Productivity
Organizations naturally become more productive when they model and train
front-end next-action decision-making. For all
the reasons mentioned above,
determining the required physical allocation of resources necessary to make
something happen as soon as the outcome has been clarified will produce more
results sooner, and with less effort.
There are risks and costs to a program of
action, but they are far less than the long-range
risks and costs of comfortable inaction.
—John F. Kennedy
Learning to break through the barriers of the sophisticated creative thinking
that can freeze activity—that is, the entangled psychic webs we spin—is a
superior skill. “Productivity” has been touted for decades as a desirable thing to
improve in organizations. Anything that can help maximize output will do that.
But
in the world of knowledge work, all the computers and telecom
improvements and leadership seminars on the planet will make no difference in
this regard unless the individuals involved
increase their operational
responsiveness. And that requires thinking about something that lands in your
world
before
you have to.
One of the biggest productivity leaks I have seen in some organizations is the
lack of next actions determined for “long-term” projects. “Long-term” does not
mean “Someday/Maybe.” Those projects with distant
goal lines are still to be
done as soon as possible; “long-term” simply means, “more action steps until it’s
done,” not “no need to decide next actions because the day of reckoning is so far
away.” When every project and open loop in an organization is being monitored,
it’s a whole new ball game.