The Holy Grail
Controlling Human Life on the Planet
Kevin Mugur Galalae
(14 November 2014)
A flood of revelations hit me a few days ago. Their significance will undoubtedly change
society and ultimately history. To help you follow my thought processes I will write them down
in the order my mind unraveled them by going backwards in time. I shall find a more cursive,
structured and elegant form at a later date, if time and circumstances will allow me the luxury.
In writing my
letters to heads of state
for the past two months it has become clear to me that in
every country the population control effort invariably leads back to the Ministry of Health as the
coordinating agency at the national level and to the World Health Organization (WHO) and its
smaller sister the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) as the international coordinating
Why? Because procreation is a biological problem doctors and dentists were called in to help
solve it. Doctors have always had to clean up people’s reproductive mistakes and get rid of
unwanted fetuses. After all, they deliver babies into the world, perform abortions and distribute
contraceptives. They are, so to say, the front line in the war against fertility.
But reproduction is not a problem for medical science to solve but for social science. Doctors
interfere with the people’s reproductive systems not because they malfunction, but because they
function all too well and the human species multiplies too fast. Doctors have taken on this role
because social scientists are at a loss of how to solve the problem of uncontrolled fertility and
because politicians will not touch it. And doctors, in order to fulfill their professional oath and
do no harm, or at the very least do as little harm as possible, have arrived at the conclusion that
the best and most humane way to control population growth is to prevent the moment of
conception, which they do by injecting the people of the developing world with sterilizing
vaccines and surrounding the people of the developed world with endocrine disruptors (fluoride,
bisphenol A, artificial sweeteners). GMOs and chemtrails complete the job.
Doctors have to play God to save lives, but they cannot be allowed to play God to harm life so as
to save society. Yet that is exactly what they are doing in contravention of the Hippocratic Oath.
They are doing this as part and parcel of their secret mandate given by religious and political
authorities to help humanity escape the cycle of poverty and war so as to maintain social
stability. That is how the medical Mafia came to be and why the pharmaceutical industry has
grown so mighty and wealthy.
It is ironic that I, a doctor’s son, should reveal this inconvenient truth and in so doing break the
back of the medical Mafia that my father, an internist, never tired of telling me about in
whispering tones when I was a child and accompanied him bright-eyed and full of admiration on
But doctors were not the first to take up the fight against human fertility. Medicine itself is the
progeny of religion in the Christian world and to this day a great proportion of hospitals and
universities are owned and operated by various Christian denominations, Catholicism being by
far the leading one. Until the Age of Enlightenment and even much later, almost until the end of
the nineteenth century, the entire education and health systems were firmly in the grip of the
The International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) has made startling
revelations over the past five years of the countless babies and children that were murdered by
religious establishments. Lime pits containing the remains of fetuses, infants and children have
been found on the properties of nunneries, convents and religious schools around the world.
They were either the aborted fetuses of nuns, who engaged in sexual acts with priests, or the
bodies of children born out of wedlock and of orphans and abandoned children at a time in the
West’s history when population growth was suppressed by making sexual intercourse outside
marriage a social crime and by depriving women of the right and the means to raise their
children. The women were instead forced to abandon their children to the Church and the
Church took care of as many as it could in its institutions and killed the rest.
The ITCCS has also exposed the murder of countless native children in schools run by various
Christian denominations throughout the Commonwealth nations of the former British Empire, a
genocide committed to free the land for European settlers. The Americas were cleansed of
natives so the heathen could be replaced by God-fearing Christians. Much the same has
happened on all other continents to satiate European greed and aggression
, but more than
anything to alleviate the pressures of overpopulation on the European continent.
If the Church committed these heinous crimes with full social approval until the middle of the
century, when its power was but a shadow of its former self, what did it do in previous
centuries when it had total control over society as a temporal and religious power? How did
societies in past centuries combat human fertility to ensure they do not outgrow food production
and end up in famine and war?
Clearly, the Christian world was the first to escape the scourge of poverty and to produce enough
surplus food to enable technical and scientific progress long before the Industrial Revolution
began around 1760 in the United Kingdom. This leap forward cannot be attributed to the
superior intelligence of Caucasians, since no race has a monopoly on intelligence, but rather to
the early suppression of human fertility and population growth, which enabled the production of
surplus food that in turn made greater professional specialization and greater concentrations of
wealth possible; these being the precursors of peace and stability that alone can enable social,
technological and scientific evolution, in other words our continuing evolution.
In asking myself these questions it dawned on me that monasticism, the plagues, and later the
Inquisition and even the flu pandemic of 1918, were the Church’s earlier methods of controlling
population to save Europe from famine and war and pave the way towards an ever higher level
; an escape from the cycle of poverty and war, the prison created by unrelenting
and unrestricted human procreation and the bitter struggle for existence they engender in a finite
world where human beings have always had to go to extraordinary lengths to earn their creature
By persuading a large proportion of the population that celibacy is a necessary precondition of
service to God and far more desirable than marriage, family life and child-bearing, and by
enshrining the desirability of abstinence, obedience, humility and poverty in canon law, the
Catholic Church found a rather elegant way to prevent millions of men and women from making
use of their reproductive organs and from exercising their God-given reproductive rights thus
effectively suppressing population growth to a significant degree.
If not religious fervor then economic pressures often caused by land shortage forced many
parents to give at least one child to the Church who, if a woman, would be promptly cloistered as
a nun in convents and nunneries and would never experience the joy of motherhood, and if a man
would become clergy and be bound by chastity and never experience the joy of fatherhood. The
more men fell in war or joined the Church to become clergymen the more women would have to
be condemned to a monastic life, more often than not against their will, as they would have
remained unmarried anyhow due to a shortage of men. Monasticism therefore was not only a
mode of suppressing population growth but also of restoring the balance of numbers between
men and women in society, which was crucially important at a time and in a culture that
prohibited both children out of wedlock and polygamy.
