B A B A G . J A L L O W
20
grandiose titles such as “Supreme Guide of the Revolution,”
“The Terror of International Imperialism, Colonialism and
Neo-Colonialism,” “The Doctor of Revolutionary Sciences,”
and “The Great Son of Africa” and proved to be one of the most
brutal rulers in postcolonial African history (Jallow 2011).
In chapter 4 , Maavi Norman examines the impetus behind
these two leaders’ reform efforts. Citing a number of contingent
factors in each country, Liberia and Ghana, Norman concludes
that Tolbert was a “Reformer by Choice,” while Rawlings was
a “Reformer by Expediency.” He highlights the advantages
and potential dangers of reform in postcolonial Africa and
concludes that domestic political protests, international politi-
cal conditionality, and other structural factors often drive the
reform efforts of African leaders. Threat perception and a sense
of security each in their own ways are motivations for reform or
the lack of it by African leaders.
Leadership in Postcolonial Africa: The Bright Side
But as is demonstrated by six of the remaining chapters in
this book, it is not all doom and gloom in the field of African
leadership studies or the theater of postcolonial African leader-
ship. There have been good leaders in Africa, some political,
most civic, whose examples are worthy of emulation by future
African leaders. It is noteworthy that, increasingly, in Africa as
in many other parts of the world, dictatorship is a dying breed.
Dictatorship of the kind represented by Nkrumah’s PDA,
Mobutu’s
authenticité , or Bokassa’s self-coronation is hardly
imaginable in today’s Africa, thanks partly to the increasing
integration and mutual visibility of the global socioeconomic
and political community.
In chapter 5 , Jay Carney shows how in the former Belgian
Congo (then Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo)
state failure created a leadership vacuum that was ably filled by
the Catholic Church and one Catholic priest who became so
influential as to effectively replace state authority in his home
province. Through his case study of Bishop Nicholas Djomo,
Carney highlights the leadership roles of Congolese church
leaders as local pastors, sources of popular inspiration, political
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
L E A D E R S H I P I N P O S T C O L O N I A L A F R I C A
21
brokers, agents of social reconstruction, embodiments of the
teachings of Vatican II, and often martyrs of resistance to an
oppressive political regime.
In chapter 6 , Faith Ngunjiri tells the inspiring story of the
first African woman to win the Nobel Prize for peace. Ngunjiri
argues that Wangari Maathai’s “pioneering” and “radical” lead-
ership style—demonstrated in her work as an academic at the
University of Nairobi, as founder of the Greenbelt Movement,
and with the National Council of Women of Kenya—holds use-
ful lessons “that would resonate with established and emerging
leaders irrespective of their social locations.” She argues that
the life and works of Professor Maathai need to be widely stud-
ied and her leadership style emulated both inside and outside
of Africa.
In chapter 7 , Daniel Lieberfeld uses a “personality traits”
approach to examine “why Mandela prioritized and pursued
political reconciliation—defined here as ‘bridging social-political
cleavages from long-standing, violent conflict’—to the degree
he did and the extent to which Mandela’s reconciliation orienta-
tion reflected his personality traits or stemmed from incentives
and pressures in the political environment.” Lieberfeld shows
how upon release from prison and ascension to power in South
Africa, Mandela actively sought to allay Afrikaner fears by very
consciously and publicly assuming and owning the Afrikaner
identity, in order to impress upon the public mind that Afrikaner
and African identities were not at all incompatible. He saluted
“Afrikaner fighters of the Anglo-Boer war, claiming them as an
inspiration for his own post-Sharpeville guerrilla initiative.” He
also embraced his former personal Afrikaner enemies, “Among
the former adversaries whom Mandela invited to dine with him
were Betsie Verwoerd, widow of the most fervent champion of
the White-supremacist system known as apartheid , and Percy
Yutar, the state prosecutor who sought the death penalty against
Mandela at the Rivonia Trial. He even sought to invite to a law-
school class reunion the White student who had objected to sit-
ting next to Mandela because he was Black,” and he “famously
donned the jersey of the Springboks, a formerly Whites-only
team and a touchstone of Afrikaner nationalism, at the 1995
World Rugby Cup” (Lieberfeld, this volume).
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
B A B A G . J A L L O W
22
Lieberfeld’s chapter reveals in illuminating detail how for
Mandela, unlike most other postcolonial African leaders, inde-
pendence or black majority rule did not mark the end of the
liberation struggle. South Africans themselves now needed to
be liberated, from petty animosities, from fear, from political
ignorance, from exclusion, and from an obsessive preoccupation
with skin color and its various prejudices and hostilities. The
effort was institutionalized and registered remarkable success
in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and a long list of
personal reconciliatory efforts Mandela engaged in. He did a
lot to reconcile Afrikaner to African and African to African, the
latter well illustrated by his visit to Natal where he asked African
National Congress (ANC) followers to eschew violence and
embrace reconciliation with the chief of rival Inkhata Freedom
Party of Chief Mangosothu Buthelezi. During the last days of
Apartheid, the Afrikaner state actively sowed discord between
the ANC and Inkhata, leading to a series of bloody clashes in
which many on both sides were killed. Mandela sought to trans-
form this culture of violence into a culture of peace and reconcil-
iation. And he succeeded to a very large extent. Mandela (2010,
326) writes, “It is a grave error for any leader to be oversensitive
in the face of criticism [or] to conduct discussions as if he or she
is a schoolmaster talking to less informed and inexperienced
learners” (quoted in Lieberfeld, this volume). His leadership
offers lessons many African leaders would do well to learn.
In chapter 8 , Robtel Pailey gives a fascinating study of the
leadership styles and legacy of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Africa’s
first female president. Johnson Sirleaf emerges from Pailey’s
chapter as a giant among her male predecessors as leader of
the state of Liberia. Pailey shows how Johnson Sirleaf dramati-
cally reduced the “power distance” (Hofstede) between ruler
and ruled in Liberia, how she empowered the market and some
other women, and how she created a number of micro-level
organizations (Schein 2010), which enables ordinary citizens
to participate in the governance of their own local affairs. At
the same time, argues Pailey, Johnson Sirleaf has reinforced
patriarchal values in Liberian society by, among other things,
preferring men to equally qualified women for positions of
political authority; Johnson Sirleaf stands accused of nepotism
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
Copyrighted material – 9781137478115
Dostları ilə paylaş: |