attended conventions from that day to this, of one kind and another,
and taken part in them. I have taken part in some in which our
Comrade Debs had a part. I was at the organization that he orga-
nized in this city some eight or ten years ago. Now, the point I want
to make is that these conventions are full of enthusiasm. And that
is right: we should sometimes mix sentiment with soberness; it is a
part of life.
But when you go out of this hall, when you have laid aside your
enthusiasm, then comes the solid work. Are you going out of here
with your minds made up that the class which we call ourselves,
revolutionary Socialists so-called—that class is organized to meet
organized capital with the millions at its command? It has many
weapons to fi ght us. First, it has money. Th
en, it has legislative tools.
Th
en, it has armories, and last, it has the gallows. We call ourselves
revolutionists. Do you know what the capitalists mean to do to
you revolutionists? I simply throw these hints out that you young
people may become refl ective and know what you have to face at
the fi rst, and then it will give you strength. I am not here to cause
any discouragement, but simply to encourage you to go on in your
grand work.
Now, that is the solid foundation that I hope this organization
will be built on—that it may be built not like a house upon the sand,
that when the waves of adversity come it may go over into the ocean
of oblivion, but that it shall be built upon a strong, granite-hard
foundation, a foundation made up of the hearts and aspirations of
the men and women of this twentieth century, who have set their
minds, their hands, their hearts, and their heads against the past
with all its miserable poverty, with its wage slaves, with its children
ground into dividends, with its miners away down under the earth
and with never the light of sunshine, and with its women selling the
holy name of womanhood for a day’s board. I hope we understand
that this organization has set its face against that iniquity, and that
it has set its eyes to the rising star of liberty that means fraternity,
solidarity, the universal brotherhood of man. I hope that while poli-
tics have been mentioned here—I am not one of those who, because
a man or woman disagrees with me, cannot act with them—I am
glad and proud to say I am too broad-minded to say they are a faker
or fool or a fraud because they disagree with me.
iww founding 253
My view may be narrow and theirs may be broad, but I do say to
those who have intimated politics here as being necessary or a part
of this organization, that I do not impute to them dishonesty or
impure motives. But as I understand the call for this convention,
politics had no place here; it was simply to be an economic organi-
zation, and I hope for the good of this organization that when we
go away from this hall, and our comrades go some to the west, some
to the east, some to the north, and some to the south, while some
remain in Chicago, and all spread this light over this broad land and
carry the message of what this convention has done, that there will
be no room for politics at all.
Th
ere may be room for politics—I have nothing to say about
that—but it is a bread-and-butter question, an economic issue, upon
which the fi ght must be made. Now, what do we mean when we say
revolutionary Socialist? We mean that the land shall belong to the
landless, the tools to the toiler, and the products to the producers.
Now, let us analyze that for just a moment, before you applaud me.
First, the land belongs to the landless. Is there a single landowner
in this country, who owns his land by the constitutional rights given
by the constitution of the United States, who will allow you to vote
it away from him? I am not such a fool as to believe it. We say,
“Th
e tools belong to the toiler.” Th
ey are owned by the capitalist
class. Do you believe they will allow you to go into the halls of
the legislature and simply say, “Be it enacted that on and after a
certain day the capitalist shall no longer own the tools and the fac-
tories and the places of industry, the ships that plow the ocean and
our lakes?”
Do you believe that they will submit? I do not. We say, “Th
e prod-
uct belongs to the producers.” It belongs to the capitalist class as
their legal property. Do you think that they will allow you to vote
them away from them by passing a law and saying, “Be it enacted
that on and after a certain day Mr. Capitalist shall be dispossessed?”
You may, but I do not believe it. Hence, when you roll under your
tongue the expression that you are revolutionists, remember what
that word means. It means a revolution that shall turn all these
things over where they belong—to the wealth producers.
Now, how shall the wealth producers come into possession of
them? I believe that if every man and every woman who works,
254 lucy
parsons
or who toils in the mines, the mills, the workshops, the fi elds, the
factories, and the farms in our broad America should decide in their
minds that they shall have that which of right belongs to them, and
that no idler shall live upon their toil, and when your new organiza-
tion, your economic organization, shall declare as man to man and
woman to woman, as brothers and sisters, that you are determined
that you will possess these things, then there is no army that is
large enough to overcome you, for you yourselves constitute the
army. Now, when you have decided that you will take possession of
these things, there will not need to be one gun fi red or one scaff old
erected.
