C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
161
4
(v)
Local, state, and federal agencies with responsibility
for fire protection, including special districts and local
office of emergency services.
(B) A set of goals, policies, and objectives based on the information identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) for
the protection of the community from the unreasonable risk of wildfire.
(C) A set of feasible implementation measures designed to carry out the goals, policies, and objectives based on the
information identified pursuant to subparagraph (B) including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(i)
Avoiding or minimizing the wildfire hazards associated with new uses of land.
(ii) Locating, when feasible, new essential public facilities outside of high fire risk areas, including,
but not limited
to, hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters, emergency command centers, and emergency
communications facilities, or identifying construction methods or other methods to minimize damage if these
facilities are located in a state responsibility area or very high fire hazard severity zone.
(iii) Designing adequate infrastructure if a new development is located in a state responsibility area or in a very high
fire hazard severity zone, including safe access for emergency response vehicles, visible street signs, and water
supplies for structural fire suppression.
(iv) Working cooperatively with public agencies with responsibility for fire protection.
(D) If a city or county has adopted a fire safety plan or document
separate from the general plan, an attachment of, or
reference to, a city or county’s adopted fire safety plan or document that fulfills commensurate goals and objectives and
contains information required pursuant to this paragraph.
In response, many local governments are choosing to strengthen water management and drought prevention efforts by adding
a separate water element to their general plan, but drought preparedness strategies could also be incorporated into the safety
element as part of fire or flood hazard mitigation tactics. Structural and nonstructural flood management methods that enhance
water storage and groundwater recharge work to mitigate drought impacts, and promoting greater water efficiency through
land use and development policies can minimize capital damage from droughts as well as fires. As opposed to solely relying on
local hazard mitigation plans, existing urban and agricultural
water management plans, or expecting state or federal disaster
aid after severe drought impacts, local governments can use the general plan as a tool to encourage water conservation policies,
drought-tolerant parks and landscaping, water audits, and dual plumbing with recycled water. For more resources on how local
governments can plan for droughts, see:
•
California’s 2010 State Drought Contingency Plan
•
OPR’s 2014 Local Government Drought Toolkit
•
2011 Climate Change Handbook for Regional Water Planning
C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
162
4
•
California’s 2009 State Water Plan for integrated water management
•
Local Government Commission’s guidebook for
regional water sustainability
Aside from local fire plans and hazard mitigation plans, the general plan’s safety element can provide a framework for inserting
fire protection and prevention policy requirements in zoning, subdivision, and strategic fire defense ordinances. To safeguard
the increasing “wildland-urban interface, ” communities with
State Responsibility Area (SRA)
or
Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone Local Responsibility Area (LRA)
must update their safety element following the next revision of the housing element on
or after January 1, 2014 to address the risk of wildland fire. In order to develop viable plans for fire protection, wildfire risk
reduction,
evacuation needs, and consistency between general plan elements and other local plans, the safety element shall
incorporate information such as fire hazard maps and assessments, implementation goals and actionable policies, as well as
any appropriate references to local fire safety plans.
As a guiding resource, OPR’s
Fire Hazard Planning Technical Advisory
includes a detailed discussion about how to incorporate
and comply with the fire hazard requirements in a general plan.
Other Considerations
Additional Requirements
The safety element must also address additional, interrelated considerations in the context of fire and geological hazards.
These
include evacuation routes, military installations, peakload water supply requirements, and minimum road widths and
clearances around structures. The relationships between these considerations interplays throughout the required contents of the
safety element, and should be analyzed in the context of safety and disasters, including climate change, drought, fire, flood, or
seismic activity, as appropriate.
C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
163
4
OPR Recommended Policies
These policies are an example of recommended policies adopted by varying jurisdictions, to be modified and used as appropriate.
A full list of recommended policies for flood risk, fire risk, and climate change can be found in
the guidance and technical
advisories referenced throughout this chapter.
Sample Policy
Example of Application
Relationship to Other Elements
[City/county] shall promote the strengthening of planned
utilities, the retrofit and rehabilitation of existing weak
structures and lifeline utilities, and the relocation or
strengthening of certain critical facilities to increase public
safety and minimize potential damage from seismic and
geologic hazards.
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Circulation, climate change, equitable and resilient
communities
[City/county] shall site critical public facilities—including
hospital
and healthcare facilities, emergency shelters,
police and fire stations, and emergency communications
facilities—outside of the tsunami evacuation zone and
100-year flood plains.
Pacifica
Environmental justice, equitable and resilient communi-
ties, healthy communities
[City/county] shall identify and establish specific travel
routes for the transport of hazardous materials and
wastes, with key considerations being capacity to safely
accommodate additional truck traffic, avoidance of
residential areas, and use of
interstate or state divided
highways as preferred routes.
City of Rialto
Circulation, environmental justice, noise, healthy com-
munities
[City/county] shall work to achieve consistency between
general plan land use and related policies and the Airport
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, as is appropriate for the
community. Measures may include restrictions on permit-
ted land uses and development criteria, including height
restrictions.
Redwood City
Land use, circulation