boundaries of watershed, aquifer recharge
areas, groundwater basins, and other water resources
Risk assessment for flooding
Flood maps
Examination of ability to align policies, zoning, and goals regarding
housing built
Number of housing
units allocated through SCS
Assessment of potential housing developments
Documented interest by developers and landowners
Forests
Requirement Description:
The conservation element must provide for the management, enhancement, protection, and potential modification of the
current agroforestry practices for wildlife protection, watershed protection, recreation, and aesthetic purposes. Possible topics to
address include protection of oak
woodlands and urban forests, analysis of possible future development within resource areas,
the need for suitable and predicted-to-be suitable habitat management for the mitigation of climate change, precipitation
retention for watershed management and attenuation of flood waters, aesthetics, cultural use, commercial value of forests, and
protection of timber resources subject to timberland production zoning (
Gov. Code § 51104(e-g)
;
51110-51119.5
)
California’s forests are valuable assets and their conservation provides many benefits to the natural and built environments.
As trees grow and develop, their value to the forest ecosystem and climate change mitigation increases. Older trees sequester
significantly more carbon than young trees and are necessary for nutrient cycles for nitrogen and phosphorous. These nutrients