- 18 -
Time-scale: medium
2.1.3. Promote prevention of disturbance
At all key sites, but especially at wintering sites, disturbance (intentional and unintentional)
should be kept to a minimum. Where serious disturbance is being caused to Slender-billed
Curlews, reserve wardens should have the power to close certain areas to visitors.
Priority: medium
Time-scale: short
2.1.4. Promote appropriate management of key sites
Encourage the provision of all necessary resources – financial and manpower – for the effective
protection and management of such sites. Where countries do not have sufficient resources for
essential management, international organisations, including BirdLife International, should help
raise funds. Management plans will be needed for key sites, taking into account the Slender-
billed Curlew's needs, e.g. the creation of wet areas, drained fishponds, appropriate grazing
levels and, where necessary, reserve maintenance should be fine-tuned to the needs of the
Slender-billed Curlew, e.g. appropriate timing of fishpond drainage in the Hortobágy.
Priority: high
Time-scale: ongoing
2.1.5. Promote protection of breeding grounds
Should the breeding grounds be found, all necessary steps will need to be taken to give the
species total protection from any disturbance, or threat of predation. Decisions on conservation
actions on the breeding grounds should be taken by a specialist Slender-billed Curlew working
group (involving those searching for the breeding grounds under the agreement of cooperation
with Novosibirsk). Great care should be taken with distribution of information. If necessary such
information should be kept completely confidential.
Priority:
high (when breeding grounds are found)
Time-scale: ongoing
3.
MONITORING AND RESEARCH
3.1.
To locate and study the current breeding grounds
3.1.1. Undertake ground surveys to locate breeding grounds
Due to the present lack of transmitters small enough to undertake satellite tracking (see 3.1.2)
ground searches for the breeding grounds should continue.
Priority: essential
Time-scale: ongoing
3.1.2. Develop technology to enable use of satellite tracking (from a wintering site) to pinpoint
the breeding area
Such a technique will only be feasible if transmitter weight comes down to 10–12 g and the
process must be carried out with every possible care and precaution. If battery power allows,
such tracking could also provide information on the spring migration route and stopover sites. In
the event of the technology becoming available, it may be necessary to establish an international
protocol as to the use of the technique for this species.
- 19 -
Priority: high
Time-scale: medium/long
3.1.3. Studies in the summering/breeding area, if located
Only 2–3 experienced researchers should be involved, with wardens available if necessary to
protect the site. If nesting birds are seen, the maximum possible amount of information should be
obtained, using all available techniques (including video monitoring, if feasible). Following such
research, any necessary management measures should be carefully introduced (habitat
management, predator control, supplementary feeding, etc. see 2.1.5.).
Priority:
high (when breeding grounds are found)
Time-scale: medium
3.2.
To locate and study further key wintering and passage sites
3.2.1. Ground
surveys
In the absence of the necessary satellite-tracking transmitters at present, ground surveys should
be continued, particularly in the least-known countries. Much time has already been spent on
such surveys and a good deal of useful information has resulted. Observers must be sufficiently
experienced and training sessions organised where necessary. The use of a good telescope is
essential in almost all cases. Ground surveys will be difficult in some countries (eg Algeria and
Iraq) until the political situation improves.
Priority:
high (wintering areas: Algeria, Iran, Iraq, southern Morocco, Spain)
medium (passage sites: Croatia, Kazakhstan, south-west Russia, Turkey,
Ukraine)
Time-scale: ongoing
3.2.2. Satellite-tracking
If this can be carried out (and if it works well), unprecedented information will result on at least
the spring migration route. If Slender-billed Curlews rest for a few days at stopover sites,
observers on the ground could be alerted and could gather detailed information, as has been
successfully achieved for the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus in some countries.
At present it is unlikely that autumn and wintering sites could be located by this means, due to
limitations on battery life.
Priority:
high (if possible)
Time-scale: medium/long
3.2.3. Monitor known (and any further identified) key sites
Where possible such monitoring should be carried out by on-site (or local) reserve
staff/ornithologists. Full details should be recorded of all sightings (on Slender-billed Curlew
record sheets) and if possible detailed observations should be made. A full research programme
should be carried out at wintering sites (Merja Zerga is currently the only regular site known)
and, using such research, recommendations for beneficial management should be made. A
central register of sightings of the species should be kept pending greater understanding of key
sites and migration routes.
Priority: medium
Time-scale: ongoing