For
the space of ten years, ending with his triumphant martyrdom, Cyprian administered
the episcopal office in Carthage with exemplary energy, wisdom, and fidelity, and that in a most
stormy time, amidst persecutions from without and schismatic agitations within. The persecution
under Valerian brought his active labors to a close. He was sent into exile for eleven months, then
tried before the Proconsul, and condemned to be beheaded. When the sentence was pronounced,
he said: "Thanks be to God," knelt in prayer, tied the bandage over his eyes with his own hand,
gave to the executioner a gold piece, and died with the dignity and composure of a hero. His friends
removed and buried his body by night. Two chapels were erected on the spots of his death and
burial. The anniversary of his death was long observed; and five sermons of Augustin still remain
in memory of Cyprian’s martyrdom, Sept. 14, 258.
II. Character and Position.
As Origen was the ablest scholar, and Tertullian the strongest writer, so Cyprian was the
greatest bishop, of the third century. He was born to be a prince in the church. In executive talent,
he even surpassed all the Roman bishops of his time; and he bore himself towards them, also, as
"frater" and "collega," in the spirit of full equality. Augustin calls him by, eminence, "the catholic
bishop and catholic martyr;" and Vincentius of Lirinum, "the light of all saints, all martyrs, and all
bishops." His stamp of character was more that of Peter than either of Paul or John.
His peculiar importance falls not so much in the field of theology, where he lacks originality
and depth, as in church organization and discipline. While Tertullian dealt mainly with heretics,
Cyprian directed his polemics against schismatics, among whom he had to condemn, though he
never does in fact, his venerated teacher, who died a Montanist. Yet his own conduct was not
perfectly consistent with his position; for in the controversy on heretical baptism he himself exhibited
his master’s spirit of opposition to Rome. He set a limit to his own exclusive catholic principle of
tradition by the truly Protestant maxims: "Consuetudo sine veritate vetustas erroris est, and, Non
est de consuetudine praescribendum, sed ratione vincendum." In him the idea of the old catholic
hierarchy and episcopal autocracy, both in its affinity and in its conflict with the idea of the papacy,
was personally embodied, so to speak, and became flesh and blood. The unity of the church, as the
vehicle and medium of all salvation, was the thought of his life and the passion of his heart. But
he contended with the same zeal for an independent episcopate as for a Roman primacy; and the
authority of his name has been therefore as often employed against the papacy as in its favor. On
both sides he was the faithful organ of the churchly spirit of the age.
It were great injustice to attribute his high churchly principle to pride and ambition, though
temptations to this spirit unquestionably beset a prominent position like his. Such principles are,
entirely compatible with sincere personal humility before God. It was the deep conviction of the
divine authority, and the heavy responsibility of the episcopate, which lay it the bottom both of his
first "nolo episcopari, " and of subsequent hierarchical feeling. He was as conscientious in
discharging the duties, as he was jealous in maintaining the rights, of his office. Notwithstanding
his high conception of the dignity of a bishop, he took counsel of his presbyters in everything, and
respected the rights of his people. He knew how to combine strictness and moderation, dignity and
gentleness, and to inspire love and confidence as well as esteem and veneration. He took upon
himself, like a father, the care of the widows and orphans, the poor and sick. During the great
pestilence of 252 he showed the most self-sacrificing fidelity to his flock, and love for his enemies.
He forsook his congregation, indeed, in the Decian persecution, but only, as he expressly assured
them, in pursuance of a divine admonition, and in order to direct them during his fourteen months
526
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.
of exile by pastoral epistles. His conduct exposed him to the charge of cowardice. In the Valerian
persecution he completely washed away the stain of that flight with the blood of his calm and
cheerful martyrdom.
He exercised first rigid discipline, but at a later period—not in perfect consistency—he
moderated his disciplinary principles in prudent accommodation to the exigencies of the times.
With Tertullian he prohibited all display of female dress, which only deformed the work of the
Creator; and he warmly opposed all participation in heathen amusements,—even refusing a converted
play-actor permission to give instruction in declamation and pantomime. He lived in a simple,
ascetic way, under a sense of the perishableness of all earthly things, and in view of the solemn
eternity, in which alone also the questions and strifes of the church militant would be perfectly
settled. "Only above," says he in his tract De Mortalitate, which be composed during the pestilence,
"only above are true peace, sure repose, constant, firm, and eternal security; there is our dwelling,
there our home. Who would not fain hasten to reach it? There a great multitude of beloved awaits
us; the numerous host of fathers, brethren, and children. There is a glorious choir of apostles there
the number of exulting prophets; there the countless multitude of martyrs, crowned with victory
after warfare and suffering; there triumphing virgins; there the merciful enjoying their reward.
Thither let us hasten with longing desire; let us wish to be soon with them, soon with Christ. After
the earthly comes the heavenly; after the small follows the great after perishableness, eternity."
III. His writings.
As an author, Cyprian is far less original, fertile and vigorous than Tertullian, but is clearer,
more moderate, and more elegant and rhetorical in his style. He wrote independently only on the
doctrines of the church, the priesthood, and sacrifice.
(1.) His most important works relate to practical questions on church government and
discipline. Among these is his tract on the Unity of the Church (A. D. 251), that "magna charta"
of the old catholic high-church spirit, the commanding importance of which we have already
considered. Then eighty-one Epistles,
1557
558
some very long, to various bishops, to the clergy and
the churches of Africa and of Rome, to the confessors, to the lapsed, &c.; comprising also some
letters from others in reply, as from Cornelius of Rome and Firmilian of Caesarea. They give us a
very graphic picture of his pastoral labors, and of the whole church life of that day. To the same
class belongs also his treatise: De Lapsis (A. D. 250) against loose penitential discipline.
(2.) Besides these he wrote a series of moral works, On the Grace of God (246); On the
Lord’s Prayer (252); On Mortality (252); against worldly-mindedness and pride of dress in
consecrated virgins (De Habitu Virginum); a glowing call to Martyrdom; an exhortation to liberality
(De Opere el Eleemosynis, between 254 and 256), with a touch of the "opus operatum" doctrine;
and two beautiful tracts written during his controversy with pope Stephanus: De Bono Patienti, and
De Zelo et Livore (about 256), in which he exhorts the excited minds to patience and moderation.
(3.) Least important are his two apologetic works, the product of his Christian pupilage.
One is directed against heathenism (de Idolorum Vanitate), and is borrowed in great part, often
verbally, from Tertullian and Minucius Felix. The other, against Judaism (Testimonia adversus
Judaeos), also contains no new thoughts, but furnishes a careful collection of Scriptural proofs of
the Messiahship and divinity of Jesus.
1557
The order of them varies in different editions occasioning frequent confusion in citation.
527
Philip Schaff
History of the Christian Church, Volume II: Ante-Nicene
Christianity. A.D. 100-325.