fin de siècle
in modern Western cultures, acknowledge such a centennial
renewal. On a smaller scale, celebrating the beginning of a new year in most
cultures conveys a sense of cyclical renewal. The Persian celebration of the
Nowruz at the vernal equinox, for instance, commemorates seasonal renewal
as a token of the millennial turn.
Millennialism and other forms of apocalyptic calendaric hence appear to
be inherent to all Middle Eastern religions. It may be argued that they are far
more essential for the continuity of the sacred and its perpetual renewal than
our modern utilitarian notion of linear time and the concept of progress.
Time cycles thus may be seen as regulatory means of placing utopian and
eschatological aspirations, and whatever is associated with the Beginning and
the End, within a humanly conceivable time-frame. Those who sifted through
the sacred text for evidence of the End, laboured over the esoteric methods
of discovering the encoded message, and subjected themselves and their
followers to a rigorous course of abstinence, penitence and social exclusion,
viewed the certainty of such calendaric calculations as indispensable and
indisputable. For them the millennial turn (and other forms of calendaric
cycles) had a momentary urgency, and the potential to actualize apocalyptic
aspirations. These individuals and communities, by taking upon themselves
the divine charge of bringing closer the hour of the End, attempt to fulfil the
conditions scripted in the text. In an impregnated millennial momentum,
common to all apocalyptic trends, a crucial shift occurs from dormant aspira-
tions to vigilant ambitions. This turning point invariably pertains to crossing
a psychological barrier – one which divides adherence to the established belief
system from an experience of rebirth – and in turn discovering a communal
identity with like-minded individuals.
Playing an active part in temporalizing the apocalyptic scenario, the par-
ticipants view their role, and that of their opponents, as divinely ordained
though not entirely devoid of human initiatives and strategies. This curious
mix of the scripted and the improvised, the providential design and its human
deciphering, is germane to most apocalyptic currents. It stands to determine
the nature of their unravelling, whether peaceful and ‘optimistic’, radical and
destructive, or more often a combination of the two. Yet in all instances an
urgency for arriving at the divine judgment, salvation and millennial bliss
remains the ultimate goal. In the visions of the End we observe the ideals of
generations, utopian dreams and nightmares, fanatical obsessions with provid-
ential plan, and prospect for a regressive or a progressive future; a mirror to
societies’ innate fears and aspirations.
Predictably, millennial visions frequently contrasted with prevailing legal,
theological and even pietistic norms of their time. Even more so, they were
in conflict with the authorities, religious and temporal, who represented these
5
Introduction
norms or served as their guardians. The history of millenarianism in all
Western religions is suffused with, using a Weberian concept, clashes between
priests and prophets. Yet precisely this antinomian quality of the apocalyptic
experience, even in its speculative and tangential manifestation, brings to bear
an imaginative alternative to the sanctified dogma. Whether crude and naïve
at their inception or fully developed and articulated, these trends sought
creative directions untenable to prevailing theology, if not altogether pro-
hibited by it. Yet not all millennial trends were forward-looking in their
doctrinal disposition or inclusive in their social message. Moreover, some
mystics and theologians, even philosophers, who were not overtly millenarian
in their recognized thinking, at times subscribed to millennial paradigms to
put across their most speculative, controversial and utopian thoughts. Covert
millennialism, for the greater part, still remains unexplored. Engagements of
these speculative millennialists, overt or covert, did not, however, exclude a
vast array of those individuals labelled as crackpots, eccentrics and fanatics,
those who crowded the history of popular apocalypticism. Nor can one fail
to notice at times in the same millennial environment, contrasts and com-
promises of glaring magnitude. A not so subtle coexistence of the mundane
and the sublime defined many apocalyptic quests. An uneasy marriage of
anger, violence and intolerance with peace and acumen, of naïveté and
demagogy with sophistication and creativity, and of folk beliefs with venerable
erudition, characterizes the visionary ground upon which millennial edifices
were often built.
