060
Apr. 2015
global university must provide state of the art facilities
for its faculty. I would argue that it should be independ-
ent and have excellent leadership and governance. That
leadership must promote the international agenda and
have a vision that encompasses it.
Innovative global research
The pursuit of innovative global research is the abso-
lutely prime characteristic and without it, a university
cannot claim to be global. What is clear is that global
research is not just more “connectivity”; i.e. putting
people together in different ways, maximizing effective
use of logistics, video seminar series and summer insti-
tutes. All these are good in themselves and may lead to
new ways of thinking and collaborating but they are not
“global” characteristics. The global part of this comes in
the marshalling of these universities’ huge intellectual
and logistical resources to address global problems and
questions in new ways.
The size of the endeavor, the size and centrality of
the questions and the multiplicity of partners are the
crucial factors here. This means asking academic staff
to think in new ways, asking them look out of the rut
and see different horizons. This is not intellectually
easy; most of us are much more comfortable with
reductionist science. It is fiercely difficult to identify,
never mind pose, the central integrating question. The
“connectivity” benefits that I have described above will
be an essential mechanism for identifying and posing
these questions but it is essential that “connectivity”
should be identified for that purpose and not just seen
as a good in its own right.
An international curriculum and global distribution of
education
Our students will become global citizens in a way
that people of my generation would never have consid-
ered. The curricula we teach should reflect that. I don’t
mean that we should be teaching internationalization
as a module, more that we should be reviewing our ba-
sic curricula in all our subjects and asking whether they
are structured and taught in a way which reflects the
global nature of our world.
A global university will have global distribution of its
educational material and programs. Up until recently,
this meant investment in platforms and new forms of
pedagogy that proved to be expensive and didn’t neces-
sarily succeed. However the arrival of MOOCs (Massive
Open Online Courses) and their support by established
distance learning providers has changed all that. I chair
the Partner Advisory Board for FutureLearn which
is the company spun out of the Open University to
Public Policy
P001-118-BAGC3-R5D1b2a1B3.indd 60
15-3-7 下午12:34
Apr. 2015
061
WWW.BOAOREVIEW.COM
support MOOCs. Their impact is enormous. Future-
Learn is moving towards 1 million registrations on its
MOOCs. Its largest registration is over 140,000.
Not only are MOOCs giving universities the oppor-
tunity to advertise excellence but they are also, in the
hands of the correct supporting company, a low risk
way for a university to enter the global distributed
learning sector. This will certainly be one way of mod-
ern pedagogy, so a global university should be explor-
ing it.
International student and staff
It is inconceivable that a global university won’t have
a substantial number of international students from
diverse backgrounds. At Bristol, 18% of our students
come from overseas and if you add in EU students, that
reaches nearly 30% from over 100 counties. I would
argue that represents a truly global student body
A global university will have faculty from all over
the world, not including returning expatriates. The free
movement of labor in the EU has really helped UK uni-
versities to attract talented faculty from the European
continent.
Impacting global issues and policy formulation
Academic staff of a global university will advise glob-
al institutions on policy formulation in global issues,
for example advising the United Nations about solu-
tions to global poverty or WHO about AIDS and its
management in the Third World.
Close interactions with global business
Chief executives and senior managers in global
businesses will naturally interact and collaborate with
organizations that they consider to be punching at the
same weight as they are.
Visitors
A colleague recently said that he had worked at
three universities and what differentiated one from
the others was the frequency and diversity of other ac-
ademics from outside the UK visiting the department
and the university. In other words, you have what oth-
er people in the globe want to see.
Some may agree with these definitions and others
disagree but they are a starting point for discussion.
As I wrote earlier, much remains unchanged over 12
years. One final thought. There are now four major
global league tables. Only 49 universities are in the
top 100 in all four and only 70 in three out of the four.
Are those 49 or even those 70 the only truly global
universities?
P001-118-BAGC3-R5D1b2a1B3.indd 61
15-3-7 下午12:34
062
Apr. 2015
F
or decades, Mexico has been the single great-
est source of immigrants to the United States.
Indeed, of the approximately 40 million for-
eign-born in the United States, nearly three in ten are
from Mexico.
While a great deal of attention has been given to this
population, there has been less attention to those who
return to Mexico. Such populations are considerable.
Surveys of older persons in both countries suggest
that, among persons 50 or older, there are about as
many immigrants in the United States who were born
in Mexico as there are return migrants in Mexico who
spent at least part of their lives in the United States.
Such numbers have been growing. From the late
1990s to the latter years of last decade, for example,
the Pew Research Center found that the number of mi-
grants from the United States to Mexico increased from
670,000 to 1.39 million, while the number of migrants
from Mexico to the United States decreased from 2.94
million to 1.37 million.
This return migration has several implications for
Mexico and the United States, particularly for older
populations in these two nations that lack a bilateral
agreement for the portability and totalization of so-
cial-security contributions between them. Without
such an agreement, Mexican workers must contribute
at least ten years to the U.S. Social Security Adminis-
tration, or at least 25 years to a Mexican social-security
institute (through work in the formal sector rather than
the larger informal sector), to qualify for retirement
benefits. Workers may not combine years of contribu-
tions to qualify.
Research we have conducted, using surveys of the
populations at least 50 years of age in both countries,
helps illustrate several emerging policy challenges, in-
cluding those related to income security at older ages.
More than three in four return migrants are male,
compared to 49 percent of immigrants remaining in
the United States and 42 percent of older Mexicans
who never migrated. About two in three, or more, are
Public Policy
Going Back to Mexico:
Access to Healthcare
and Income Security
in Old Age
By Emma Aguila
P001-118-BAGC3-R5D1b2a1B3.indd 62
15-3-7 下午12:34
Dostları ilə paylaş: |