204
Russia. According to the first group, which consisted mainly of Chechens, the
attitude towards Russia should be hardened, even secession should be considered.
Dudayev, representing the first group suggested that the Confederation should set
up a committee to investigate and judge the leaders of the North Caucasian
republics where Russia had been allowed to send troops. This committee should
even have the right to pass death sentences on them. The other group, including
Shanibov and most of the Abkhaz were defended more moderate policies.
517
In
contrast to Dudayev, Denga Khalidov, the first deputy chairman of the
Confederation, told the congress that they would need at least 10 years to form a
true Caucasian confederation. During that period, a federal treaty should be signed
with Russia and all North Caucasian republics. Dagestan and Abkhazia should also
sign a similar treaty. During that period, the Confederation would form its own
political system and begin to play a role in international politics. Khalidov, in
addition, stated that the political structure of the Confederation would be “identical
to that of the common European home”. Due account would be taken of the
different character of the regions, and in international politics it would act as the
legal successor to the Mountain Republic which existed in the Caucasus in 1918. In
case official state structures in Caucasian republics pursued policies contradicting
the republics’ ‘common interests’; the Confederation might organize acts of civil
disobedience, and “use other means of political struggle”.
518
516
“North Caucasus Regional Movements’ Leaders in Conflict,” FBIS-USR-93-114, 22-23, 1
September 1993.
517
Şanibe, “Yeniden doğuş,” 44.
518
“Congress of Confederation of Mountain Peoples in Groznyy,” SWB SU/1504, C1/1, 6 October
1992.
205
Although the majority of participants defended the first approach, most of
the leading cadre supported the second, and managed to maintain a moderate line.
In the final declaration, the Confederation advised all socio-political organizations
and movements to demand that the leaders of their republics seek real
independence and, conclude treaties on political, economic and cultural
cooperation between one another. Moreover, the formation of a joint regional
security forces run along the lines of the national guard. In the event that the
leaders of the republics rejected these measures, the Confederation threatened to
organise peaceful actions of mass protest and civil disobedience to demand that the
unpopular leadership resign and that elections to republican parliaments be
organized ahead of schedule.
After the Congress, Shanibov blamed ‘the third force’ without naming it.
He went on to say that he appreciated Dudayev’s achievements in reviving national
consciousness throughout the Caucasus, nevertheless he also stressed, “we are
unanimous on global issues but somewhat differ on tactics, which manifest itself,
inter alia, in the approach to the Russian-Caucasian mutual relations.”
519
“Chechnia has today become the flagship of freedom in the region”, he said, but,
the other 15 peoples within the Confederation should for the time being link their
future with Russia.
Within the same days, especially after the outbreak of armed conflicts in the
region Moscow was faced with the question of how to address regional disputes.
519
“Shanibov calls for Unification of the Caucasus within Russian Federation,” SWB SU/1504,
C1/2, 6 October.
206
The Russian Federation Security Council set up a special Inter-regional
Commission on the North Caucasus which was given the task of looking for ethnic,
psychological and legal solutions to conflicts arising in the region that threaten
Russia’s security of state and society.
520
In addition to representatives from the
Russian ministries of security, defence, finance, and economy, the then Russian
Minister of Justice, Nikolay Fyodorov also took part in the commission as a deputy
chairman. By this commission Yeltsin wanted a way of dealing with the region
directly.
The Security Council’s Committee produced two reports entitled ‘The
Current Ethno-political Situation in the North Caucasus and the Path Toward its
Stabilization,’ and ‘The Conception of Russian Nationalities Policy in the North
Caucasus’. Both of reports singled out ‘national separatism’ on the part of the
Confederation and the national movements in the republics as the root of all
problems in the North Caucasus.
The first report recommended that, instead of working with the new
political forces such as the Confederation and other national movements, Moscow
establish alternative organizations in the North Caucasus. The separatist urges of
the nationalist movements could only be overcome if Moscow concentrated its
efforts on increasing the popularity of as many pro-Russian socio-political groups
in the region as possible.
The second report, which outlined the tenets of Russia’s policy toward the
region, affirmed that assisting the creation and growth in popularity of pro-Russian
520
Vladimir Lysenko, then Deputy Head of the Ministry for Nationalities and Regional Policy, and
later the Chairman of the Russian Duma Subcommittee on Federal Relations was heading this
Dostları ilə paylaş: |