TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
16
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
The consequence of this is that more severe problems are associated with the
removal and subsequent disposal of any such scales once formed (Payne,
1987; Tanner, 1986; Mazzolini, 1990).
The disposal of LSA scale is also subject to severe
regulatory control and
removal/disposal can prove expensive. This aspect is another important
benefit in the prevention, rather than the removal, of scale formation.
2.4 Methods of Scale Prevention and Mitigation
This section outlines how the methods of recovery, together with the well types
used to extract oil/gas, have a significant implication
on the severity of the
various scaling problems – these problems are encountered when water
production occurs in an oil/gas field.
2.4.1 Reservoir Recovery Methods
Natural depletion
If a reservoir is to be naturally depleted then only the formation brine/connate
water will be produced. It is, therefore, very unlikely
that sulphate scales will
form in such a production scenario.
However, if bicarbonate and divalent cations such as calcium,
magnesium
(and even in rare case strontium and barium) are present in high enough
concentrations, then carbonate scale may form –
leading to production
problems.
As already discussed, carbonate scale will form
wherever the produced fluid
pressure drops and passes through the CO
2
bubble point (typically in the
upper portion of the production tubing and/or topside).
Again, as discussed, in a natural depletion scenario it is possible to envisage a
situation where the bubble point passes into the formation itself and can result
in carbonate scale within the near-wellbore formation.
Although carbonate scale is easier to control by acid washing and squeezing,
the possibility of scale forming within the formation
makes it necessary to
perform squeeze treatments.
TOPIC 2: Oilfield Scale
17
©H
ERIOT
-W
ATT
U
NIVERSITY B41OA December 2018 v3
Dostları ilə paylaş: