sacrifice which all Christians are exhorted to offer is the sacrifice of
their person and property to
the Lord, and the spiritual sacrifice of thanksgiving and praise.
127
26 In one passage a Christian
"altar" is spoken of, in distinction from the Jewish altar of literal and daily sacrifices, but this altar
is the cross on which Christ offered himself once and forever for the sins of the world.
128
27
After the gradual abatement of the extraordinary spiritual elevation of the apostolic age,
which anticipated in its way the ideal condition of the church, the distinction of a regular class of
teachers from the laity became more fixed and prominent. This appears first in Ignatius, who, in
his high episcopalian spirit, considers the clergy the necessary medium of access for the people to
God. "Whoever is within the sanctuary (or altar), is pure; but he who is outside of the sanctuary is
not pure; that is, he who does anything without bishop and presbytery and deacon, is not pure in
conscience."
129
28 Yet he nowhere represents the ministry as a sacerdotal office. The Didache calls
"the prophets" high-priests, but probably in a spiritual sense.
130
29
Clement of Rome, in writing to
the congregation at Corinth, draws a significant and fruitful parallel between the Christian presiding
office and the Levitical priesthood, and uses the expression "layman" (
) as antithetic to
high-priest, priests, and Levites.
131
30
This parallel contains the germ of the whole system of
sacerdotalism. But it is at best only an argument by analogy. Tertullian was the first who expressly
and directly asserts sacerdotal claims on behalf of the Christian ministry, and calls it "sacerdotium,"
although he also strongly affirms the universal priesthood of all believers. Cyprian (d. 258) goes
still further, and applies all the privileges, duties, and responsibilities of the Aaronic priesthood to
the officers of the Christian church, and constantly calls them sacerdotes and sacerdotium. He may
therefore be called the proper father of the sacerdotal conception of the Christian ministry as a
mediating agency between God and the people. During the third century it became customary to
apply the term "priest" directly and exclusively to the Christian ministers especially the bishops.
132
31
In the same manner the whole ministry, and it alone, was called "clergy," with a double reference
127
Rom. 12:1; Phil. 2:17; 1 Pet. 2:5; Heb. 13:16.
128
Heb. 13:10. So
θυσιαστήριον is understood by Thomas Aquinas, Bengel, Bleek, Lünemann, Riehm, etc. Others explain it
of the Lord’s table, Lightfoot (p. 263) of the congregation assembled for common worship.
129
Ad Trall.c. 7:
ὁ ἔντὸς θυσιαστήιον ὦν καθαρός ἐστιν ὁ δέ ἐκτὸς θυσιαστηρίου ὢν οὐ καθαρός ἐστιν· τουτέστιν, ὁ χωρὶς
ἐπισκόπου καὶ πρεσβυτερίου καὶ διακόνου πράσσων τι, οὖτος οὐ καθαρός ες̓τιν τῇ συνειδήσει.Funk’s ed. I. 208. Some MSS.
omit the second clause, perhaps from homoeoteleuton. Von Gebhardt and Harnack also omit it in the Greek text, but retain it in
the Latin (qui extra attare est, non mundus est). The
τουτέστιν evidently requires the clause.
130
Cf. ch. 13. See note in Schaff’s edition, p. 206
131
Ad Cor. 40: "Unto the high-priest his proper
services have been intrusted, and to the priests their proper office is appointed,
and upon the levites their proper ministrations are laid. The layman is bound by the layman’s ordinances (
ὁ λαϊκὸς ἄνθρωπος
τοῖς λαϊκοῖς προστάγμασιν δέδεται)." The passage occurs in the text of Bryennios as well as in the older editions, and there is
no good reason to suspect it of being an interpolation in the hierarchical interest, as Neander and Milman have done. Bishop
Lightfoot, in his St. Clement of Rome, p. 128 sq., puts a mild construction upon it, and says that the analogy does not extend to
the three orders, because Clement only knows two (bishops and deacons), and that the high priesthood of Christ is wholly different
in kind from the Mosaic high priesthood, and exempt from those very limitations on which Clement dwells in that chapter.
