inbreeding depression can play a major role
in driving population dynamics,
particularly when populations are quite small (i. e., less than 75-100 individuals).
We can look at the average output from each of these three models to more
directly evaluate their differences. This is shown in Figure 4. A more detailed
viability analysis, often including 200 - 400 different models (scenarios), can
provide a very detailed picture of the population dynamics of the species under
study. Through this process, researchers and managers can study the population's
response to changes in environment and changes in management over time. Using
this information,' better decisions can be made regarding the effective
conservation management of threatened species around the world.
Figure 3. Summary plots of average population size (left panel) and probability of population
persistence (right panel) for the three population models described in the text.
Figure 3. Population
trajectories from a
VORTEX
Mesoamerican jaguar
population model in which
inbreeding depression
(expressed as increased
cub mortality) ¡s included.
Year
Population Size
Population Persistence
111 JAG_ BASE: OUT
222 JAG_001:OUT
333 JAG_002:OUT
111 JAG_ BASE: OUT
222 JAG_001:OUT
333 JAG_002: OUT
A Preliminary Analysis of the Mesoamerican Regional Population of
Jaguars in Captivity
Philip Miller, CBSG
In collaboration with Fernando Cabezas, Mesoamerican Jaguar Studbook
Keeper at the Zoológico Nacional Simón Bolívar, Costa Rica, we were able to
complete a simple set of preliminary analyses of the genetic status of the captive
population. We used the Regional Studbook that had been updated on 28
November 2000.
At the time of the last update, the Studbook included a total of 24 wild-caught
individuals. In addition, 17 animals born in captivity had at least one parent with
known ancestry, while 6 animals were born from parents of unknown ancestry
(giving a total of23 captive-born animals currently living in Mesoamerican zoos).
Finally, 17 living animals have completely unknown ancestry, so we do not know if
these individuals have one or two wild-caught parents. Because of their unknown
ancestry, we have chosen to remove these animals from the analysis and are
focusing on those animals of known ancestry in the current Studbook.
We can use computer methods of analysis to evaluate the degree of representation
(ancestry) from each of the wild-caught animals in the Studbook. This analysis is
shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Chart of the extent of representation of wild-caught jaguars in the
Mesoamerican Regional Studbook. Representation ¡s defined here as the
percentage of genes in the descendant captive-born population that can be
traced to a given wild-caught individual.
Two important! conclusions can be drawn from this analysis:
• Only 10 of the 24 wild-caught individuals have produced living offspring in the
current captive population. Therefore, more than half of the group of wild-
caught individuals has not yet contributed genes to the captive population.
• Of those wild-caught individuals that have successfully bred, the representation
of these individuals is highly skewed in favor of just two or three animals. A
fundamental objective of genetic management of captive populations is to breed
all wild-caught individuals in such a way as to equalize the genetic
representation of each individual in the descendent population. Clearly, this
objective has not yet been met.
As a result of the highly skewed representation of wild-caught individuals in the
descendent population, the extent of genetic variation present in the wild-caught
population is not well-represented in the descendent population. Specifically, only
88.7% of the total extent of genetic variation from breeding wild-caught individuals
is present in the descendent population. Most detailed genetic management
strategies set the minimum level of genetic variation to be retained at 90%.
Therefore, the current captive population of jaguars in Mesoamerica is not meeting
that minimum goal.
However, this goal could be achieved through preferential breeding of those wild-
caught animals that have not yet bred. A listing of the total group of living wild-
caught jaguars in shown below.
Numero del pedigrí
Edad
Parentesco medio
Localidad
Hembras
49
>3
0.0
Ciudad de Guatemala
61
>6
0.0
San José,
Costa Rica
50
>7
0.0
Salvador, Brasil
51
>7
0.0
Salvador, Brasil
92 •.
> 14
0.0
Tapachula, México
91
«18
0.0
Zoomat, México
22
>15
0.0185
San José, Costa Rica
63
UNK
0.0185
Pucallpa, Perú
8
>21
0.0185
Santa Domingo, RD
57
>8
0.0555
Minerva, Guatemala
24
>5
0.0833
San José, Costa Rica
3 >12
0.1111
Guadalajara,
México
Machos
0.0
48
0.0 Guatemala
City
14
>6
0.0 Belize
17
>7
0.0 Belize
60
>8
0.0
San José, Costa Rica
9
> 10
0.0 Pucallpa,
Perú
47
> 13
0.0 Zoomat,
México
11
>15
0.0 Paipai,
Perú
93
>15
0.0 Zoomat,
México
62
UNK
0.0185 Pucallpa,
Perú
21
>21
0.0185
San José,
Costa Rica
25
>5
0.0833
San José, Costa Rica