Contradictions aside, in their morally sharpened worldview, millenarians
reject the legalistic and ritualistic strategies for salvation as offered by religious
authorities (though they often do incorporate the mystical and the ascetic
ways). In their effort to save the world from evil, millennialists often demand
total justice, material plenty and, at times, liberation from the yoke of religious
or secular law by seeking an end to the prevailing order. In their estimation,
such an order equates with absolute evil for its presumed corruption, injustice
and the decadence that it has brought upon God’s community.
Cycles and the Advent of the Messiah
A unifying motif in speculative millennialism, and a converging point of the
absolute and the relative in this mode of thinking, is the concept of cyclical
renovation. Imagining the End, whether a literal or allegorical annihilation of
the physical world, necessitates a chaotic jolt to facilitate a new Beginning.
Millennial currents, except perhaps for the most ‘pessimistic’ and/or doc-
trinally inarticulate, subscribe to one form or another of cyclical rebirth so as
to place the convulsions of the End in a broader, and humanly more tolerable,
6
Imagining the End
scheme. Such apocalyptic deconstruction is not an entirely aimless or nihilistic
process. Though it often reflects the violent aspirations of the persecuted and
the deprived, it also guarantees the continuity of the human race in celestial
or terrestrial forms, be it the timeless bliss of an otherworldly paradise or in
the post-apocalyptic reality. Such reality adheres to postponed prophecies
and anticipation but also may attempt to build a earthly community on the
perceived celestial model.
Inevitably, all apocalyptic currents subscribe to some form of symbolism,
for it is difficult, even for strict literalists, not to read some level of allegory
into the admonishing prophecies of the Hebrew Bible, the terrifying imagery
of the Book of Revelation, or the warnings of the Qur'an and the
hadith
(the
words and deeds of the Prophet). At least in early Christianity, even St
Augustine’s post-millennial doctrine, which denied the possible occurrence
of an earthly apocalypse, could not be argued without resorting to some
metaphorical device. Yet literal interpretations of the End are more likely to
adhere narrowly to a sequence of prophesied events and to identify all heroes
and villains in an apocalyptic scenario. Symbolic interpretations of the End,
in contrast, are more likely to acquire a historical perspective, reading a hidden
moral drama behind the textual description and seeking an imaginative, and
even progressive, view of the future. Here the End paradigm is consciously
employed to justify a doctrinal break with the existing ‘orthodoxy’. The
divinely consecrated orthodoxies, whether the church, the
shari'a
, or the
Talmudic law, are considered timeless and eternal and cannot be perceived as
terminable except with the occurrence of an apocalyptic End.
The theme of progression (or regression), associated with symbolic in-
terpretation of the apocalyptic, views cyclical phases of human history as
purposeful movements in time in either forwards or backwards directions.
The metaphor commonly employed in the apocalyptic literature, such as in
Zoroastrianism, is that of a tree, reflecting both a seasonal cycle and a gradual
growth at the turn of a each cycle, hence spiral turns. The effectiveness of
the tree metaphor lies in the fact that movement in time could be seen either
as a process of maturation and strength or, alternatively, as regression towards
eventual, though distant, demise. In either case, this spiral movement in time
was distinct from the notion of immutable cycles upheld by some ancient
Mesopotamian, or Egyptian, cosmologies whereby the eternal renewal of the
time-cycle does not result in any progression or regression. The myth of
the four-branched tree in the Book of Daniel, as discussed by John J. Collins
(Chapter
), and its Zoroastrian and Greek versions, mourns the eclipse of
a golden age, symbolized by the golden branch, to be followed in later cycles
by depreciated ages of silver, bronze (or iron) and clay. Such conception of
time, presumably representing metallurgical revolutions of the ancient times,
7
Introduction
denotes nostalgia for a golden past, contempt for the degenerate present, and
a gloomy future. This regressive view of history, however, is not entirely
devoid of potential for a dynamic, and even forward-looking, future. The end
to the age of clay eventually comes with conflagration of the entire material
world and reconstruction of the golden age. As late as in the Bab’s
Bayan
in
nineteenth-century Iran, we encounter the ‘tree of the truth’ conceptualizing
his progressive revelation within the context of past and future prophetic
cycles.
The act of cosmic reconstruction revolves around the figure of a human
saviour. The rebirth (
Dostları ilə paylaş: |