|
Four Models of Competition and their Implications for Marketing Strategypartners or with the firm's wholly owned subnelson-1994-four-models-of-competition-and-their-implications-for-marketing-strategy partners or with the firm's wholly owned sub
sidiaries. Coordination of key activities performed
in different countries is a key element in determin
ing the success or failure of a global or international
marketing strategy effort (Porter, 1986, pp 30-32).
Coordination can: encourage the development and
sharing of expertise among dispersed units, allow
the firm to achieve a unified brand image and
reputation, and permit the firm to respond to shift
ing comparative advantages by moving activities
easily from one unit to another (thereby enhancing
the firm's leverage with local governments). In
short, coordination itself can become a prime
source of competitive advantage.
• Marketing managers must constantly take efforts to
overcome barriers to globalization erected by their
own firms. Sometimes, barriers will be in the form
of centralized policies and procedures that limit
creativity or communication. Sometimes, barriers
will be political, as when units in a firm compete
with each other by withholding valuable informa
tion. Sometimes, barriers will be in the form of
prejudices and biases between units or between
headquarters and units. Removal of these barriers
by suitable means should be one of the highest
priorities for marketing managers operating in a
global environment.
• The scope of marketing strategy expands when
going from domestic to global orientation. Added
target markets include politicians and agencies in
national and local governments, mass media, and
coalition partners (including subsidiaries). Market
ing strategy still relies on product, price, distribu
tion and promotion decisions, and investments.
However, public relations and publicity often oc
cupy a more prominent role than in domestic
markets.
• While international and global markets often tempt
managers to adopt a country-tailored strategy
aimed at diverse segments in countries viewed as
disparate, strategic competitive advantage is more
easily obtained by developing universal products
aimed at universal segments found in homogene-
ous country groups (Takeuchi and Porter, 1986, pp
142-143). Universal products, universal segments,
and homogeneous country groups permit: (1)
economies of scale in production, advertising,
packaging, and servicing and (2) coordination ef-
ficiencies described in sixth section above. Univer-
sal products and packages need hot be identical;
they can differ in style or features and still not harm
scale economies or coordination. Similarly, univer-
sal segments need not be identical in all respects
from market to market.
As summary, a globalization model of competition
represents a current view. The model adds complexity
to preceding models in terms of many variables pre-
viously not discussed: cultures, histories, business prac-
tices, currencies, market entry "red tape," distance, and
time. Strategy is seldom simple in a globalization
model.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|