Chapter 5 - The social origins of Dutch mothers’ gender values and ideal family life
143
Kraaykamp, 2012;
Thompson, 1991
). I thus expect that religious mothers have
more traditional general gender values and a more traditional conception of the
ideal family life. The respondents were asked how often, aside from special
occasions such as weddings and funerals, they attend religious gatherings
nowadays: 1: every day; 2: more
than once a week; 3: once a week; 4: at least
once a week; 5: only on special religious days; 6: less often; 7: never. 53 per cent
of the respondents replied never, and approximately 10 per cent attend religious
gatherings once a week or more often.
Partner. Cohabiting mothers may be expected to be more in support of
traditional values and personal ideals compared to single mothers, since they can
rely financially on their partners. A career-oriented husband
may work long work
hours and leave the bulk of household responsibilities to his wife, causing her to
adapt her personal view of her ideal family life to a more traditional family life,
mainly to reduce feelings of dissonance (Festinger, Riecken, and Schachter, 1956;
Kroska and Elman, 2009). Nonetheless, a mother with more traditional values and
perception of the ideal family life may also be less likely to become a single
mother compared to mothers with more egalitarian values and ideals. The
relationship is thus perceived as reciprocal. The respondents were asked whether
they
lived together with a partner, whether married or unmarried (1: no; 2: yes).
The vast majority of the sample, 87 per cent, lives together with a partner.
Parents’ educational level. Based on social stratification theory, I control for
the parental educational level. From previous studies it is known that higher-
educated parents tend to transmit more liberal or progressive values (Sanders,
1997). Therefore it is assumed that the higher the educational achievements of a
respondent’s parents, the more egalitarian her gender values and her view of the
ideal family life will be. The educational level of her parents
is measured across
five categories instead of the 6 categories which were used for the educational
level of the mother herself (2 and 3 are merged into one category: secondary
school).
Table 12 gives an overview of the descriptives of both the dependent and the
independent variables in the analysis. Table 13 gives the correlations between the
variables included in the path model.
Socialized Choices - Labour Market Behaviour of Dutch Mothers
144
Table 12. Descriptives dependent and independent variables
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std.
Deviation
1. General gender values
834
0
0.80
.506
.137
2. Personal
ideal family life
930
1
3
2.40
.69
3. Level of education
936
1
6
3.73
1.32
4. Attendance to religious gatherings
833
1
7
2.08
1.453
5. Partner 935
0
1
.87
.333
6. Level of education respondent’s father
863
1
5
2.03
.996
7. Level of education respondent’s mother
837
1
5
2.42
1.18
8. Mother had a paid job when respondent
was twelve
935 0
1 .30 .46
9. Age 935
18
64
43.70
8.337
10. Age squared/100
935
3.24
40.96
19.63
7.39
11. Home oriented mother
935
0
1
.44
.50
12. Work oriented mother
935
0
1
.28
.45
13. Which proposition does apply to your
mother most?
206 1
4 1,54 1,020
14. How did you mother experience the fact
that she did not performed paid work?
562 1
5 1,86 1,380
15. A
good education is important
934
0
1
.59
.492
16. You have to carry out your full
potential.
934 0
1 .24 .425
17. Caring for others is important
934 0
1 .32 .467
18. (Paid) work is above all fun.
934
0
1
.05
.227
19. Through work you are valued by your
social environment
934 0
1 .08 .270
20. You only should do what you really
want
934 0
1 .29 .453
21. Work is above all a way to receive
income
934 0
1 .15 .360
22. You
have to work in order to be
financially independent of others
934 0
1 .33 .471
23. You should work in order to contribute
to society
934 0
1 .12 .323
24. When you don’t perform paid work, you
are less worthwhile
934 0
1 .00 .057
25. Making a good career in important
934
0
1
.06
.241
26. Motivated
by people at work
935
0
1
.24
.43
27. Motivated by teachers
935
1
2
1.13
.33
28. Motivated to work by parents
935
0
1
.16
.48
29. Motivated to work by friends
935
0
1
.07
.26
30. Motivated to work by partner
935
0
1
.26
.44
Source: Data from questionnaires: ‘Politics and Values’, ‘Work and Schooling’, ‘Women and their
social environment’, Liss Panel, Centerdata, University of Tilburg, November 2010.