Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, 38(3)



Yüklə 297,1 Kb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə14/17
tarix22.12.2023
ölçüsü297,1 Kb.
#154187
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17
[8] Peters et al 38-3

. European Journal of 
Teacher Education
, 1–19. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
 
Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator 
technology competencies. 
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education

25
(4), 413–448. 
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/181966/
 
From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence—Between values, knowledge and skills. 
Higher 
Education Studies
,
 7
(2), 43. 
https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43
 
Garzón Artacho, Esther, Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martín, J. L., Marín Marín, J. A., & Gómez García, G. 
(2020). Teacher training in lifelong learning-the importance of digital competence in the 
encouragement of teaching innovation. 
Sustainability

12
(7), 2852. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852
 
Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019). Digital competence of educators (DigCompedu): Development and 
evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers’ digital competence. In H. C. Lane, S. Zvacek, 
& J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.),
 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported 
Education 
(vol. 1, pp. 541–548). SCITEPRESS. 
https://www.scitepress.org/PublicationsDetail.aspx?ID=1ClTvMhd8n4=&t=1
 
Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2018). E-teaching in higher education: An essential prerequisite for e-learning. 
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

7
(2), 93–97. 
https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.298
 


Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, 38(3). 
135 
Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Where is the “theory” within the field of 
educational technology research? 
British Journal of Educational Technology

50
(3), 956–971. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12770
 
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence: An emergent 
boundary concept for policy and educational research. 
Education and Information Technologies
,
 21

655–679. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4 
Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Educativa y Formacion del Profesorado. (2017). 
Marco Común de 
Competencia Digital Docente 2017
[Common framework for teacher digital competence 2017]. 
Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport. 
http://educalab.es/documents/10180/12809/Marco+competencia+digital+docente+2017/afb07987-
1ad6-4b2d-bdc8-58e9faeeccea
 
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). 
Checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses

https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2021-
10/Checklist_for_Systematic_Reviews_and_Research_Syntheses.docx
  
Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators' digital competence. 
Scandinavian Journal of Educational 
Research
,
 58
(3), 269–280. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.726273
 
McGarr, O., Mifsud, L., & Colomer Rubio, J. C. (2021). Digital competence in teacher education: 
Comparing national policies in Norway, Ireland and Spain. 
Learning, Media and Technology
, 1–15. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1913182
 
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for 
teacher knowledge. 
Teachers College Record, 108
(6), 1017–1054. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
9620.2006.00684.x
 
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., 
Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D'Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. 
J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic 
reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. 

Yüklə 297,1 Kb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə