8
Persona Non Grata: Expulsions of Civilians from Israeli-Occupied Lebanon
and women has literally forced them to flee
their villages out of fear, political
principle, and often a combination of both. While most of these individuals
described themselves to Human Rights Watch as “expelled,” we have
distinguished these individuals who have fled the territory from those expelled or
otherwise forcibly transferred.
The SLA practice of forced conscription of teenaged boys who live in
the zone has also been a long-standing nightmare for families who are opposed
to the occupation and despise Israel’s surrogate militia. Some families moved out
of the zone on their own initiative to ensure that their sons would not be forced
into SLA service. Others stayed in their villages but sent their
sons out when they
reached fourteen or fifteen years of age. According to testimony, children have
been forcibly pressed into service. “They take them at fourteen, fifteen, and
sixteen years old,” said a woman from the village of Markaba, whose own son
was forcibly conscripted at sixteen. She told Human Rights Watch that a
neighbor’s son was forcibly taken at fourteen.
Farmers and other residents who earned their livelihoods in the occupied
zone also recounted massive corruption within the top ranks of the occupation
security
apparatus, in the form of arbitrary “taxes” on business purchases,
harvests, and other income. Some families also said that they directly paid cash to
SLA security officials to secure the release of sons from the militia or to ensure
that these young men and boys would be spared conscription. By several
first-hand accounts, militiamen who conducted searches of residents’ homes also
“confiscated” — looted — cash, gold, and vehicles, resulting in losses equivalent
to thousands of U.S. dollars.
Despite the omnipresent stress, residents who
remained in the zone were
determined to educate their children, farm the land, maintain local jobs as
Lebanese government employees, and manage small, private businesses in their
villages. These men and women who did not flee used their own savings, and the
money provided by family members who worked abroad or in Beirut and other
Lebanese cities, to invest in their homes, agricultural land,
and enterprises in the
zone. It is in this broader context that the punishing consequences of any family’s
expulsion and permanent dispossession should be understood.
The Israeli Role in the Occupied Zone
The Israeli-occupied zone, which borders Israel and comprises about 10
percent of Lebanese territory, has within it over one hundred villages and towns in
the south of the country. The zone's current boundaries took shape in 1985, when
the Israeli military withdrew in stages from areas of Lebanon that its troops had
occupied to the north, following Israel's invasion of the country in June 1982.
After Israel's invasion in March 1978, the U.N. Security Council adopted
Summary 9
Resolution 425, which called upon Israel "immediately to cease its military action
against Lebanese territorial integrity and withdraw forthwith its forces from all
Lebanese territory." The resolution remains in force.
The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) maintain a
headquarters in a former
Lebanese army barracks in the town of Marjayoun, inside the zone. An Israeli
flag, with Lebanese flags on either side of it, flies atop the group of buildings in
which the barracks is located. Heavily fortified IDF military positions throughout
the zone, strategically located on the highest hilltops, such as the position at the
imposing Crusader-era Beaufort Castle which towers above the village of
Arnoun, also fly Israeli flags. "We have thousands of soldiers and officers doing
the
day-to-day work in Lebanon, risking their lives," then-Israeli defense minister
Moshe Arens told the
Jerusalem Post in March 1999.
Israel controls the occupied zone with its own military and security
forces as well as with those of its auxiliary militia, the South Lebanon Army
(SLA). The SLA, while composed of Lebanese recruits,
is armed and financed
directly by Israel. Successive Israeli governments have persistently argued that,
while Israel coordinates with and has influence over SLA, the militia is
autonomous and Israel is not responsible for the SLA’s conduct in the zone, such
as the operation of the notorious Khiam prison and the torture of detainees there.
The international community takes a different view. In twice-yearly reports to
the U.N. Security Council, the U.N. secretary-general does not even mention the
SLA by name. Rather, the militia has been consistently described in these
reports as “de facto forces” and named as the “local Lebanese auxiliary” of the
IDF. It is in part through the deployment and use of the
SLA as its surrogate that
Israel has maintained the occupation. The IDF Liaison Unit to Lebanon,
commanded by an Israeli military officer with the rank of brigadier general,
reportedly directs Israeli and SLA military activities in the occupied zone.
In April 1998, the government of then-prime minister Benjamin
Netanyahu acknowledged "IDF control" over the territory that Israel occupies in
southern Lebanon. On April 1, 1998, the Israeli Ministerial Committee for
National Security announced that Israel was accepting U.N. Resolution 425 "so
that the IDF will leave Lebanon," and called on the Lebanese government "to
begin negotiations...to restore its effective control over territories
currently under
IDF control..." (italics added). Israeli officials continue to evade accountability
for the actions of the IDF's Lebanese auxiliaries
in the occupied zone, however,
and to maintain that Israeli influence falls short of "effective control." This
notwithstanding, Human Rights Watch shares the view of the international
community that Israel is the Occupying Power in the Lebanese territory it refers to
as its “security zone,” and is ultimately responsible for its own actions and those
of its local Lebanese auxiliary there.