Technical Note
3
One-Way Conventionally Reinforced Slabs and Beams
TABLE 2 MINIMUM THICKNESS OF CONVENTIONALLY
REINFORCED BEAMS OR ONE-WAY SLABS
Member
Simply
supported
One end
continuous
Both ends
continuous
Cantilever
Solid one-way slabs
L/20
L/24
L/28
L/10
Beams or ribbed
one-way slabs
L/16 L/18.5 L/21
L/8
Notes:
L =span length
Values given shall be used directly for members with normal weight concrete and
Grade 60 ksi (400 MPa) reinforcement. For other conditions, the values shall be
modified as follows:
a) For lightweight concrete having equilibrium density, wc, in the range of 90 to
115 lb/ft
3
(1440-1840 kg/m
3
), the values shall be multiplied by (1.65-0.005 wc)
but not less than 1.09 [in SI units, (1.65-0.003
γ
c
) but not less than 1, where
γ
c
is
the density in kg/m
3
].
b) For fy other than 60,000 psi(400 MPa), the values
shall be multiplied by
(0.4+fy/100,000) [in SI units (0.4+fy/670)].
Two-Way Conventionally Reinforced Slabs and Beams
TABLE 3 MINIMUM THICKNESS OF SLABS WITHOUT INTERIOR BEAMS*
fy
psi**
Without drop panels***
With drop panels***
Exterior panels
Interior
panels
Exterior panels
Interior
panels
Without
edge
beams
With
edge
beams****
Without
edge beams
With
edge
beams****
40,000 Ln/33
Ln/36
Ln/36
Ln/36
Ln/40 Ln/40
60,000 Ln/30
Ln/33
Ln/33
Ln/33
Ln/36 Ln/36
75,000 Ln/28
Ln/31
Ln/31
Ln/31
Ln/34 Ln/34
Notes:
* For two-way construction, Ln is the length of clear span in the long direction, measured face-to-face
of supports in slabs without beams and face-to-face of beams or other supports in other cases.
** For fy between the values given in the table, minimum thickness shall be determined by linear
interpolation.
*** Drop panels are defined as extension of slab thickening into span not less than span/6, and
extension
of thickening below slab not less than slab thickness/4.
Technical Note
4
**** Slabs with beams between columns along exterior edges. The ratio
of edge beam stiffness to
the stiffness of the edge beam’s design strip shall not be less than 0.44
Post-Tensioned Members
For post-tensioned beams and slabs, the recommended values by the Post-Tensioning Institute [PTI,
1990 are as follows:
TABLE 4 RECOMMENED SPAN TO DEPTH RATIOS FOR
POST-TENSIONED MEMBERS
Continuous
Spans
Simple
Spans
Roof Floor Roof Floor
One-way solid slabs
50 45 45 40
Two-way solid slabs (supported
on columns only)
45-48 40-45
Two-way waffle slabs (1m pans)
40 35 35 30
Beams
35 30 30 26
One-way joists
42 38 38 35
Note: The above ratios may be increased if calculations verify that
deflection, camber, and vibrations are not objectionable.
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS
Under otherwise unchanged conditions, the deformation of an exposed and loaded concrete member
continues to increase. The increase is due to creep under applied load and shrinkage from loss of
moisture. The engineering approach to estimating of deflection is to determine the instantaneous
response of a structure under an applied load, and magnify the instantaneous displacement due to the
time-dependent factors of creep and shrinkage. With time, the rate of change in displacement reduces.
For building structure it is assumed that five years is sufficient time for the deflections to have reached
their final values. While it is practical to calculate the time-dependent deflection for any time interval,
the common practice is to estimate the total value at five years and use this value in the design.
Instantaneous Deflection
Instantaneous deflection is generally calculated using concrete’s modulus of elasticity at 28 days,
gross-cross sectional area and linear elastic theory. The calculated deflection may require adjustment,
if the member is likely to crack, when subjected to the design load. Cracking reduces the stiffness of a
member and results in increased deflection. The options for calculating instantaneous deflection with
due allowance to cracking are:
Closed form formulas or tables, available primarily for uncracked sections;
Use of equivalent moment of inertia (Ie) and simplified averaging (ACI-318’s
simplified
procedure);
Use of equivalent moment of inertia (Ie) combined with numerical integration; and
Use of Finite Element floor programs that allow for cracking.
Each of the above procedures is briefly discussed in the following section.