60
the photon
Fig. 4.5: Two coaxial oscillating vortex rings (Lugt
).
Lugt, Hans J.: Vortex flow in nature and technology. Krieger publishing
company, Florida 1995; page 42, ISBN 0-89464-916-7
properties ______________________________________________________________61
4.5 The photon
The ability to form structures as a consequence of the concentration effect gives the
potential vortex a number of highly interesting properties. To derive these properties we
can make work easier when we fall back upon the observations and experiences of flow
dynamics.
Here the vortex ring takes a special place. Its vortex centre is not closed, for which reason
it is not stationary and propagates in space with a constant speed. It can be observed that
the velocity of propagation increases with the ring diameter becoming smaller. By means
of the vortex rings, that skilful smokers can produce with pointed lips, these properties can
be made visible.
Now if two vortex rings run into each other with the same axis and direction of rotation
then both oscillate around each other, by one vortex attracting the other vortex, thereby
accelerating and thus contracting it. The second vortex then slips through the core opening
and gets again slower and larger. Now the first vortex accelerates and plays the same game
(fig. 4.5).
It
would be obvious for the vortex of the electric field to have a corresponding property.
The electron e- and with the opposite swirl direction the positron e+ will form such a
potential vortex corresponding to the derivation. Two electrons, as like charged particles,
would repel each other and surely will be out of the question for such a configuration. An
electron and a positron however will attract each other and because of their
incompatibility they will mutually destroy unless they open their vortex centres to form a
vortex ring. Now the e- shows its positively charged centre that shows the same swirl
direction as the e+ seen from the outside. Therefore the vortices don't hurt each other,
when the positron slips through the opened vortex centre of the electron and vice versa.
This oscillating electron-positron pair has strange properties: seen from the outside one
moment it is negatively charged and the next moment it is positively charged. Therefore
over time on the average no charge will be measurable and no electromagnetic inter-
action will take place.
One moment the particle is matter and the next moment it is anti-matter. Hence no mass at
all can be attributed to the particle. Interactions primarily takes place between both dual
vortices. We can predict, the particle has neither mass nor charge. The environment
merely sees a fast oscillating particle that only within every half cycle is capable of an
interaction.
The centre of the oscillating particle is open, for which reason it is not stationary
anymore. Instead it propagates in z-direction with
the swirl velocity, which is the speed of
light, in this way preventing a rotation around the x- or y- axis (fig. 4.6). In this way a
polarizability is present.
The only possible and, as we will see, necessarily taking place rotation around the z-axis
gives the particle a spin of the magnitude of a quantum of angular momentum. After all
the rotation for e
-
and e
+
is of the same magnitude with a spin of each time
There
should be paid attention to the fact that for the case of an opposite sense of direction of the
respective rotation around the common z-axis the spin on the average will be zero.
In addition the particle is characterized by an outstanding property: a periodically taking
place
oscillation with any frequency, but that frequency has to be constant.
We now only have to take a table of particles to hand. Actually we will find a corre-
sponding particle that has all these properties: the
also called photon.
62
pair creation |
Fig. 4.6: The photon as oscillating electron-positron pair
The decay of the - quanta (photon)
( = pair creation = Bethe-Heitler-process 1934 ):
(4.2)
Nachtmann, Otto: Phanomene und Konzepte der Elementarteilchenphysik,
Vieweg, Braunschweig 1986, S. 135, ISBN 3-528-08926-1
Properties ______________________________________________________________________63
4.6 Pair creation
Proof for the correctness of the model concept provides the decay of the photon in an
electron and a positron in the presence of a strong field, as for instance in an atomic
nucleus. This observable decay is called pair creation or Bethe-Heitler process
:
(4.2)
In this process the elementary vortices for a short time get back their localization and are
therefore detectable. Otherwise the electron and positron have the form of a sphere, the
photon however rather has the form of two oscillating discs.
The photon doesn't participate in the electromagnetic interaction, because the electric field
lines run from one disc to the other (from + to -). The field lines are not open as they are
for e
-
or e
+
(fig. 4.3). To open up the field lines an energy is necessary that corresponds to
the sum of the two formed particles. But from this it by no means follows that this amount
of energy will be released in the reversed and much better known process, where matter
and anti-matter annihilate under emission of
At the end of the derivation the
vortex model will provide us the desired answers on questions of the energy of photons.
Here first of all only the properties will be concerned.
Experiments, in which light shows as a particle, are the photoelectric effect, the Compton
effect and a lot more. According to the by Maxwell developed classical theory of light
however is light an electromagnetic wave that is not quantized in any way, neither as
sphere nor as disc, the wave nature of light as well has a physical reality and is secured by
experiment. This is witnessed by the interference patterns of overlapping coherent light
beams.
A concept in which light could exist at the same place and the same time both as wave and
as corpuscle could never be brought into accord with the principle of causality. Formulas
of compromise, like the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg that refers to the point of
view of the observer, can't change anything about this dilemma. The dual nature of light,
that in this context is gladly spoken of, rather consists of the fact that dependent on the
local field conditions, any time and spontaneously the wave can roll up to a vortex.
As an example of a violation of the principle of causality it has been indicated under point
3 (fig. 3.1) that both fields and quanta at the same time should be the cause of something.
This concept was formulated by Maxwell and written down in modern quantum electro-
dynamics by Dirac but in the field-theoretical approach we have dropped this concept
because it violates all rules of causality in an elementary manner. Therefore it only is
consistent, if we hold the view that the light is either wave or particle but never is both at
the same time!
In the spontaneous transition of the wave to the particle all the important properties are
conserved: the propagation with the speed of light, the characteristic frequency of the
oscillation and the mentioned polarizability.
The process of rolling up possibly takes place already in the laboratory, in a bubble
chamber and at the latest in our eyes. To receive the electromagnetic wave, we had to have
antennas. We actually see the photons. It therefore would be obvious if our cells to see
only could perceive vortices, in this case photons. We don't possess a sense organ for
fields and waves.