Preface to the lecture, 1

56

 

electron as an elementary vortex

 

 

 

Fig. 4.3:        Elementarv particles as configurations of 

potential 

vortices 

---

Properties _______________________________________________________________ 57

 

4.3 Derivation of the electron as an elementary vortex

 

The next key question necessarily has to be brought to a conclusive answer to save the 

principle of causality, so that we no longer have to postulate an own physics with its own 

laws for the microcosm:

 

III. Why do these particles show as monopoles?

 

More concrete the question has to read:

 

Where is the positive pole in a negatively charged electron, if it should be an electric

 

dipole?

 

The only possible answer is:

 

In the centre of the particle!

 

Thus in the centre of the electron its positive pole is hidden and in the centre of the 

positron its negative pole is hidden. But we only observe these particles from the outside 

and for reason of the field conditions of the electron we measure a negative charge and for 

its antiparticle, the positron, a positive charge. If in each case we wanted to measure the 

electric fields included in the inside, we had to destroy the particle. Then a proof would 

not be possible anymore.

 

Here also a persistent mistake is eliminated by the for a long time known axiom that 

monopoles can not exist at all if one considers continuity! By means of technical-physical 

experiments this axiom is sufficiently secured.

 

The quantum physical approach is standing on uncertain ground if it is postulated that 

other laws of nature should apply to particle physics, if a second approach, the field- 

theoretical approach, is conceivable that does not know these problems!

 

The discussed concentration effect gives the potential vortex a structure shaping property. 

With that also the fourth key question can be answered:

 

IV. Why do the particles have the form of spheres?

 

The potential vortex is favoured in the particle-free vacuum of the microcosm because of

 

the missing  conductivity. In connection with the  concentration effect the following 

conclusion can be drawn:

 

The extremely mighty potential vortex exerts a high pressure on the microcosm and on 

each particle.

 

With that also the fourth key question, why stable elementary particles are spherical, can

 

be answered by the potential vortex theory:

 

Only the sphere is able to withstand a high outside pressure.

 

All other forms, like e.g. dipoles formed like a rod or a club would be instable in the 

presence of the extremely concentrating potential vortex.  They would be immediately 

destroyed by the pressure of the potential vortex. 

---

58

 

quanta as field vortices

 

I.     Why are there no magnetically charged 

particles?

 

(the vacuum has no conductivity!) 

II.   Why are there only electrically charged 

particles?

 

(in the vacuum only potential vortices can exist!) 

III. Why do these particles show as monopoles?

 

(the other pole is locked up in the inside of the vortex 

oscillation!) 

IV. Why do the particles have the form of spheres?

 

(for reason of the outside pressure by the concentration 

effect!) 

V.   Why is the elementary quantum stable?

 

(without conductivity no decay of vortices takes place!) 

VI.   Why does for every particle of matter exist an antiparticle? 

(there are two swirl directions with equal rights!) 

VII. Why are particles and antiparticles incom- 

patible?

 

(contrary swirl directions!) 

Fig. 4.4:    Key questions of quantum physics 

---

Properties

 

59

 

4.4 Quanta as field vortices

 

The fied-theoretical approach demands removing the electron from the field equations

 

(eq. 3.7) and at the same time introducing the potential vortex of the electric field. With

 

this vortex phenomenon there  now is a possibility that the electromagnetic wave

 

spontaneously rolls up to a vortex in case it is disturbed from the outside. The vortex

 

particle that is formed in such a way owes its physical reality on the one hand the

 

concentration effect of the potential vortex, that compresses this particle to the dimension

 

of a tiny sphere and on the other hand its localization for reason of the oscillation around

 

a fixed point.

 

The sphcrical   elementary   particles   are   being   compressed   to   inconceivably   small

 

dimensions. Therefore they are capable to bind a comparatively high energy in their

 

inside. This is confirmed by the mass-energy relation  E = mc

2

 . 

(4.1)

 

The fact that the energy is dependent on the speed of light can be judged to be a clear

 

i n dica ti on  that quanta actually are nothing but oscillating electromagnetic packages, 

vortical oscillations of empty space!

 

The next question reads:

 

V. Why is the elementary quantum stable?

 

The worse the conductivity is, the more the potential vortex will be favoured, the more 

strongly the concentration effect will form, the smaller the spherical phenomena will get - 

the larger the authoritative relaxation time will be, i.e. the slower the decay of vortices 

and with  that the more stable the vortex phenomenon will be.

 

In the microcosm, that comes the ideal case of a particle-free vacuum very close, the 

spherical vortices because of the missing conductivity have an absolute stability.

 

VI.     Why does for every particle of matter exist an antiparticle?

 

Since every vortex can also oscillate

 

in the opposite direction, there always exist two forms of formation of spherical vortices 

with equal rights, one of them is assigned to the world of matter and the other to the world 

of anti-matter.

 

VII. Why are particles and antiparticles incompatible?

 

For reason of the contrary swirl direction they are incompatible to each other. They have 

the tendency to destroy each other mutually, like two trains that want in the opposite 

direction on a single-tracked distance.

 

The quantum physical approach does not have an answer to these key questions. Until

 

now scientists have merely thought about to what the observable contraction in the

 

microcosm and the macrocosm can be traced back. Because the approach was not able to

 

furnish an answer, without further ado some new matter was introduced: the sluons. These

 

binding particles should be able to exert the necessary pressure. But until now no one has

 

been able to observe or detect this fabulous matter. Nobody knows its structure and its

 

composition. Despite missing evidence it is stated that this matter is mass less and at the

 

same time lumped; it is invisible because it can't interact with any other matter, not even

 

with the supposed building parts of the atomic nuclei, the quarks. But at the same time

 

there should be exerted a pressure on the quarks, for which reason quarks again should be

 

able to interact with gluons!

 

---