126
Amnesty International Report 2017/18
In June, the National Intelligence Law was
adopted and entered into force. These laws
were part of a national security legal
architecture introduced in 2014 − which also
included the Anti-espionage Law, Criminal
Law Amendment (9), National Security Law,
Anti-terrorism Law and Cyber Security Law −
and presented serious threats to the
protection of human rights. The National
Intelligence Law used similarly vague and
overbroad concepts of national security, and
granted effectively unchecked powers to
national intelligence institutions with unclear
roles and responsibilities. All lacked
safeguards to protect against arbitrary
detention and to protect the right to privacy,
freedom of expression and other human
rights.
1
The draft Supervision Law, which opened
for consultation in November, would, if
enacted as is, legalize a new form of arbitrary
detention, named liuzhi, and create an
extrajudicial system with far-reaching powers
with significant potential to infringe human
rights.
2
The authorities continued to use “residential
surveillance in a designated location”, a form
of secret incommunicado detention that
allowed the police to hold individuals for up
to six months outside the formal detention
system, without access to legal counsel of
their choice, their families or others, and
placed suspects at risk of torture and other
ill-treatment. This form of detention was used
to curb the activities of human rights
defenders, including lawyers, activists and
religious practitioners.
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS
On 13 July, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu
Xiaobo died in custody from liver cancer. The
authorities had refused a request from Liu
Xiaobo and his family that he travel abroad to
receive medical treatment.
3
At the end of the
year, his wife Liu Xia remained under
surveillance and illegal “house arrest” which
had continued since Liu Xiaobo was awarded
the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010. At least 10
activists were detained for holding memorials
for him.
In November, writer and government critic
Yang Tongyan, who had spent nearly half his
life in detention, died shortly after his release
on medical parole.
Among the nearly 250 targeted individuals
who were questioned or detained by state
security agents following the unprecedented
government crackdown on human rights
lawyers and other activists that started in July
2015, nine were convicted of “subverting
state power”, “inciting subversion of state
power” or “picking quarrels and provoking
trouble”. Three people were given suspended
sentences and one “exempted from criminal
punishment” while remaining under
surveillance and five remained imprisoned. In
April, Beijing lawyer Li Heping, detained
since the beginning of the crackdown, was
given a three-year suspended prison
sentence for “subverting state power”. He
claimed that he was tortured during pre-trial
detention, including being force-fed
medicine. Yin Xu’an was sentenced in May to
three and a half years’ imprisonment. Wang
Fang was sentenced in July to three years’
imprisonment. Beijing lawyer Jiang Tianyong,
who went missing in November 2016 and
“confessed” at a trial in August to fabricating
the torture account of lawyer Xie Yang by
Chinese police and attending overseas
workshops to discuss changing China’s
political system, was sentenced in November
to two years’ imprisonment for “inciting
subversion of state power”. Hu Shigen and
Zhou Shifeng, convicted in 2016, remained
imprisoned. Beijing human rights lawyer
Wang Quanzhang, held in incommunicado
detention since the beginning of the
crackdown, was still awaiting trial at the end
of the year, charged with “subverting state
power”. In January, an interview transcript
with Xie Yang was published in which he said
he faced torture and other ill-treatment
during detention. Xie Yang was released on
bail without a verdict in May after his trial. On
26 December, the court announced his
conviction on the charge of “inciting
subversion of state power” but ruled that he
was “exempt from criminal punishment”. He
remained under surveillance.
Amnesty International Report 2017/18
127
In July, Beijing lawyer Wang Yu, whose
detention on 9 July 2015 marked the
beginning of the crackdown, wrote in an
article published online that she was ill-
treated during detention. She was released
on bail in mid-2016 but remained under
close surveillance. Lawyers Li Shuyun, Ren
Quanniu and Li Chunfu, and activist Gou
Hongguo, reported that they were drugged
during detention.
4
In addition to the 250 targeted individuals,
activist Wu Gan, who worked in a law firm
later targeted by the authorities in the
crackdown, was tried in August in a closed
hearing for “subverting state power” after
nearly 27 months’ pre-trial detention. On 26
December, he was sentenced to eight years’
imprisonment.
In March, Guangdong activist Su Changlan
was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment
for “inciting subversion of state power” for
her online criticism of the Chinese
Communist Party and the Chinese socialist
system. She was detained in 2014 after
expressing support for Hong Kong’s 2014
pro-democracy Umbrella Movement. She
was released in October after serving the full
sentence but with health concerns
aggravated by poor conditions in detention.
On 19 March, Lee Ming-Cheh, manager of a
Taiwan NGO, was detained by state security
officers when he entered mainland China
from Macao. In September, he was tried in
Hunan Province for “subverting state power”
and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in
November.
5
At least 11 activists were detained in June
for commemorating the 1989 Tiananmen
crackdown; most were accused of “picking
quarrels and provoking trouble”. Li Xiaoling
and Shi Tingfu remained in detention, and
Ding Yajun was sentenced to three years’
imprisonment in September.
In August, lawyer Gao Zhisheng went
missing from an isolated village in Shaanxi
province, where he had lived under tight
surveillance since his release from prison in
2014. The family later learned he was in
authorities’ custody but his location and
condition remained unknown.
Lawyer Li Yuhan was detained in October
and claimed she was tortured and ill-treated
during detention.
WORKERS’ RIGHTS
In May, labour activists Hua Haifeng, Li Zhao
and Su Heng were detained in Jiangxi
province while investigating work conditions
at Huajian shoe factories. The activists were
released on bail in June but remained under
close surveillance.
In July, a Guangzhou court sentenced
labour activist Liu Shaoming to four and a
half years’ imprisonment for publishing his
reflections about joining the pro-democracy
movement and becoming a member of
China’s first independent trade union in
1989, and experiences during the 1989
Tiananmen crackdown.
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION – INTERNET
Thousands of websites and social media
services remained blocked, including
Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. On 1 June,
the Cybersecurity Law came into effect,
making it obligatory for internet companies
operating in China to censor users’ content.
In August, the Cyberspace Administration of
China and the Guangdong Provincial
Cyberspace Administration launched an
investigation into internet service providers
Tencent’s WeChat, Sina Weibo and Baidu’s
Tieba because their platforms contained user
accounts which “spread information that
endangers national security, public security
and social order, including violence and
terror, false information and rumours and
pornography”. In September, China’s
dominant messaging service WeChat
introduced new terms of service to collect a
wide range of personal information, and
made data on its over 900 million users
available to the government.
Huang Qi, co-founder of 64tianwang.com, a
website that reports on and documents
protests in China, was accused of “leaking
state secrets”. He was allowed to meet his
lawyer only eight months after he was
detained and claimed that he was ill-treated
in detention. At the end of 2017, 10