4
8 □ 10,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS
understood increasingly in terms of populations, packs and colonies,
collectivities or multiplicities; and degrees of development in terms of
speeds, rates, coefficients, and differential relations. A double deepening.
This, Darwinism's fundamental contribution, implies a new coupling of
individuals and milieus on the stratum.
8
First, if we assume the presence of an elementary or even molecular pop-
ulation in a given milieu, the forms do not preexist the population, they are
more like statistical results. The more a population assumes divergent
forms, the more its multiplicity divides into multiplicities of different
nature, the more its elements form distinct compounds or matters—the
more efficiently it distributes itself in the milieu, or divides up the milieu.
Thus the relationship between embryogenesis and phylogenesis is
reversed: the embryo does not testify to an absolute form preestablished in
a closed milieu; rather, the phylogenesis of populations has at its disposal,
in an open milieu, an entire range of relative forms to choose from, none of
which is preestablished. In embryogenesis, "It is possible to tell from the
parents, anticipating the outcome of the process, whether a pigeon or a wolf
is developing.... But here the points of reference themselves are in
motion: there are only fixed points for convenience of expression. At the
level of universal evolution, it is impossible to discern that kind of refer-
ence point.... Life on earth appears as a sum of relatively independent
species of flora and fauna with sometimes shifting or porous boundaries
between them. Geographical areas can only harbor a sort of chaos, or, at
best, extrinsic harmonies of an ecological order, temporary equilibriums
between populations."
9
Second, simultaneously and under the same conditions, the degrees are
not degrees of preexistent development or perfection but are instead global
and relative equilibriums: they enter into play as a function of the advan-
tage they give particular elements, then a particular multiplicity in the
milieu, and as a function of a particular variation in the milieu. Degrees are
no longer measured in terms of increasing perfection or a differentiation
and increase in the complexity of the parts, but in terms of differential rela-
tions and coefficients such as selective pressure, catalytic action, speed of
propagation, rate of growth, evolution, mutation, etc. Relative progress,
then, can occur by formal and quantitative simplification rather than by
complication, by a loss of components and syntheses rather than by acqui-
sition (it is a question of speed, and speed is a differential). It is through
populations that one is formed, assumes forms, and through loss that one
progresses and picks up speed. Darwinism's two fundamental contribu-
tions move in the direction of a science of multiplicities: the substitution of
populations for types, and the substitution of rates or differential relations
for degrees.
10
These are nomadic contributions with shifting boundaries
1
0,000 B.C.: THE GEOLOGY OF MORALS □ 49
determined by populations or variations of multiplicities, and with differ-
ential coefficients or variations of relations. Contemporary biochemistry,
or "molecular Darwinism" as Monod calls it, confirms, on the level of a
single statistical and global individual, or a simple sample, the decisive
importance of molecular populations and microbiological rates (for exam-
ple, the endlessness of the sequence composing a chain, and the chance var-
iation of a single segment in the sequence).
Challenger admitted having digressed at length but added that there was
no possible way to distinguish between the digressive and the
nondi-gressive. The point was to arrive at several conclusions
concerning the unity and diversity of a single stratum, in this case the
organic stratum.
To begin with, a stratum does indeed have a unity of composition, which
is
what allows it to be called a stratum: molecular materials, substantial ele-
ments, and formal relations or traits. Materials are not the same as the
unformed matter of the plane of consistency; they are already stratified,
and come from "substrata." But of course substrata should not be thought
of only as substrata: in particular, their organization is no less complex
than, nor is it inferior to, that of the strata; we should be on our guard
against any kind of ridiculous cosmic evolutionism. The materials fur-
nished by a substratum are no doubt simpler than the compounds of a stra-
tum, but their level of organization in the substratum is no lower than that
of the stratum itself. The difference between materials and substantial ele-
ments is one of organization; there is a change in organization, not an aug-
mentation. The materials furnished by the substratum constitute an
exterior milieu for the elements and compounds of the stratum under con-
sideration, but they are not exterior to the stratum. The elements and com-
pounds constitute an interior of the stratum, just as the materials
constitute an exterior of the stratum; both belong to the stratum, the latter
because they are materials that have been furnished to the stratum and
selected for it, the former because they are formed from the materials.
Once again, this exterior and interior are relative; they exist only through
their exchanges and therefore only by virtue of the stratum responsible for
the relation between them. For example, on a crystalline stratum, the
amorphous milieu, or medium, is exterior to the seed before the crystal has
formed; the crystal forms by interiorizing and incorporating masses of
amorphous material. Conversely, the interiority of the seed of the crystal
must move out to the system's exterior, where the amorphous medium can
crystallize (the aptitude to switch over to the other form of organization).
To the point that the seed itself comes from the outside. In short, both exte-
rior and interior are interior to the stratum. The same applies to the organic
stratum: the materials furnished by the substrata are an exterior medium
constituting the famous prebiotic soup, and catalysts play the role of seed