Ebbinghaus said this because psychology’s questions go back to the ancients


He proposed that although “local signs” contribute to depth perception they are of secondary importance



Yüklə 480 b.
səhifə8/29
tarix24.12.2017
ölçüsü480 b.
#17294
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   29

He proposed that although “local signs” contribute to depth perception they are of secondary importance.

  • The interpretive action of a higher center in the brain is most important.
  • He paralleled Kant’s view of the nature of space.



  • Like Brentano, Stumpf distinguished between phenomena and mental functions.

    • Like Brentano, Stumpf distinguished between phenomena and mental functions.

      • He called sensory images, tones, colors phenomenology.
      • Seeing, hearing, perceiving, thinking are cognitive acts.
    • He studied sounds of musical instruments, melody, tonal fusion and consonance/dissonance of tones.

      • He compared musical and non-musical people.
    • His volume “Tone Psychology” appeared in 1883.

    • This led to prestigious academic appointments.



    In 1903-4, Stumpf challenged the likelihood of a machine that could change photographs of sound waves into sounds.

    • In 1903-4, Stumpf challenged the likelihood of a machine that could change photographs of sound waves into sounds.

    • In 1904 he chaired a commission to investigate the claims of Clever Hans, the horse who could count.

      • His student, Oskar Pfungst, tested Hans when his owner knew the answer and again when he did not.
      • The horse was correct 98% of the time in the first condition but 8% correct in the second condition.
      • He was correct 89% without blinkers, 6% with blinkers.




    His later years were sad.

    • His later years were sad.

    • WWI emptied the university of young men who left to serve in the armed forces.

    • War also disrupted his relationships with colleagues throughout Europe, including British, American and Russians, and caused his work to be overlooked.

    • He was asked to organize psychologists to support the war effort but his heart wasn’t in the task.

    • He retired in 1921, succeeded by Kohler.



    Kulpe studied history but became interested in psychology after hearing Wundt speak at Leipzig.

    • Kulpe studied history but became interested in psychology after hearing Wundt speak at Leipzig.

      • At Wundt’s recommendation he went to Gottingen to study with Muller (Lotze’s successor as chair).
      • Muller followed Fechner’s psychophysics and studied memory (interference) with Ebbinghaus – developing techniques for avoiding experimenter bias & demand.
    • After graduating, he performed experiments challenging assumptions of Wundt & Titchener, although he had warm affection for Wundt.



    Kulpe was influenced by Mach’s positivist philosophical views – all science is based on experience and naturalistic sensory observation.

    • Kulpe was influenced by Mach’s positivist philosophical views – all science is based on experience and naturalistic sensory observation.

      • Mentalistic conceptions and attributions of mental entities are to be avoided.
      • Psych needs objective descriptions of mental events.
      • Kulpe tried to demonstrate that higher mental functions could be studied experimentally.
    • Kulpe’s research provided a foundation for contemporary cognitive psychology.



    Founded by Kulpe & his students.

    • Founded by Kulpe & his students.

    • Subjects were asked about free associations using a method of questioning called “Ausfrage.”

    • Marbe studied “conscious attitudes” of subjects judging weights – doubt, hesitation, searching.

    • Kulpe & Bryan (Clark University) showed that subjects could abstract features of nonsense syllables as an active mental act “apprehension.”

      • Count the “F”s in a sentence.


    Wurzburg psychologists asked how very fast, volitional reaction times could occur without being part of the subject’s mental experience.

    • Wurzburg psychologists asked how very fast, volitional reaction times could occur without being part of the subject’s mental experience.

    • Watts used a more precise Hipp chronoscope & broke reaction times into four parts:

      • (1) preparatory period, (2) stimulus presentation, (3) striving for the response, (4) the response itself.
    • Based on introspection, the thinking takes place during the preparatory period (instructions), establishing a subject “set.”



    Using systematic experimental introspection, Ach found consistent differences between subjects – called decision types.

    • Using systematic experimental introspection, Ach found consistent differences between subjects – called decision types.

      • Binet claimed priority based on descriptions of his kids.
    • Later (1907), Buhler asked questions requiring thoughtful replies, not just “yes/no” answers.

      • Subjects described imageless thought, where answers just came to them.
      • Wundt claimed he was not using introspection correctly.
      • Kulpe & Moore claimed meaning is distinct from image.


    Why are only Ebbinghaus, Weber & Fechner well known?

    • Why are only Ebbinghaus, Weber & Fechner well known?

      • WWI disrupted others’ work and international contacts.
      • WWII destroyed the German universities.
      • Politics prevented communication between German and American psychologists.

    • Yüklə 480 b.

      Dostları ilə paylaş:
    1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   29




    Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©genderi.org 2024
    rəhbərliyinə müraciət

        Ana səhifə