Who Killed Diana, and Why? Citizens Electoral Council of Australia

3

threatened him with a coup, should he ever come to 

power. In May 2017 Kelvin Mackenzie, columnist and 

former editor of Rupert Murdoch’s Sun tabloid, an-

nounced that he would like to see the headline “Jer-

emy Corbyn knifed by asylum seeker”. Then the Tele-

graph of 7 June 2017, on election eve, carried a col-

umn by former MI6 chief Richard Dearlove (the agen-

cy’s director of operations when Diana was killed), 

headlined “Jeremy Corbyn is a danger to this nation” 

and denouncing the Labour leader as “an old-fashioned 

international socialist” who “wouldn’t clear the securi-

ty vetting” at MI6. Amid such demonisation of Corbyn, 

there came the ominous report from a security source 

(Mail on Sunday, 28 May), that the American Federal 

Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had alerted MI5 in January 

2017 to Manchester Arena bomber Abedi’s membership 

in a gang “that was plotting an attack in the UK”, and 

that “It was thought at the time that Abedi was planning 

to assassinate a political figure.” 

The Deaths in Paris, 20 Years on

The whorish “major media” of the UK and world-

wide still proclaim that Diana’s death was an accident 

caused by the actions of a drunken Henri Paul and of 

paparazzi who chased their speeding car into a pillar 

in the underpass. Thus, although millions of Britons 

believe she was murdered, few are aware of what the 

jury’s verdict was in 2008, after the longest and most 

expensive inquest in British history: not “accidental 

death”, but “unlawful killing”—a verdict defined in 

British law as subsuming manslaughter or homicide 

by one or more unknown persons. 

The verdict cited not “the paparazzi”, but uniden-

tified “following vehicles”. Despite abundant eyewit-

ness testimony about those “following vehicles” and 

other actors present in and around the tunnel that fate-

ful night, British authorities to this day have made no 

attempt to determine who they were. 

The CEC has two special vantage points from which 

to revisit the unlawful killing of Diana, and its polit-

ical implications. One is our long association with 

Executive Intelligence Review magazine in the Unit-

ed States, which in 1997-2002 published some 30 

ground-breaking articles on the events, establishing 

itself as the publication of record on the subject and 

earning EIR the fear-driven rage of the British Estab-

lishment. Moreover, EIR had produced an earlier body 

of work, published in 1994 as 

The Coming Fall of the 

House of Windsor

, which dealt with the evil nature 

and real power of the British Crown, as opposed to 

the Royal Family’s image as a quaint, benign relic of 

earlier times; the importance of this exposé was con-

firmed by the Princess of Wales in written correspon-

dence with an EIR journalist. 

Secondly, the CEC had the privilege of collaborat-

ing with the late New Zealand-born, Australia-based 

researcher John Morgan, whose work on the 1997 

unlawful killings—and especially the evidence and 

leads suppressed or covered up during the investiga-

tions and inquest—drew on EIR as an early source, but 

soon dwarfed that of any other individual or institu-

tion. Applying his lifetime of experience as a forensic 

accountant, an expert in evidence-handling and eval-

uation, Morgan explored both the car crash itself, and 

irregularities in the official treatment of the case. With-

out having presupposed such a conclusion, he became 

convinced that Diana had been murdered at the be-

hest of the Crown, and that the British foreign intelli-

gence agency MI6 had carried out the crime. Morgan 

set forth the evidence that led him to that view in ten 

published volumes. The last chapter of his final, sum-

mary volume, How They Murdered Princess Diana, 

containing a list of 44 contradictions and unanswered 

questions in the official investigations, is reproduced 

on pages 19-20 of this pamphlet. The first two articles 

in the pamphlet, originally published in 2014 and 

2015, discuss works drawing on Morgan’s research: 

Keith Allen’s 2011 film Unlawful Killing and the play 

Truth, Lies, Diana, by Jon Conway, which opened in 

London in 2015. The review of Conway’s play (p. 5) 

presents points of evidence and investigative leads 

highlighted by Morgan, while the film review (p. 12), 

like the movie itself, focuses on the astounding errors 

and omissions in the 2007-08 Royal Courts of Justice 

inquest and on the background to the Royal Family’s 

animosity towards Diana.

On pages 21-34 we excerpt the limited-circulation 

Tribute to John Morgan album, produced by the CEC 

in 2016 after his death. It includes tributes and insights 

from the authors of Unlawful Killing and Truth, Lies, 

Diana, as well as EIR’s investigative team.

Table of Contents

British Royals Feel Heat over Diana’s Assassination   

 

 

  5

Suppressed Film Exposes Royal Stonewall of Diana Murder Probe   

12

Michael Cole: Diana Predicted Her Murder   

 

 

 

17

John Morgan Interview: Diana Predicted How She Would Die 

 

18

“How They Murdered Princess Diana”, by John Morgan 

 

 

19

Honouring John Morgan (excerpts from tribute book) 

 

 

21

Petition: “Break up the City’s Mega-banks: Pass Glass-Steagall!” 

 

35

Break Up Crown/City of London Criminal Financial Empire: 

   Glass-Steagall Bank Separation Now! 

 

 

 

 

36

From page 2

---