132
Sacerdos, also summus sacerdos (Tertullian, De Bapt. 7), and oncepontifex maximus (De Pudic. 1, with ironical reference,
it seems, to the Roman bishop); ordo sacerdotalis (De Exhort. Cast. 7);
ἱερεύς and sometimes ἀρχιερεύς (Apost. Const. II. 34,
35, 36, 57; III. 9; vi. 15, 18, etc.). Hippolytus calls his office an
ἀρχιερατεία and διδασκαλία (Ref. Haer. I. prooem.). Cyprian
generally applies the term sacerdos to the bishop, and calls his colleagues consacerdotales.
80
Philip Schaff
History
of the Christian Church, Volume II:
Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
to its presidency and its peculiar relation to God.
133
32
It was distinguished by this name from the
Christian people or "laity."
134
33 Thus the term "clergy," which first signified the lot by which office
was assigned (Acts 1:17, 25), then the office itself, then the persons holding that office, was
transferred from the Christians generally to the ministers exclusively.
Solemn "ordination" or consecration by the laying on of hands was the form of admission
into the "ordo ecclesiasticus" or "sacerdotalis." In this order itself there were again three degrees,
"ordines majores," as they were called: the diaconate, the presbyterate, and the episcopate—held
to be of divine institution. Under these were the "ordines minores," of later date, from sub-deacon
to ostiary, which formed the stepping-stone between the clergy proper and the people.
135
34
Thus we find, so early as the third century, the foundations of a complete hierarchy; though
a hierarchy of only moral power, and holding no sort of outward control over the conscience. The
body of the laity consisted of two classes: the faithful, or the baptized and communicating members,
and the catechumens, who were preparing for baptism. Those church members who lived together
in one place,
136
35
formed a church in the narrower sense.
137
36
With the exaltation of the clergy appeared the tendency to separate them from secular
business, and even from social relations—from marriage, for example—and to represent them,
even outwardly, as a caste independent of the people, and devoted exclusively to the service of the
sanctuary. They drew their support from the church treasury, which was supplied by voluntary
contributions and weekly collections on the Lord’s Day. After the third century they were forbidden
to engage in any secular business, or even to accept any trusteeship. Celibacy was not yet in this
period enforced, but left optional. Tertullian, Gregory of Nyssa, and other distinguished church
teachers, lived in wedlock, though theoretically preferring the unmarried state. Of an official clerical
costume no certain trace appears before the fourth century; and if it came earlier into use, as may
have been the ease, after the example of the Jewish church, it must have been confined, during the
times of persecution, to the actual exercises of worship.
With the growth of this distinction of clergy and laity, however, the idea of the universal
priesthood continued from time to time to assert itself: in Irenaeus,
138
37
for example, and in an
eccentric form in the Montanists, who even allowed women to teach publicly in the church. So
Tertullian, with whom clerus and laici were at one time familiar expressions, inquires, as the
133
Κλῆρος,clerus, τάξιςordo, ordosacerdotalis (Tertulli, De Ehort. Cast. 7), ordo eccelesiasticus orecclesiae (De Monog. 11;
De Idolol. 7);
κληρικοί, clerici. The first instance perhaps of the use of clerus in the sense of clergy is in Tertullian,De Monog.
c. 12: "Unde enim episcopi et clerus ?" and: "Extollimur et inflamur adversus clerum." Jerome (Ad Nepotian.) explains this
exclusive application of clerus to ministers, "vel quia de sorte sunt Domini, vel quia ipse Dominus sors, id est, pars clericorum
est." The distinction between the regular clergy, who were also monks, and the secular clergy or parish priests, is of much later
date (seventh or eighth century).
134
Λαός, λαϊκοί, plebs. In Tertullian, Cyprian, and in the Apostolic Constitutions the term " layman" occurs very often. Cyprian
speaks (250) of a " conference held with bishops, presbyters, deacons, confessors, and also with laymen who stood firm"(in
persecution), Ep. 30, ad Rom
135
.Occasionally, however we find a somewhat wider terminology. Tertullian mentions, De Monog c. 12, the ordo viduarum
among the ordines ecclesiastici, and even the much later Jerome (see In Jesaiam, l. v.c. 19, 18), enumerates quinque ecclesiae
ordines, episcopos, presbyteros, diaconos, fideles, catechumenos.
136
Πάροικοι, παρεπίδημοι, Eph. 2:19; 1 Pet. 2:11.
137
or parish,
παροικία.
138
Adv. Haer. iv. 8, §.
81
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.