337 ‘Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science’ accessed on 03/07/06.
338 accessed 03/07/06.
339 accessed 03/07/06.
340 Sandra Harding, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”? 49-82 in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, Feminist Epistemologies (London: Routledge, 1993), 51.
341 Lugones, M and Spelman E. 1983, “Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism and the Demand for ‘The Woman’s Voice,’” Women’s Studies International Forum 6 (6): 573-81.
342 on 03/07/06.
343 Sandra Harding, “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”? in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, op. cit., 51.
344 Judith Evans, Feminist Theory Today: An Introduction to Second-Wave Feminism, (London: Sage Publications, 1995), 124.
345 accessed 03/07/06.
346 Sandra Harding, “From the Woman Question in Science to the Science Question in Feminism” 404-413 in Wendy K Kolmar and Frances Bartkowski, Feminist Theory: A Reader (New York: McGrawHill, 2005), 411.
347 accessed 03/07/06.
348 Ibid.
349 Bordo, S 1990 “Feminism, Post Modernism and Gender-Scepticism” in L Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Post Modernism (London: Routledge, 1990).
352 Helen E. Longino, “Subjects, Power and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science” 101-120 in in Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, Feminist Epistemologies (London: Routledge, 1993), 110.
353 Jane Flax, Disputed Subjects: Essays on Psychoanalysis, Politics and Philosophy (London: Routlege, 1993), 142. Flax uses the phrase ‘innocent knowledge’ to describe the Enlightenment hope that it is possible to obtain ‘better’ and ‘untainted’ knowledge- a straightforward, uncomplicated approach in research
354 Marysia Zalewski, “Feminist Methodology” 113-117 in Robert L Miller and John D Brewer, The A-Z of Social Research A Dictionary of Key Social Science Research Concepts (Sage: London, 2003), 116.
355 Ibid.
356 Caroline Ramazanoglu, Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression (London: Routledge, 1989), 5.
357 See for example, Anne Cranny-Francis et.al., Gender Studies: Terms and Debates (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003). See also, Myrtle Hill, op.cit., 118.
358 Wanda Deifelt, “Feminist Theology: A Key for Women’s Citizenship in the Church.” 237-248 in Towards a New Heaven and a New Earth, Fernando F Segovia (ed.) (New York: Maryknoll, 2003), 246.
359 John Brewer, “Verstehen”, 338-339 in The A-Z of Social Research, Edited by Robert L Miller and John D Brewer (London: Sage Publications, 2003), 338.
360 Max Weber, “Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology”, Sociological Quarterly, 22:151-180, 1981.
361 A ‘descriptive research’ provides an accurate profile of a group or situation, an excellent verbal picture to stimulate new explanation, document information that may contradict prior beliefs or in other words traditionally held concepts.
364 Y S Lincoln and E G Guba, “Pragmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences” 163-188 in N K Denzin and Y S Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000), 163-188
365 Walsham’s (1995) Lecture 1 on Interpretive Research in IS, Oslo University accessed on 08/07/06
366 Myrtle Hill, “Feminist Methodology” 117-120 in The A-Z of Social Research A Dictionary of Key Social Science Research Concepts, Robert L Miller and John D Brewer (Sage: London, 2003), 118-119.
367 Geoff Walsham. (2006) Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems15:3, 320.