Technical Note
15
FIGURE EX2-3 DEFLECTED SHAPE WITH ALLOWANCE FOR CRACKING,
USING SIMPLIFIED METHOD.
Using Equivalent Moment of Inertia (Ie) Combined with Numerical Integration
The next step in increased accuracy of deflection calculation is (i) the use of equivalent moment
of inertia Ie, (ii) the strip method as outlined in the preceding example, and (iii) numerical
integration. In this scheme each span will be subdivided in a number of segments, typically 10
to 20 divisions. The equivalent moment of inertia for each division will be calculated separately,
and a solution obtained with recognition of a variable moment of inertia along the length of each
span. This procedure along with a detailed numerical example is described in ADAPT TN294
Figure 3 is an example showing the variation of moment along the first span of a two-span
member, subdivision of the span into smaller segments, and the equivalent moment of inertia
for each segment due to cracking.
Using the computer program ADAPT-RC, the above procedure is employed to determine the
deflection of the design strip shown in Fig, 4, with due consideration for cracking. The calculated
deflection by the program is 0.235 in (5.97 mm), compared to 0.264 in (6.71 mm) where the
simplified averaging of effective moment of inertia was used in calculation of cracked deflection.
Using this method, the total deflection is estimated as:
Total deflection = 2 * 0.235 = 0.470 in. (11.94 mm)
Technical Note
16
FIGURE 3 VARIABLE MOMENT INERTIA ALONG A
MEMBER DUE TO CRACKING
FIUGRE 4 DEFLECTED PROFILE OF THE DESIGN STRIP WITH ALLOWANCE
FOR CRACKING USING NUMERICAL INTEGRATION
Technical Note
17
Using Finite Element Method With No Allowance for Cracking
Using finite element method (FEM), the salient features of the geometry and loading that are
idealized in other previously explained options can be faithfully modeled. This leads to a more
valid estimate of slab deflection. Figure 5 shows the Discretization of the floor system used in
the previous examples into finite element cells.
FIGURE 5 DISCRETIZATION OF THE TYPICAL FLOOR SLAB FOR FINITE
ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FLOOR-PRO)
EXAMPLE
For the same geometry and parameters of examples 1 and 2, using a finite element program
determine the deflection at center of the panel identified in Fig. EX1-1.
ADAPT-FLOOR Pro
4
program was used to model the slab and obtain a solution. The
distribution of deflection for the given load is shown in Fig. EX3-1. The maximum deflection at
the center of the panel under consideration is reported as 0.54 in.
4
ADAPT-Floor Pro is a finite element program for analysis and design of conventionally reinforced or post-
tensioned floor systems. www.adaptsoft.com
Technical Note
18
FIGURE EX3-1 DEFLECTION CONTOUR OF THE FLOOR SYSTEM UNDER THE COMBINED
ACTION OF DEAD AND LIVE LOADS
Using Finite Element Method With Due Allowance for Cracking
Formulation of finite elements with allowance for cracking is somewhat complex. The complexity
arises from the fact that cracking and reduction in stiffness depend on the presence, amount
and orientation of reinforcement. Before a solution is obtained, the reinforcement detailing of a
floor system must be fully known, since the loss of stiffness in each finite element cell depends
on the availability and exact location of the reinforcement in that cell.
The following briefly describes the steps for a finite element deflection calculation, with
allowance for cracking.
1. Using the geometry, boundary conditions, material properties, and the load combination for
which the deflection is sought, the program discretizes the structure, sets up the system
stiffness matrix of the structure based on gross moment of inertia (Ig), and obtains the
distribution of moments (Ma) over the entire structure.
2. If required the program performs a design check, using a building code, and adds the
required reinforcement to the floor system for the specified loads.
3. The Program scans the entire floor system to detect the reinforcement available in the
beams and the slab regions. The available reinforcement is either determined by the
Program prior to the initiation of deflection calculation, or is a combination of program calculated
and user defined/edited reinforcement.
Once the deflection calculation is initiated, the available reinforcement remains unchanged. The
reinforcement can be in one or more of the following forms, with no restriction on the orientation,
length, or the position of each reinforcement within the floor system.
a - User defined one or more top and bottom reinforcement mesh;
b -. User defined grouped or distributed reinforcement bars at top and/or bottom of