5
6 □ 10,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS
matter on the plane of consistency. In a certain sense, the acceleration of
relative deterritorializations reaches the sound barrier: if the particles
bounce off this wall, or allow themselves to be captured by black holes, they
fall back onto the strata, into the strata's relations and milieus; but if they
cross the barrier they reach the unformed, destratified element of the plane
of consistency. We may even say the the abstract machines that emit and
combine particles have two very different modes of existence: the Ecumenon
and the Planomenon. Either the abstract machines remain prisoner to
stratifications, are enveloped in a certain specific stratum whose program
or unity of composition they define (the abstract Animal, the abstract
chemical Body, Energy in itself) and whose movements of relative
deterritorialization they regulate, Or, on the contrary, the abstract machine
cuts across all stratifications, develops alone and in its own right on the
plane of consistency whose diagram it constitutes, the same machine at
work in astrophysics and in microphysics, in the natural and in the artifi-
cial, piloting flows of absolute deterritorialization (in no sense, of course, is
unformed matter chaos of any kind). But this presentation is still too
simplified.
First, one does not go from the relative to the absolute simply by acceler-
ation, even though increases in speed tend to have this comparative and
global result. Absolute deterritorialization is not defined as a giant acceler-
ator; its absoluteness does not hinge on how fast it goes. It is actually possi-
ble to reach the absolute by way of phenomena of relative slowness or delay.
Retarded development is an example. What qualifies a deterritorialization
is not its speed (some are very slow) but its nature, whether it constitutes
epistrata and parastrata and proceeds by articulated segments or, on the
contrary, jumps from one singularity to another following a
nondecom-posable, nonsegmentary line drawing a metastratum of the plane
of consistency. Second, under no circumstances must it be thought that
absolute deterritorialization comes suddenly of afterward, is in excess or
beyond. That would preclude any understanding of why the strata
themselves are animated by movements of relative deterritorialization and
decoding that are not like accidents occurring on them. In fact, what is
primary is an absolute deterritorialization an absolute line of flight,
however complex or multiple—that of the plane of consistency or body
without organs (the Earth, the absolutely deterritorialized). This absolute
deterritorialization becomes relative only after stratification occurs on
that plane or body: It is the strata that are always residue, not the
opposite. The question is not how something manages to leave the strata
by how things get into them in the first place. There is a perpetual
immanence of absolute deterritorialization within relative
deterritorialization; and the machinic assemblages between strata that
regulate the differential relations and relative
1
0,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS □ 57
movements also have cutting edges of deterritorialization oriented toward
the absolute. The plane of consistency is
always immanent to the strata; the
two states of the abstract machine always coexist as two different states of
intensities.
Most of the audience had left (the first to go were the Marinetians with
their double articulation, followed by the Hjelmslevians with their content
and expression, and the biologists with their proteins and nucleic acids).
The only ones left were the mathematicians, accustomed to other follies,
along with a few astrologers, archaeologists, and scattered individuals.
Challenger, moreover, had changed since the beginning of his talk. His
voice had become hoarser, broken occasionally by an apish cough. His
dream was not so much to give a lecture to humans as to provide a program
for pure computers. Or else he was dreaming of an axiomatic, for
axi-omatics deals essentially with stratification. Challenger was
addressing himself to memory only. Now that we had discussed what was
constant and what varied in a stratum from the standpoint of substances
and forms, the question remaining to be answered was what varied
between strata from the standpoint of content and expression. For if it is
true that there is always a real distinction constitutive of double
articulation, a reciprocal presupposition of content and expression, then
what varies from one stratum to another is the nature of this real
distinction, and the nature and respective positions of the terms
distinguished. Let us start with a certain group of strata that can be
characterized summarily as follows: on these strata, content (form and
substance) is molecular, and expression (form and substance) is molar.
The difference between the two is primarily one of order of magnitude or
scale. Resonance, or the communication occurring between the two
independent orders, is what institutes the stratified system. The molecular
content of that system has its own form corresponding to the distribution
of elemental masses and the action of one molecule upon another;
similarly, expression has a form manifesting the statistical aggregate and
state of equilibrium existing on the macroscopic level. Expression is like
an "operation of amplifying structuration carrying the active properties of
the originally microphysical discontinuity to the macrophysical level."
We took as our point of departure cases of this kind on the geological
stratum, the crystalline stratum, and physicochemical strata, wherever the
molar can be said to express microscopic molecular interactions ("the crys-
tal is the macroscopic expression of a microscopic structure"; the "crystal-
line form expresses certain atomic or molecular characteristics of the
constituent chemical categories"). Of course, this still leaves numerous
possibilities, depending on the number and nature of the intermediate