5
8 □ 10,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS
states, and also on the impact of exterior forces on the formation of expres-
sion. There may be a greater or lesser number of intermediate states
between the molecular and the molar; there may be a greater or lesser num-
ber of exterior forces or organizing centers participating in the molar form.
Doubtless, these two factors are in an inverse relation to each other and
indicate limit-cases. For example, the molar form of expression may be of
the "mold" type, mobilizing a maximum of exterior forces; or it may be of
the "modulation" type, bringing into play only a minimum number of
them. Even in the case of the mold, however, there are nearly instantane-
ous, interior intermediate states between the molecular content that
assumes its own specific forms and the determinate molar expression of
the outside by the form of the mold. Conversely, even when the multiplica-
tion and temporalization of the intermediate states testify to the endo-
genous character of the molar form (as with crystals), a minimum of
exterior forces still intervene in each of the stages.
19
We must therefore say
that the relative independence of content and expression, the real distinc-
tion between molecular content and molar expression with their respective
forms, has a special status enjoying a certain amount of latitude between
the limit-cases.
Since strata are judgments of God, one should not hesitate to apply all
the subtleties of medieval Scholasticism and theology. There is a real dis-
tinction between content and expression because the corresponding forms
are effectively distinct in the "thing" itself, and not only in the mind of the
observer. But this real distinction is quite special; it is only formal since the
two forms compose or shape a single thing, a single stratified subject. Vari-
ous examples of formal distinction can be cited: between scales or orders of
magnitude (as between a map and its model; or, in a different fashion,
between the micro- and macrophysical levels, as in the parable of
Eddington's two offices); between the various states or formal reasons
through which a thing passes; between the thing in one form, and as
affected by a possibly exterior causality giving it a different form; and so
forth. (There is a proliferation of distinct forms because, in addition to
content and expression each having its own forms, intermediate states
introduce forms of expression proper to content and forms of content
proper to expression.)
As diverse and real as formal distinctions are, on the organic stratum the
very nature of the distinction changes.
As a result, the entire distribution
between content and expression is different. The organic stratum never-
theless preserves, and even amplifies, the relation between the molecular
and the molar, with all kinds of intermediate states. We saw this in the case
of morphogenesis, where double articulation is inseparable from a com-
munication between two orders of magnitude. The same thing applies to
1
0,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS D 59
cellular chemistry. But the organic stratum has a unique character that
must account for the amplifications. In
a preceding discussion, expression
was dependent upon the expressed molecular content in all directions and
in every dimension and had independence only to the extent that it
appealed to a higher order of magnitude and to exterior forces: The real dis-
tinction was between forms, but forms belonging to the same aggregate, the
same thing or subject. Now, however, expression becomes independent in its
own right, in other words, autonomous. Before, the coding of a stratum was
coextensive with that stratum; on the organic stratum, on the other hand, it
takes place on an autonomous and independent line that detaches as much
as possible from the second and third dimensions. Expression ceases to be
voluminous or superficial, becoming linear, unidimensional (even in its
segmentarity). The essential thing is the linearity of the nucleic sequence.
20
The real distinction between content and expression, therefore, is not sim-
ply formal. It is strictly speaking real, and passes into the molecular, with-
out regard to order of magnitude. It is between two classes of molecules,
nucleic acids of expression and proteins of content, nucleic elements or
nucleotides and protein elements or amino acids. Both expression and
content are now molecular and molar. The distinction no longer concerns a
single aggregate or subject; linearity takes us further in the direction of flat
multiplicities, rather than unity. Expression involves nucleotides and
nucleic acids as well as molecules that, in their substance and form, are
entirely independent not only of molecules of content but of any directed
action in the exterior milieu. Thus invariance is a characteristic of certain
molecules and is not found exclusively on the molar scale. Conversely, pro-
teins, in their substance and form of content, are equally independent of
nucleotides: the only thing univocally determined is that one amino acid
rather than another corresponds to a sequence of three nucleotides.
2
' What
the linear form of expression determines is therefore a derivative form of
expression, one that is relative to content and that, through a folding back
upon itself of the protein sequence of the amino acids, finally yields the
characteristic three-dimensional structures. In short, what is specific to the
organic stratum is this alignment of expression, this exhaustion or detach-
ment of a line of expression, this reduction of form and substance of expres-
sion to a unidimensional line, guaranteeing their reciprocal independence
from content without having to account for orders of magnitude.
This has many consequences. The new configuration of expression and
content conditions not only the organism's power to reproduce but also its
power to deterritorialize or accelerate deterritorialization. The alignment
of the code or linearity of the nucleic sequence in fact marks a threshold of
deterritorialization of the "sign" that gives it a new ability to be copied and
makes the organism more deterritorialized than a crystal: only something