You will simply come into your own, by your own independence
and your own manhood, and by asserting your own individual-
ity, and not sending any man to any legislature in any State of the
American Union to enact a law that you shall have what is your
own—yours by nature and by your manhood and by your very pres-
ence upon this Earth. Nature has been lavish to her children. She
has placed in this Earth all the material of wealth that is necessary
to make men and women happy. She has given us brains to go into
her storehouse and bring from its recesses all that is necessary. She
has given us these two hands and these brains to manufacture them
on a parallel with all other civilizations.
Th
ere is just one thing we lack, and we have only ourselves to
blame if we do not become free. We simply lack the intelligence to
take possession of that hope, and I feel that the men and women
who constitute a convention like this can come together and orga-
nize that intelligence. I feel that you will at least listen to me, and
maybe you will disagree with it.
I wish to say that my conception of the future method of tak-
ing possession of this Earth is that of the general strike; that is
my conception of it. Th
e trouble with all the strikes in the past has
been this: the workingmen, like the teamsters of our cities, these
hardworking teamsters, strike and go out and starve. Th
eir children
starve. Th
eir wives get discouraged. Some feel that they have to go
out and beg for relief, and to get a little coal to keep the children
warm, or a little bread to keep the wife from starving, or a little
something to keep the spark of life in them so that they can remain
wage slaves. Th
at is the way with the strikes in the past.
iww founding 255
My conception of the strike of the future is not to strike and go
out and starve, but to strike and remain in and take possession of the
necessary property of production. If anyone is to starve—I do not
say it is necessary—let it be the capitalist class. Th
ey have starved
us long enough, while they have had wealth and luxury and all that
is necessary. You men and women should be imbued with the spirit
that is now displayed in far-off Russia and far-off Siberia, where we
thought the spark of manhood and womanhood had been crushed
out of them. Let us take example from them.
We see the capitalist class fortifying themselves today behind
their Citizens’ Associations and Employers’ Associations in order
that they may crush the American labor movement. Let us cast our
eyes over to far-off Russia and take heart and courage from those
who are fi ghting the battle there, and from the further fact shown
in the dispatches that appear this morning in the news that carries
the greatest terror to the capitalist class throughout the world—the
emblem that has been the terror of all tyrants through all the ages,
and there you will see that the red fl ag has been raised.
According to the Tribune, the greatest terror is evinced in Odessa
and all through Russia because the red fl ag has been raised. Th
ey
know that where the red fl ag has been raised, whoever enroll them-
selves beneath that fl ag recognize the universal brotherhood of
man; they recognize that the red current that fl ows through the
veins of all humanity is identical, that the ideas of all humanity are
identical, that those who raise the red fl ag, it matters not where,
whether on the sunny plains of China or on the sun-beaten hills
of Africa or on the far-off snowcapped shores of the north, or in
Russia or America, that they all belong to the human family and
have an identity of interest. Th
at is what they know.
So when we come to decide, let us sink such diff erences as nation-
ality, religion, politics, and set our eyes eternally and forever towards
the rising star of the industrial republic of labor, remembering that
we have left the old behind and have set our faces toward the future.
Th
ere is no power on Earth that can stop men and women who are
determined to be free at all hazards. Th
ere is no power on Earth so
great as the power of intellect. It moves the world and it moves the
Earth.
Now, in conclusion, I wish to say to you—and you will excuse
256 lucy
parsons
me because of what I am going to say and only attribute it to my
interest in humanity. I wish to say that nineteen years ago on the
fourth of May of this year, I was one of those at a meeting at the
Haymarket in this city to protest against eleven workingmen being
shot to pieces at a factory in the southeastern part of this city
because they had dared to strike for the eight-hour movement that
was to be inaugurated in America in 1886.
Th
e Haymarket meeting was called primarily and entirely to
protest against the murder of comrades at the McCormick factory.
When that meeting was nearing its close someone threw a bomb.
No one knows to this day who threw it except the man who threw
it. Possibly he has rendered his account with nature and has passed
away. But no human being alive knows who threw it. And yet in the
soil of Illinois, the soil that gave a Lincoln to America, the soil in
which the great, magnifi cent Lincoln was buried, in the State that
was supposed to be the most liberal in the union, fi ve men sleep
the last sleep in Waldheim under a monument that has been raised
there because they dared to raise their voices for humanity. I say to
any of you who are here and can do so, it is well worth your time
to go out there and draw some inspiration around the graves of the
fi rst martyrs who fell in the great industrial struggle for liberty on
American soil.
