Apr. 2015
041
WWW.BOAOREVIEW.COM
GDP
E
ach of the world’s major economies –
the Euro-
pean, the American and the Chinese economy –
is slipping into its own “new normal” and each
one is unhappy in its own way. These economies offer
an escape from poverty. But Europe is seriously lacking
in self-support. America is woefully lacking in prosper-
ity. And all of them are, to varying degrees, lacking in
human flourishing.
The European Union
Measured
by its gross domestic product, the econ-
omy of the European Union is very large – larger than
American and Chinese economies. Its decline acts to
reduce wages in the rest of the world. More important,
Europe was – for more than a century – a major source
of new products and a key source of advances in science
and the arts. We will all be the poorer if Europe goes on
failing to recapture its brilliant past.
In the past two decades
it has become apparent that
the European economy is in very poor condition. It is
common ground that, now, in 2015, the aggregate out-
put – the Gross Domestic Product – of the European
economy is far below the previous trend path – below
the trend line we might fit to historical data up to 1995.
Yet European economists believe with few exceptions
that nothing is radically wrong with the European
economy – nothing that would require structural
rehabilitation extending to the entrepreneurial heart
and innovative brain of the economy. Nevertheless it is
interesting
to note what these economists, observing
that the economy is not well, are diagnosing and
Europe,
America
and China
Have the Same
Economic Problem
By
Edmund Phelps
Each of the world’s major economies
– the EU, America and China – are
slipping into its own “new normal”.
While they offer an escape from
poverty, all of them are, to varying
degrees, lacking in human flourishing.
P001-118-BAGC3-R5.indd 41
15-3-5 下午10:48
042
Apr. 2015
Cover
prescribing
. And we may
learn something that may
sometime be useful in our own economies.
Many economists speak of a loss of competitiveness,
particularly in the south of Europe – in Greece, Italy
and Spain. They imply that output is down, relative
to trend, largely because wages got out of line with
productivity, forcing firms to cut back – a case of wage
misalignment. Taking this perspective, German econ-
omists argue for wage deflation in the affected econo-
mies; the Keynesian economists argue for monetary
stimulus in order to raise prices (relative to wages)
and state investment in infrastructure to create some
more jobs.
The background to the
adoption of this perspective
is the sharp productivity slowdown that hit Germa-
ny, Italy, France and Spain around 1998; and Britain
around 2005. Although wage rates have remained in
line with productivity in Germany and Britain – and
employment has held up pretty well there – wages
got out of line with productivity in Italy, Spain and
Greece during the boom years of the late 1990s, and
in the early 2000s wages got ahead in France and
farther ahead in Greece. These wage misalignments
may very well explain the drop in the employment of
men – relative to the population of men – from the
period 1990-1995 to the period 2010-2012
in Italy and
Spain as well as Greece. But, in Italy, France and most
conspicuously in Germany, we see a bigger drop of
the employment-to-population ratio from the 1970s
(in Germany and Italy) or the 1980s (in France) to the
1990s. Were those drops in employment also the result
of wage misalignments? Is every fall of employment a
market failure? Of course not! No one would believe it
is mainly an accumulation of such misalignments that
has brought declining employment and thus
output
not keeping up with its trend path. There must be some
other forces at work.
Economists have staged a fierce debate over two
warring schools. In the classical view, which I myself
have expounded (in the
Financial Times
), it is to some
extent a contraction of labor supply that has led to a
decline of employment – and thus to lagging output.
And it is largely outbreaks of fiscal profligacy in Eu-
rope, most pronounced from the mid-1990s
to the mid-
2000s, that led to that contraction: In Greece, Italy
and, to a lesser extent, France, there were tax cuts and
spending increases, which added to households’ esti-
mates of their private wealth in relation to their wage
income, and there were expansions of entitlements to
future benefits, which added to people’s estimates of
their social wealth relative to their income. (The Eu-
ropean Union also donated lavish “structural funds”
to Spain and Greece, which further increased people’s
wealth relative to their productivity.
Brussels made
some of them rich. Even public sector wage rates rose
to the sky in Greece.) Bloated with wealth, many em-
ployees must have lost some of their incentives to per-
form well, so companies’ costs of production went up;
P01-96-BAGC3-R5.indd 42
15-3-5 下午10:36