Contemporary Problems of Social Work Современные проблемы социальной работы academic journal

156
CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL WORK
regulatory organizations, and the available legal practice on this issue, shows the impossibility 
to regulate SRO on the basis of the general rules of law about collective subjects of law, and 
requires the allocation of self-regulatory organizations in particular as an independent subject 
of law.
References
1.  Basov A.V. (2008) Self-Regulatory Organizations As the Subjects of Entrepreneur Ship Law: 
candidate dissertation. Moscow. 2008. P. 96.
2.  Black J. (1996) Constitutionalising Self-regulation // Modern Law Review. January.
3.  Chris Jay Hoofnagle. (2005) Privacy Self Regulation: A Decade of Disappointment. URL: 
http://www.epic.org/reports/decadedisappoint.html.
4.  Denisov S.A. (2008) Self-Regulation or Self-Organisation? // Civil law of modern Russia. 
Moscow Statute.
5.  Federal Law “On self-regulating organizations” of the 1
st
 of January, 2007. No. 315 (edited of the 
24
th
 of November, 2014) // Collection of laws of the Russian Federation. 2007. No. 49. Vol. 6076.
6.  Federal Law “On advertising” of the 13
th
 of March, 2006, No. 38 (edited of the 8
th
 of March, 
2015) // Collection of laws of the Russian Federation, 2006. No. 12. Vol. 1232.
7.  Federal Law “On insolvency (bankruptcy)” of the 26
th
 of October, 2002, No. 127 (edited of the 
29th of December, 2014) // Collection of laws of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 43. Vol. 4190.
8.  Federal Law “On appraisal activity in the Russian Federation” of the 29
th
 of July, 1998, No. 
135 (edited of the 8
th
 of March, 2015) // Collection of laws of the Russian Federation. 1998. 
No. 31. Vol. 3813.
9.  Federal Law “On nonprofit organizations” // Collection of laws of the Russian Federation. 
1996. No. 3. Vol. 145.
10.  Guryleva, A.A. (2015) Actual problems of legal regulation of religious education in Russia, 
Contemporary Problems of Social Work.Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 45–49.
11.  Khohlov E.S. To the Question of Legal Personality of the Self-Regulatory Organization // 
Legislation. 2008. Vol. 4. P. 25.
12.  Kozlova N.V. (2003) The Notion and the Essence of Legal Entity. Essay on the History and 
Theory: manual. Moscow: Statute.
13.  Nowak E., Rott R., Till G. Mahr. (2004) Does Self-Regulation Work in a Civil Law Country? 
An Empirical Analysis of the Declaration of Conformity to the German Corporate Covernance 
Code. URL: http://www.nccr-finrisk.uzh.ch/media/pdf/Nowak.pdf.
14. Paton Paul (2008) Self-Regulation Takes a Beating Abroad Is Canada Different? // The 
Lawyers Weekly, Ottawa, Canada. Vol. 28. No. 24. URL: http://www. lawyers weekly. ca/index.
php?section=article& articleid=732.
15.  Sitdikova L.B. The Role of Self-Regulatory Organizations in the Consultancy Services Quality 
Provision // Legal World. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 71–73.
16.  Sitdikova L.B. (2009) Legal Regulation of Relations in the Sphere of Provision of Information 
and Consultancy Services in the Russian Federation. Thesis abstract.
17.  Tretyakova S.B. Self-Regulatory Organization – Special Subject of Law // Administrative and 
Municipal Law. 2013. Vol. 5. P. 417.
18.  Yastrebov O.A. (2009) Non-Profit Organizations As Subjects of Public Law. Moscow: RUDN. 
P. 20.
19.  Volkov A.M. (2010) Legal Entities of the Public Law in Concept of the Development of the 
Legislation on Legal Entities // The Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of 
Peoples: a series of legal science. Vol. 1. P. 33.
20.  Zurina I.G. (2009) Is It Possible to Recognize Self-Regulatory Organization As a Legal Entity 
of the Public Law? // Advocate. Vol. 6. P. 105.
21.  Zurina I.G. (2009) Some Questions of Definition of the Organizational-Legal Form of the Self-
Regulating Organizations // Business in Law: Economical-Legal Journal. No. 1. P. 264–266.
REFERENCE TO ARTICLE
 
Sitdikova, L.B., &. Shilovskaya, A.L. (2016) The Role of Self-Regulatory Organizations (SRO) 
in Civil Legal Relations, Contemporary Problems of Social Work. Vol. 2. No. 1 (5). P. 150–156. 
DOI: 10.17922/2412-5466-2016-2-1-150-156 (International bibliographic description).

---

157
Sorikhina V.P.,
postgraduate student, Russian State Social University, Moscow.
E-mail: [e-mail]
Fomina S.N.,
doctor of pedagogical sciences, senior of the Department of family, gender 
policy and youth study, Russian State Social University, Moscow.
E-mail: [e-mail]
Author ID (Scopus): 56719572200
 UDC 
378.14
 DOI: 
10.17922/2412-5466-2016-2-1-157-162
The Essential Characteristic
 of Research Activity of Bachelors on Direction 
“Organization of Work with Youth”
Receiving date:
25.01.2016
Preprint date:
25.02.2016
Taking to print date:
28.03.2016
Annotation: this article describes characteristics of scientific research activity of students of the specialty 
“Organization of work with youth”. Reviewed by FSES of HE preparing 39.03.03 “Organization of work with 
young people (undergraduate level)”. The article describes in detail the tasks to be solved by research. Lists 
the main types of research activity of students of specialty “Organization of work with youth”. To reveal the 
essence of research activity at the University defines the following main concepts: science, study, student, 
University.
Key words: research, science, study, student, University.
At present, the study of problems of higher education adopts a deeper and more systemic in 
nature. We are searching for rational forms and methods of education, expanding the introduction 
in educational process of active technologies of learning. The question involved in research 
activities particularly relevant for students enrolled in higher education institutions [17].
Consider students in higher professional education, namely students of specialty 
“Organization of work with youth”. This specialty was established on a pilot basis in 2003 (in 
accordance with the order of the Ministry of education of the Russian Federation dated 
12.08.2003 No. 3310), and was referred to the interdisciplinary group of specialties. The 
implementation of this educational program was carried out in accordance with the Provisional 
requirements for the minimum content. Professional training in youth work began in more 
EDUCATION

---