I say to you that even within the sound of my voice, only two
short blocks from where we meet today, the scaff old was erected
on which those fi ve men paid the penalty for daring to raise their
voices against the iniquities of the age in which we live.
We are assembled here for the same purpose. And do any of
you older men remember the telegrams that were sent out from
Chicago while our comrades were not yet even cut down from the
cruel gallows?
“Anarchy is dead, and these miscreants have been put out of the
way.”
Oh, friends, I am sorry that I even had to use that word, anar-
chy, just now in your presence, which was not in my mind at the
outset.
So if any of you wish to go out there and look at this monu-
ment that has been raised by those who believed in their comrades’
innocence and sincerity, I will ask you, when you have gone out
iww founding 257
and looked at the monument, that you will go to the reverse side
of the monument and [read] there on the reverse side the words of
a man, himself the purest and the noblest man who ever sat in the
gubernatorial chair of the State of Illinois, John P. Altgeld. On that
monument you will read the clause of his message in which he par-
doned the men who were lingering then in [prison in] Joliet.
I have nothing more to say. I ask you to read the words of Altgeld,
who was at that time the governor, and had been a lawyer and a
judge, and knew whereof he spoke, and then take out your copy-
books and copy the words of Altgeld when he released those who
had not been slaughtered at the capitalists’ behest, and then take
them home and change your minds about what those men were put
to death for.
Now, I have taken up your time in this because I simply feel that
I have a right as a mother, and as the wife of one of those sacrifi ced
men, to say whatever I can to bring the light to bear upon this
conspiracy and to show you the way it was. Now, I thank you for
the time that I have taken up of yours. I hope that we will meet
again some time, you and I, in some hall where we can meet and
organize the wageworkers of America, the men and women, so that
the children may not go into the factories, nor the women into the
factories, unless they go under proper conditions.
I hope even now to live to see the day when the fi rst dawn of the
new era will have arisen, when capitalism will be a thing of the past,
and the new industrial republic, the commonwealth of labor, shall
be in operation. I thank you.
June 29, 1905
258 lucy
parsons
Acknowledgments
Th
anks to Audrea Lim for assembling and presenting the texts by
Marx, Lincoln and others. Th
e writings of both Karl Marx and
Abraham Lincoln are voluminous and available in many forms.
Th
ose reprinted here are just a small sample to explain the onset
and course of the Civil War in the United States. To these we
have added a few writings by others who contributed to America’s
postwar social radicalization, but without attempting to duplicate
the extensive and important documentation of the black experience
of the war or of Reconstruction.
All the Lincoln speeches can be found on the US Library of
Congress website, www.loc.gov.
Marx’s “Th
e North American Civil War” and “Th
e Civil War in
the United States” were taken from Marx’s Political Writings,
Volume 2, Surveys From Exile (Verso, 2010). Th
e remaining arti-
cles in the “Karl Marx” section were taken from Karl Marx &
Frederick Engels’ Th
e Civil War in the United States (International
Publishers, 1861).
Th
e “Letter from Marx to Annenkov” was taken from Marx
Engels Collected Works, Volume 38 (International Publishers,
1975). Th
e remaining letters were taken from Karl Marx &
Frederick Engels’ Th
e Civil War in the United States (International
Publishers, 1969).
“Independence vs. Dependence! Which?” is from Woodhull &
Clafi n’s Weekly, June 25, 1870; “Th
e Rights of Children” is from
Woodhull & Clafi n’s Weekly, December 6, 1870; and “Interview
with Karl Marx” is from Woodhull & Clafi n’s Weekly, August 12,
1871, all on microfi che.
Th
omas Fortune’s “Conclusion” to Black and White was taken
from Th
omas Fortune, Black and White (Washington Square
Press, 2007).
Engels’ “Preface to the US Edition” was taken from Fredriech
Engels, Th
e Condition of the Working Class in England (Oxford
University Press, 1999).
Lucy Parson’s “Speeches at the Founding Convention of the
Industrial Workers of the World” was taken from Lucy Parsons,
Freedom, Equality & Solidarity (Charles H. Kerr, 2004).
260 acknowledgments
Dostları ilə paylaş: |