Outside the Church society employed chastity belts to keep both men and women virgin, thus
help them abstain from sexual intercourse until marriage. Elsewhere in the world a good
proportion of the men were castrated and an equivalent number of women confined to harems
not to indulge the sexual phantasies of the rich, for a single man cannot possibly satisfy more
than a woman or two, but to be kept sex starved and childless for the rest of their lives, which is
why the harems were guarded by eunuchs.
From the 14
century onward, Europe was devastated by recurrent outbreaks of the bubonic
plague, which came to be known as the Black Death because it caused necrosis and turned
fingers, toes, noses and ears pitch black and putrid. I contend that the Church recognized the
evangelizing, economic and ultimately demographic potential of the plague in the aftermath of
the Plague of Justinian, which hit the Byzantine Empire in the sixth century A.D. and was
Christendom’s first encounter with this terrible disease.
At first, the Church would have used the plague as a way to concentrate more wealth and land in
its own hands, undoubtedly to be able to care for the poor that kept being dumped at its doors.
Then it recognized the plague’s usefulness as a tool to frighten people to behave and obey lest
they offend God and bring down his wrath. And finally, experience showed that the plague
could serve as a very effective tool to preempt famine and war or at least gain a respite from
them to enable society to progress. In other words, greed and piety have driven the depopulation
effort all the same and in the process enrich Christendom by redistributing wealth in fewer hands
in the aftermath of a pandemic that invariably killed a third to half the population.
There are many indicators that point to the plague as a depopulation tool deliberately used by the
Church. First, epidemiological accounts cannot explain the rapid spread and high mortality rate
of the plague pandemics that ravaged Europe from the 14
to the 19
although the disease purportedly originated in the Orient it had by far the highest mortality rate
in Europe and especially in Italy, France, and Spain, the heart of Catholicism. Third, the plague
came with clockwork regularity every forty years or so to any given place in Christendom and
took with it a third to half of the living, concentrating wealth in fewer hands by shaving off the
population growth of previous decades. And fourth, the plague hit densely populated cities and
isolated villages with the same fury, which cannot be explained by the disease’s transmission
It spread not because people travelled much in those days, but because monks especially
designated for this task would carry rats that harbored the fleas carrying the disease from city to
city, town to town and village to village. The pathogens were brought along with their flee-
infested rodent hosts from a hot spot or a breeding ground when the Church deemed the number
of people to be too large for the land to feed or as soon as abject poverty showed its ugly teeth.
If the armies of the 14
century knew how to spread the pestilence by catapulting diseased
corpses over the fortified walls of besieged towns, an act recorded many times in the annals of
history, the Church certainly knew how to spread the disease in a far more inconspicuous way.
The Church was the only organization with the means and the connections necessary to be able
to send envoys from country to country and also with a presence throughout Europe, the Middle
East, the Far East, Africa, and since the 15
century also the Americas. The clergy was the only
educated segment of the population and merely wearing a habit and carrying a letter of free
passage from the Pope or a Cardinal or a Bishop would suffice to grant a monk or a priest the
mobility necessary to move across the continent and spread a pathogen when and if needed.
Innumerable church properties throughout Europe would facilitate such travels and provide these
itinerant monks with a roof over their heads in every town or village they would need to target.
The Church was also the only organization of the time with the scientific knowledge to use
pathogens and their hosts, being the repository of all knowledge in those days, and with the
exclusive use of a language, Latin, to be able to pass on a message across the continent without
becoming public knowledge, which explains the great secrecy the Church has always shrouded
herself in and the bitterness with which it refused the use of vernacular languages for sacred
purposes. Without a universal language reserved only to the clergy, periodic mass killings could
not have been committed and kept secret.
I suspect that the Vatican reserved for itself the authority necessary to trigger a mass killing
event, since only the Vatican received information from throughout the realm and had a view of
when society stood on the brink of famine or war due to population pressures. The Church did
not need statistics for it had confessions to gage the overall material and emotional situation of
the people. Besides, a decision of such horrific consequences would have had to be carried out
and be limited to only the highest authority in Christendom, the Pope, with intimate counsel from
the Cardinals in the Roman curia.
All traces point to the Dominicans, the so-called Black Friars, as the ones to assume the task of
waging biological warfare on the people of Europe for evangelizing, economic and demographic
purposes on behalf of Rome. Being the most highly educated people in Europe, the Dominicans
would have figured out that the carrier of the disease was the Oriental rat flea and that these fleas
lived up to a year, which made them easy to breed and transport. Being mendicant, the
Dominicans were always on the move and among the people, which means that no one would
have been able to trace the infection back to them or suspect them in any way. Being founded to
solve the problems of the burgeoning population of cities, they would have easily recognized the
potential of the plague for combatting population growth and instilling the fear of God into the
people. Being fiercely loyal and blindly obedient to the Church and sworn to a life of poverty
and sacrifice, they would have not shied away from risking their own lives to carry out God’s
work. Being the Vatican’s most trusted people, they would have not refused to carry out the
order to murder millions with the plague just as they did not refuse the task to carry out the
Inquisition and torture, burn and kill countless heretics and as many as twenty million witches
over the course of six centuries.
More importantly, the Dominicans were established in 1216 to bring about a new kind of order,
which sounds awfully close to the New World Order, and a highly developed governmental
structure. They were also the only order universally authorized by the pope to preach, a power
formerly reserved to local episcopal authorities but granted only to the Dominicans in 1217 by
Pope Honorius III. Nor did the Dominicans shy away from diabolical cruelty, as they were
empowered and authorized in 1252 to use torture by Pope Gregory IX, which they did and
earned them the name
Dostları ilə paylaş: